Sonoma County Grand Jury • 2015-2016 • Agency Response

Responses to the 2015/16 Civil Grand Jury Report Providing Continuity By Following Through On Previous Investigations

Published: June 15, 2017 12 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 3 findings

F1 Page 2
The 2015/16 Sonoma County Civil Grand Jury issued 28 recommendations requiring responses from 11 different County agencies or governing boards.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Page 4
The Sonoma County Auditor- Controller-Treasurer-Tax Collector, LAFCO and the Sonoma County's Clerk- Recorder-Assessor cooperate to create Clerk Recorder and publish a listing of Sonoma County Recommendation has been Assessor - William YES No comment. special districts on the County website. partially implemented. Rousseau The list should include existing websites, names and terms of office of board members and special district contact information.
F2 Page 2
All the responses received were in compliance with the requirements of the Penal Code.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Page 4
The County Auditor track, monitor and review the audit reports of Assistant Auditor- independent special districts. Non- Controller-Treasurer- This recommendation will YES No comment. submissions, late reports and audit Tax Collector - Erick not be implemented. report findings should be highlighted in Roeser a report to the Board of Supervisors.
F3 Page 2
In some cases the Grand Jury recommendations were overly broad or not specific enough to permit actionable and measurable responses.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Page 4
The County Auditor provide information to all special districts Assistant Auditor- regarding the options and procedures Controller-Treasurer- This recommendation will Information on audits and procedures YES for obtaining approval for either a Tax Collector - Erick be implemented. mailed September, 2016. multilayer audit or a financial review in Roeser lieu of an actual audit.