Ventura County Grand Jury • 2020-2021

School Bus Safety for Special Education Students

Published: April 23, 2021 30 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 13 findings

F01
The Grand Jury finds that bus drivers are expected to do a demanding set of tasks: simultaneously drive a bus while following all the rules of the road and monitor and respond to any behavioral issues during the bus ride.
No recommendations for this finding
F02
The Grand Jury finds that among special education students, autistic, emotionally disturbed, and combined loss of hearing and vision students are distinctly vulnerable populations that would benefit from increased supervisory presence on the school bus.
No recommendations for this finding
F03
The Grand Jury finds that VCOE transports a significant number of County special education students, including autistic, emotionally disturbed, and those with combined loss of hearing and vision.
No recommendations for this finding
F04
The Grand Jury finds that the County SELPA is a valuable resource for any family with a child who has special needs.
No recommendations for this finding
F05
The Grand Jury finds that VCOE follows an established process to assign a transportation aide for special education students on the bus through an IEP.
No recommendations for this finding
F06
The Grand Jury finds that VCOE transportation personnel (bus drivers and transportation administrators) are rarely included in student IEP meetings.
No recommendations for this finding
F07
The Grand Jury finds that VCOE uses a case-by-case method for determining the need for a non-IEP assigned bus attendant to a school bus.
No recommendations for this finding
F08
The Grand Jury finds that the current policy and practice of submission of Bus Conduct Report Forms at VCOE does not include a method for analyzing information from completed Bus Conduct Report Forms to identify and determine trends and recurring safety issues on buses for special education students.
No recommendations for this finding
F09
The Grand Jury finds that the VCOE Policy and Procedures for Transportation of Special Education Students does not include a procedure regarding the use of bus attendants as suggested by the California Special Education Transportation Guidelines.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
The Grand Jury finds that VCOE has no written standards, policies, or procedures by which a school administrator can evaluate the need for and request a bus attendant on a special education school bus.
Related Recommendations (1)
R03
The Grand Jury recommends that VCOE adopt a procedure by which a VCOE administrator can evaluate the need for, and request, a bus attendant. (F-10, F-11)
F11
The Grand Jury finds that having an additional adult on a school bus transporting student with behavioral problems is one of several strategies that would increase supervision and safety on buses for special education students.
Related Recommendations (1)
R04
The Grand Jury recommends that VCOE adopt a procedure that relates to strategies for assuring increased supervision and a safe environment on a school bus. Strategies could include assigning bus attendants to buses carrying students of higher risk, for example, autistic, emotionally disturbed, or deaf/blind students. Another strategy could be installing internal cameras or other innovative systems on special education school buses. (F-02, F-11, F-12, F-13) RESPONSES Responses required from: The following elected officer : Ventura County Superintendent of Schools (F-01, F-02, F-03, F-05, F-06, F-07,
F12
The Grand Jury finds that installation of video cameras on a school bus is one of several strategies that would increase supervision and safety on buses for special education students. School Bus Safety for Special Education Students
Related Recommendations (1)
R04
The Grand Jury recommends that VCOE adopt a procedure that relates to strategies for assuring increased supervision and a safe environment on a school bus. Strategies could include assigning bus attendants to buses carrying students of higher risk, for example, autistic, emotionally disturbed, or deaf/blind students. Another strategy could be installing internal cameras or other innovative systems on special education school buses. (F-02, F-11, F-12, F-13) RESPONSES Responses required from: The following elected officer : Ventura County Superintendent of Schools (F-01, F-02, F-03, F-05, F-06, F-07,
F13
The Grand Jury finds that new systems for school bus monitoring and supervision are being explored and utilized by at least one County school district. RECOMMENDATIONS
No recommendations for this finding

Additional Recommendations 2

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

Commendations 7

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Ventura County County Superintendent of Schools Elected County Office