Speed Traps in Tulare County

The California Vehicle Code4 governs were conducted covering the same cooperation on the part of the Traffic Division speed limits in California. Tulare County traffic areas as those conducted in

The California Vehicle Code provides the of the RMA. The comparative chart Board of Supervisors (BOS) agenda of 2008, this time identifying two changes means for speed limits to be completed by the Grand Jury revealed that July 7, 2009 states, “The CVC also in the 30 locations. established by local authorities on the the 2008 engineering and traffic surveys provides the means for speed limits to basis of engineering and traffic surveys. reflected a need for a change in speed limits be established by local authorities on 5. The 2009 survey in the Plainview area that were never submitted for an ordinance 1See 1e Sntedhe oe ef ntbhdai sos fri esthp ioosr frt efaoprno rC toe fuonnrg tCiyno Ouernedtiryni naOngrdc iean anCnodcd eet rCPaoafdrftei cI IP I,a rt III3,S Cehea cphteaw rr t1 aa, s tA ertni c cdo l eon f1 dt huics treedpo rtf.rom May 5, 2009

In 2008, engineering and traffic surveys amendment to the BOS. RMA’s failure to Chap2t eCrsa 1tliu,f odArrynt.iic al eV e1hiCcloen Csoidsete snetc tionw 4it0h8 02t(hai)s(2 ), CinV tChe Tular4eC aCloifuonrntyita hL Vriboerhuairgcylh eo rCJ touhdneee Cs ae5lci,ft oio2rnn0isa0 2 w92e 3ba4 ns8id tte h srouupgpho 2r2te41d3 a, were completed in 18 communities and submit resolution amendments to the BOS, 2Califhotrtn p pi: r a/ o /V v we i w s h i iwc o .l n ed m , C ov.d T cea u .s l g a eo r cv e t/io pnu b C 4s o 0/ u 8vc0 n t2 t o y (pa , / )v(2c b /),v y ic n. ht B htme o T a u r l d a re in the Tulsapree eCodu nlitmy Liti bcrahrayn ogr eth ew Chaiclihfo rwniaa sw eabp spirteo ved County Library or the California web site http://www.dmv. http://w3w0w .dmlovc.caat.igoonvs/p ubws/hvicctho p/vscu/vpcp.hotmrted 25 based on engineering and traffic surveys action, has established speed limits on on July 21, 2009. From survey to ca.gov/pubs/vctop/vc/vc.htm changes in speed limits. The RMA failed completed in 2008, have created “speed designated streets and highway ordinance adoption, the speed limit traps” through out the County. segments. If the results of a new change took less than two months. TØhi s 74 engineering and traffic study do not 3 See chwaarts a t tehned oof nthlyis rcehpaornt.ge made based on 4California Vehicle Code sections 22348 through There is an appearance of preferential support an existing speed limit, a speed either the 2008 or 2009 engineering 22413, in the Tulare County Library or the California treatment concerning the Plainview speed limit adjustment that is consistent with web site a nd traffic surveys. limit change. It was the only change made of the study is recommended. CVC Section ht tp://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/vc/vc.htm 627 of the CVC requires the 6. Numerous requests in the form of consideration of all the following for the letters, visits and phone calls by the posting of speed limit: 1) prevailing Grand Jury for the “most recent” speeds as determined by traffic engineering and traffic surveys were not engineering measurements; 2) accident honored by the Traffic Division of the reports; and 3) highway, traffic and RMA. Only outdated information was roadside conditions not readily apparent provided initially. to the driver. In addition to these factors, local authorities may consider CONCLUSIONS residential density, pedestrian and bicycle safety as well.” This investigation was hindered by the lack of cooperation on the part of the Traffic Division

In 2009, engineering and traffic surveys bicycle safety as well.” This investigation was hindered by the lack of