Santa Clara County Grand Jury • 2011-2012

2011-2012 Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury Report Change Starts at the Top in Santa Clara Valley Medical Center

Published: April 06, 2011 15 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 7 findings

F1
The new SCVMC management team is making good strides to address historically poor financial management by creating cost center manager responsibility, targeted to deliver break-even or better financial performance.
Related Recommendations (2)
R1A
The County should require that SCVMC stays within the budget to avoid future unplanned subsidies from the General Fund.
R1B
The County should require that hospital leadership runs SCVMC as a business and require leadership to make appropriate financial decisions using the data the hospital systems generate.
F2
SCVMC has historically operated below capacity, which directly contributed to its chronically poor financial performance, resulting in County bailout from the General Fund. Increasing productivity is critical to SCVMC’s financial performance.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The County should implement systems to increase productivity in reaching break-even financial performance.
F3
The performance indicators imposed by the HCRA—improved patient experience, improved capacity and access, measure and control cost—are precisely the measures that should have been in place years ago and, if implemented, can lead to significantly improved SCVMC performance.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Regardless of how HCRA may be affected by the United States Supreme Court decision, the County should adopt performance measurements consistent with the HCRA indicators because they can lead to improved SCVMC performance. 11
F4
The Audit pointed out that SCVMC keeps a separate set of books from the County’s SAP system, and the two do not match. This makes it difficult to obtain accurate financial information.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The County should develop and implement an interface between the SCVMC and County systems to ensure data consistency, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
F5
SCVMC financial data is not transparent to the public due to the confusing way parts of SCVMC finances are broken up and tracked in the County’s CAFR.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The County should require an SCVMC consolidated financial statement reported as part of the CAFR.
F6
The new EpicCare system offers benefits in streamlining records, patient access to records, and accounting performance (accounts payable/accounts receivable systems).
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The County should give SCVMC’s implementation of EpicCare top priority to meet the scheduled May 2013 date.
F7
SCVMC has best-in-class care facilities that would be attractive to new patients, but SCVMC does little to advertise its services and specialties to attract new patients.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
The County should establish a marketing function directed at increasing public awareness of the services SCVMC offers.

Conclusions 8

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office