⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 11 findings
F01
The City of San Diego needs to address the gaps in emergency and fire protection services. Fact: Proposition 172 was passed in 1993 to offset partially the loss of local property tax revenue shifted to the State to augment educational funding. The revenue generated by the additional ½ cent sales tax was intended to fund local public safety agencies. Fact Firefighting agencies are considered public safety agencies. _____________________________________________________________________9 Fact: At the time Prop 172 was passed the County of San Diego had no fire agency to which sales tax revenue could be allocated.
No recommendations for this finding
F02
The 2003 and 2007 wildfires have demonstrated a need for the creation of a consolidated County fire agency.
No recommendations for this finding
F03
The use of Proposition 172 money to fund a County fire agency is appropriate.
No recommendations for this finding
F04
Due to the size and composition of a county that includes 18 cities, solutions need to be proposed and implemented as soon as possible.
No recommendations for this finding
F05
The County of San Diego does not comply with NFPA standards for emergency response time or emergency response locations. Fact Fire Fighters are expected to respond to medical and life safety emergencies in addition to fire emergencies.
No recommendations for this finding
F06
Emergency medical or life safety calls outnumber fire calls by three to one or at least 75% of calls for emergency assistance to Fire Fighters.
No recommendations for this finding
F07
Higher than average response times reduce the ability of responding agencies to prevent loss of life and property. Fact: Six volunteer fire departments are in County Service Areas under the San Diego County Department of Planning and Land Use. Fact: The Fire Prevention Unit in the Department of Planning and Land Use has experience in managing fuels reduction programs and in administering the Fire Enhancement Program.
No recommendations for this finding
F08
The staff of the Fire Prevention Unit in the Department of Planning and Land Use have sufficient expertise to serve as staff for a newly created fire agency.
No recommendations for this finding
F09
Sixteen cities responded to the Grand Jury’s request for copies of their Standard Operating Procedures Manual for Emergencies (SOP). Two cities in the county, La Mesa and Imperial Beach did not. Fact: The Cedar Fires presented unforeseen difficulties for emergency personnel. As a result, many of the existing disaster procedures were changed to accommodate weather, terrain and evacuation of inhabitants. Fact: Many of the “Emergency Disaster Procedure Plans” were developed after the Cedar Fires and finalized in September 2006 by the county and most of the cities in the county. However, a few are still incomplete. _____________________________________________________________________15 Fact: The Red Cross has limited ability to meet the sheltering needs of all evacuees within the first 48 hours of a major disaster. Fact: The County of San Diego is responsible for meeting the sheltering needs not provided by the Red Cross.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
The County of San Diego needs an understanding of the sheltering capacity of the local Red Cross during the first 48 hours of a major disaster.
Related Recommendations (1)
R10
Coordination and control of dispatch activities.
F11
Neither the County of San Diego nor any of the cities, including the City of San Diego, had a standard operating procedure for the operation of a mega- shelter.
Related Recommendations (1)
R11
Coordination of training for all participating departments.
Additional Recommendations 3
These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.
-
R12Incorporation of the existing funding, staff and functions of the Fire Prevention Unit in DPLU, including the Fire Enhancement Program.
-
R13Establishment of the Office of the San Diego County Fire Commander as an independent office, not as a component of the Department of Planning and Land Use.
-
R14Creation of the position of San Diego County Fire Commander, either on the level of a Deputy Chief Administrative Officer or reporting directly to the Deputy Chief Administrative Officer for Public Safety. _____________________________________________________________________12 FACTS/FINDINGS Fact: The National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) suggests appropriate response time to emergencies be within 5 to 7 minutes. To meet that standard, Fire Stations/Emergency Response Centers need to serve areas within a radius of five miles of the station.
Commendations 1
-
CM1The 2007/2008 San Diego County Grand Jury wishes to commend: All of the firefighters, professional and volunteer, who put their lives on the line in the assault against the 2007 wildfires. This includes both our local firefighters and those from outside jurisdictions who answered the call for aid. All of the thousands of volunteers who staffed emergency shelters, telephone information lines and other disaster aid operations; also the citizens of San Diego who donated time, money, goods, services, etc. The management and staff of the City Office of Homeland Security for its establishment and management of the mega-shelter at Qualcomm Stadium on short notice and with no standard operating procedures in place. The management and staff of the County Office of Emergency Services for its establishment of the mega-shelter at the Del Mar Fairgrounds on short notice and with no specific operating procedures for a mega-shelter in place. The Office of Administration of the City of San Diego Mayor for its prompt activation and efficient management of the Rancho Bernardo Local Assistance Center. This commendation also applies to the City and County staff that worked long hours at all four Local Assistance Centers and other assigned facilities. Also the County Health and Human Services Agency for its management of those centers operated by the County. The Food Services Division of the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department for expanding and re- deploying its feeding capacity to include field meals of emergency responders, the National Guard and fire victims at evacuation facilities. In addition to their regular workload, these include almost 15,000 meals supplied to the Red Cross for the feeding of evacuees. The Court Services Division of the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department for its ability to re-assign deputies promptly to security and traffic control functions in the evacuated areas. COMPLETE RECOMMENDATIONS The 2007/2008 San Diego County Grand Jury recommends that the Mayor and City Council of the City of San Diego: 08-105: Prepare a ballot measure for the proposing a 2.5% increase in the Transient Occupancy Tax to be used solely for the purpose of improving fire protection levels including additional stations, engines, firefighters, training, equipment, etc. as outlined in the After Action Reports. _____________________________________________________________________17 SAN DIEGO COUNTY GRAND JURY 2007—2008 (filed May 29, 2008) 08-106: Reallocate existing funds and develop new revenue streams. The 2007/2008 San Diego County Grand Jury recommends that the San Diego County Board of Supervisors: 08-107: Review the County Board of Supervisors Policy A-176 on the allocation of Proposition 172 funds with the objective of earmarking a portion of these funds for firefighting purposes. 08-108: Approve and fund the consolidation of fire agencies according to the Phase I plan of the Local Agency Formation Commission or a substantially similar plan. 08-109: Create the position of San Diego County Fire Commander, either as a Deputy Chief Administrative Officer or to report directly to the Deputy Chief Administrative Officer for Public Safety. The 2007/2008 San Diego County Grand Jury recommends that the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services: 08-110: Include the Executive Director of Volunteer San Diego, or designee, as a participant in Office of Emergency Services training exercises and as a representative at the Operational Area Emergency Operations Center in actual incidents. 08-111: Revise the County’s Memorandum of Understanding with the San Diego/Imperial Counties Chapter of the American Red Cross to include a quantification of its ability to staff and equip emergency shelters, especially in the first 48 hours of a major disaster. 08-112: Maintain at the Office of Emergency Services a complete roster, broken down by zip code, of County staff that has been trained in shelter operations. Roster should also indicate languages spoken other than English. 08-113: Request that the Red Cross roster of trained shelter staff be coded to identify language skills. 08-114: Revise Annex G of the Operational Area Emergency Plan to include a plan for the establishment and operation of a mega-shelter. The 2007/2008 San Diego County Grand Jury recommends that the Office of Homeland Security of the City of San Diego: 08-115: Adopt an Emergency Care and Sheltering Plan for the City of San Diego which includes a plan for the establishment and operation of a mega-shelter, with particular application to the Qualcomm Stadium facility. _____________________________________________________________________18 SAN DIEGO COUNTY GRAND JURY 2007—2008 (filed May 29, 2008) REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS The California Penal Code §933(c) requires any public agency which the Grand Jury has reviewed, and about which it has issued a final report, to comment to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the agency. Such comment shall be made no later than 90 days after the Grand Jury publishes its report (filed with the Clerk of the Court); except that in the case of a report containing findings and recommendations pertaining to a department or agency headed by an elected County official (e.g. District Attorney, Sheriff, etc.), such comment shall be made within 60 days to the Presiding Judge with an information copy sent to the Board of Supervisors. Furthermore, California Penal Code §933.05(a), (b), (c), details, as follows, the manner in which such comment(s) are to be made: (a) As to each grand jury finding, the responding person or entity shall indicate one of the following: (1) The respondent agrees with the finding (2) The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefore. (b) As to each grand jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall report one of the following actions: (1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action. (2) The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a time frame for implementation. (3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This time frame shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the grand jury report. (4) The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefore. (c) If a finding or recommendation of the grand jury addresses budgetary or personnel matters of a county agency or department headed by an elected officer, both the agency or department head and the Board of Supervisors shall respond if requested by the grand jury, but the response of the Board of Supervisors shall address only those budgetary or personnel matters over which it has some decision making authority. The response of the _____________________________________________________________________19 SAN DIEGO COUNTY GRAND JURY 2007—2008 (filed May 29, 2008) elected agency or department head shall address all aspects of the findings or recommendations affecting his or her agency or department. Comments to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court in compliance with the Penal Code §933.05 are required from the: Responding Agency Recommendations Date Mayor, City of San Diego 08-105, 08-106 8/31/08 City Council, City of San Diego 08-105, 08-106 8/31/08 San Diego County Board of 08-107, 08-108, 08-109 8/31/08 Supervisors San Diego County Office of 08-110, 08-111, 08-112, 8/31/08 Emergency Services 08-113, 08-114 Office of Homeland Security, City of 08-115 8/31/08 San Diego _____________________________________________________________________20 SAN DIEGO COUNTY GRAND JURY 2007—2008 (filed May 29, 2008)
No Responses Found 2
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.
San Diego
City
San Diego County Board of Supervisors
Elected County Office