📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Lake County Grand Jury
• 2009-2010
District Attorney / Sheriff Office Complaint
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 6 findings
F1
Page 218
The District Attorney’s letter was correct as it referred to the appropriate case, naming one of the two alleged assailants and the date the complaint was filed, per department protocol.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Page 218
There is a documented statement taken from the complainant‘s husband on record.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Page 218
There is no documentation, report, or witness statement to support the complainant’s allegations of assault except her husband‘s.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Page 218
The complainant was not aware of the law requiring a citizen’s arrest if an alleged misdemeanor is not witnessed by a police officer (PC 837).
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Page 218
The District Attorney cannot pursue a case for which there is insufficient evidence and little chance of a conviction.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Page 218
The Lake County Sheriff‘s office exercised ‘due diligence’ in its investigation of this issue, conducting a thorough investigation.
No recommendations for this finding