Grand Jury Endorses Patrol Vehicle Cameras
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 2 findings
Additional Recommendations 1
These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.
-
R3That the police departments of the cities of Santa Barbara and the Guadalupe install current audio/visual technology for all of their patrol vehicles.
Observations 12
-
OB1All county law enforcement agencies except the police departments of the cities of Santa Barbara and Guadalupe have currently installed audio/visual technology in their patrol vehicles.
-
OB2Citing costs, the police departments of the cities of Santa Barbara and Guadalupe currently do not have audio/video technology installed in their patrol vehicles.
-
OB3Enhanced officer accountability
-
OB4Enhanced officer safety
-
OB5Traffic stop and field investigations are resolved more quickly in court
-
OB6Complaints against law enforcement personnel are resolved more quickly
-
OB7Reduction of time and expense in certain investigations
-
OB8Video images aid in suspect identification
-
OB9Video data are invaluable as evidence in court proceedings Disadvantages
-
OB10Any call for service where the recorder may aid in the apprehension and/or prosecution of a suspect
-
OB11Any situation that becomes adversarial after the initial contact
-
OB12An officer believes that a recording of an incident would be appropriate The use of these systems is to provide an unbiased audio/video record that would be used to supplement the officer’s report. Generally, most agencies have the same policy for the storage of the recorded information based on Government Code Section 34090.6. Once the audio/video record is booked into evidence, it will be retained for a minimum of one year. After that, it may be erased or destroyed unless there is pending litigation. All of the County’s law enforcement agencies that currently have audio/video systems were supportive of the technology. However, one agency did cite numerous glitches with 2011-2012 Santa Barbara County Grand Jury 3 GRAND JURY ENDORSES PATROL VEHICLE CAMERAS their equipment including battery issues, equipment checks, as well as lapses in dealing with the use of the technology. A modern law enforcement agency should take advantage of this kind of innovation which may reduce its liabilities and increase the level of trust held by the citizenry it serves. Based on overwhelmingly positive evaluations by the law enforcement community, the Santa Barbara County Grand Jury recommends that the police departments of Santa Barbara and Guadalupe obtain funding for, and install this technology. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Finding 1 All county law enforcement agencies except the police departments of the cities of Santa Barbara and Guadalupe have currently installed audio/visual technology in their patrol vehicles. Finding 2 Citing costs, the police departments of the cities of Santa Barbara and Guadalupe currently do not have audio/video technology installed in their patrol vehicles.
Agency Responses 1
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.
No Responses Found 1
Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.