📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Nevada County Grand Jury • 2017-2018

Willthe Public Suffer Because of Unfunded Pension Liabilities

Published: July 19, 2018 87 pages Consolidated Report
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 10 findings

F1
Nearly every Nevada County agency has a Net Pension Liability. Agree
F2
Many Nevada County agencies, especially schools, lack a sufficient Net Position to successfully comply with the requirement to reduce their Net Pension Liability. Disagree. Responding only for County of Nevada agencies. Annual required contributions (ARC) set by CaIPERS are intended to pay down the Net Pension Liability over a period of time. The County has always met the ARC and expects to do so in the future.
F3
Some Nevada County agencies, especially schools, have a negative Net Position. Disagree. Responding only for the County of Nevada agencies. The County's total net position as of June 30,2017 was positive $270 million.
F4
Transparency demands that financial statements provided by the office of the Superintendent of Schools identify each charter schools Net Pension Liability. Agree.
F5
The strain on Nevada County agency budgets is likely to require cutbacks in services to balance the pension contributions increases. Partially Disagree. The County of Nevada takes this matter very seriously and has taken numerous proactive measures to mitigate the impact of rising pension costs and manage Net Pension Liability impacts. The County maximizes revenue opportunities and has accumulated fund balance to help address rising pension costs. If the economy and revenues drop significantly for a sustained period of time, or there are additional changes from CaIPERS requiring higher contributions than are currently known, there may be impacts to services.
F6
Many agencies may spend down their reserves to avoid cutbacks in services. Partially Disagree. Responding only for County of Nevada agencies. Nevada County has a budget policy, which states that the "budget will only use reserve funds for emergency and one-time expenditures or for purposes that the reserve is designated to fund. Every effort will be used to preserve funds." This policy has been in place since just after the Great Recession and has led to the County generally maintaining or building reserves in recent years. In addition, the County Board of Supervisors has adopted a Fund Balance Policy, which guides decisions on use of fund balances, generally for emergencies or economic uncertainties or targeted priority expenditures. Every economic downturn causes the consideration of spending reserves to avoid cutbacks in services. This finding is not specific to the pension liability issue.
F7
New sources of revenue may be requested by many agencies to avoid cutbacks in services or reduction ofreserves. Agree. Responding only for County of Nevada agencies. The County of Nevada agencies continuously seek new sources of revenue to fund services. Most of these revenues are from State and Federal sources for specific programs.
F8
The public bears most of the risk if CaIPERS and CaISTRS investments continue to underperform. Partially Disagree. Responding only for County of Nevada agencies. The County of Nevada is unable to respond to this finding as we have no way of knowing how CaIPERS and CaISTRS 5 will mitigate the risk of underperforming investments or how much risk will be passed on and to whom. B. RESPONSES TO RECOMMENDATIONS Rl: The Nevada County Chief Executive Officer should provide a separate presentation to the Board of Supervisors describing the County's curent Net Pension Liability and providing a plan for addressing the problem. The presentation should not be hidden in the annual budget report presentation. This recommendation will not be implemented because it is unwarranted. The County Executive Office already reports specifically on the Net Pension Liability issue multiple times during the year. It is presented in depth during the budget hearings, at the Board of Supervisors Annual Workshop and throughout the year as Board actions are recommended by the County Executive Office. Pension costs have been highlighted in the last twelve budget messages delivered by the CEO and CFO.
F9
Higgins Fire Protection District is out of compliance with Govemment Code 26909 by not filing an audited financial statement for 201 5-2016. Agree. However, we would like to note that we have no independent knowledge of this fact and are relying entirely on the Grand Jury's report as to this finding.
F10
Nevada City School of the Arts' financial statements should reflect their Net pension Liability. Agree. However, we would like to note that we have no independent knowledge of the laws applicable to Nevada City School of the Arts and are relying entirely on the Grand Jury's report as to this finding.

Recommendations 7