📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
El Dorado County Grand Jury
• 2000-2001
Growlersberg Conservation Camp, Georgetown
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 10 findings
F1
Page 42
The Growlersberg Conservation Camp is a facility that is operated jointly by the California State Department of Forestry and the California State Department of Corrections.
F2
Page 42
The facility was designed and constructed in 1966/67 as an 80-man facility. The population has increased to 132.
F3
Page 42
Some areas contained bunks beds because of over crowding.
F4
Page 42
The kitchen and food preparation area has been outfitted with a larger range than was originally installed. At this time the range hood is a hazard and does not meet Code. Plans to construct a new office building and kitchen within two years will resolve some problems.
F5
Page 42
The dining area was also designed for 80 persons so inmates must be fed in two shifts.
F6
Page 42
Housing areas were clean and orderly 43
F7
Page 43
The kitchen food preparation area was clean and orderly. The quantity and quality of food served was satisfactory
F8
Page 43
There are provisions for Inmate recreation. A small but adequate library is utilized by inmates on a regulated basis, with a limited number allowed to use it at any given time.
F9
Page 43
Management by the correctional staff seemed to be efficient and professional
F10
Page 43
There was virtually no ADA compliance.
Recommendations 2
-
R1Page 43Immediate steps should be taken to upgrade the food preparation area to meet all current safety standards relating to ranges and range hood exhaust systems. This recommendation was also made by the 1999-2000 Grand Jury.
-
R2Page 43There should be steps taken to comply with ADA. Responses Required for Findings