📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Napa County Grand Jury • 2024-2025

County of Napa

Published: June 30, 2025 36 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 8 findings

F1 Page 49
Bond financing is the primary source of funding for addressing the capital needs of the Napa Valley Unified School District.
F2 Page 49
The NVUSD website is complex to navigate making it difficult to find bond financial data and reports.
F3 Page 49
Charging NVUSD employee salaries against bond funds, while permissible in limited circumstances, may reduce public trust by contradicting public pledges and bond ballot language that states, “no funds for administrators”.
F4 Page 49
NVUSD does not adequately inform the general public that the Citizen Bond Oversight Committees play critical roles in satisfying California’s Proposition 39 (2000), which requires school boards to establish independent oversight committees and conduct annual financial and performance audits until all bond funds have been spent.
F5 Page 49
NVUSD’s Citizen Bond Oversight Committees lack thorough and independent training on the roles, scope of work, relationship with school district personnel, and authority of its members.
F6 Page 49
The creation and execution of NVUSD’s 2016-2025 Facilities Master Plan had only limited public participation. NVUSD Policy 7110: Facilities Master Plan is found at the NVUSD Policies website, https://simbli.eboardsolutions.com/Policy/PolicyListing.aspx?S=36030213. Education Code § 17070.54. 42 | P age COMMENDATION The 2024-25 Napa County Civil Grand Jury commends the volunteer members of the NVUSD Bond Oversight Committees for their monitoring spending of Measure H and Measure A2 bond funds.
F7 Page 68
School bus transportation service was found to be inadequate to serve the district, with persistent equipment problems undermining reliability.
F8 Page 68
The school community is divided, with one group of parents and teachers supporting changes in the school and another favoring a return to prior practices and personnel. 61 | P age

Recommendations 6

Commendations 2