📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Napa County Grand Jury • 2023-2024

Hitting the Reset Button; Addressing Gangs in Napa County

View PDF View Full Original

Findings 9 findings

F1 Page 46
The Jury found that gang activity and gang association in Napa County are on the rise.
F2 Page 46
The Jury found that due to the employment demographics in Napa County, increasing numbers of children are left unsupervised. This situation was exacerbated by the Covid Pandemic.
F3 Page 46
The Jury found current gang activity and recruitment is more apparent in middle school and even younger ages.
F4 Page 46
The Jury found that despite it having been proved to be successful, vocational curriculum has been eliminated within the NVUSD.
F5 Page 46
The Jury found that Napa County has little to no after school activities for teens and preteens. There is a need for organized free programs, including sports and other after school activities.
F6 Page 46
The Jury found that gang activity is supported by illegal money-making opportunities which can be attractive to underprivileged youth.
F7 Page 46
The Jury found that coordination and communication among law enforcement, educators, and local service providers is not effective.
F8 Page 46
The Jury found that data on gang membership and activity is limited and ineffective at gang intervention and prevention.
F9 Page 46
The Jury found that some state legislation and propositions passed by the voters are hindering law enforcement’s ability to interdict gang crime and, in doing so, improve gangs’ ability to make money, which attracts more gang members. Commendations C1. The Jury commends the Napa Police Department Special Enforcement Unit as well as the Napa County District Attorney’s office’s interdiction efforts to stop gang violence. C2. The Jury commends the Napa Police Department’s Juvenile Diversion Program and the dedication of its diversion officer. C3. The Jury commends the Napa Police Department, Napa Sheriff’s Department, the Napa Valley Unified School District, and the Napa County Office of Education for their School Resource Officer program and also acknowledges the dedication of the School Resource Officers assigned to the Napa County Schools. C4. The Jury commends the Napa County Probation Department’s officers assigned to Camille Creek who go beyond their duties to help at-risk youth as well as the officers assigned to supervise gang members and associates. C5. The Jury commends the Napa Sheriff’s Department for its Youth Activities League programs.

Recommendations 9