6 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
The West Sacramento Port Commission reported the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Fulcrum-Bluerise was entered and recorded at their closed Board meeting in March 2022, but no record was found in the March 2022 minutes. The public was unaware that an ENA was being considered for this property and created a perception the Port Commission was not being transparent in their plans.
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
The West Sacramento Port Commission reported the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Fulcrum-Bluerise was entered and recorded at their closed Board meeting in March 2022, but no record was found in the March 2022 minutes. The public was unaware that an ENA was being considered for this property and created a perception the Port Commission was not being transparent in their plans. Response: The Port disagrees partially with the finding. The Port agrees that the March approval of the ENA was not reported following closed session, but disagrees that it should have been reported. The Ralph...
R1
The West Sacramento Port Commission should ensure future land negotiations are transparently reported and post the amended minutes of the March 2022 meeting to report the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Fulcrum-Bluerise. This should be completed
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
The West Sacramento Port Commission reported the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Fulcrum-Bluerise was entered and recorded at their closed Board meeting in March 2022, but no record was found in the March 2022 minutes. The public was unaware that an ENA was being considered for this property and created a perception the Port Commission was not being transparent in their plans. Response: The Port disagrees partially with the finding. The Port agrees that the March approval of the ENA was not reported following closed session, but disagrees that it should have been reported. The Ralph...
F2
In order for the West Sacramento Port Commission to proceed with the Purchase and Sale Agreement of the Seaway property as described in Resolution No. P22-4 of the Port Commission, adopted on October 5, 2022, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) must deem the property Exempt Surplus Property from the Surplus Land Act (SLA). The process described by law for the property to be exempt requires the Port Commission to apply to the HCD for approval and exemption. The Po...
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
In order for the West Sacramento Port Commission to proceed with the Purchase and Sale Agreement of the Seaway property as described in Resolution No. P22-4 of the Port Commission, adopted on October 5, 2022, the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) must deem the property Exempt Surplus Property from the Surplus land Act (SLA). The process described by law for the property to be exempt requires All statutory references are to the Government Code unless otherwise noted. 1110 West Capitol Avenue West Sacramento, CA 95691 (916) 617-4880 Port of West Sacramento at www.c...
R2
The West Sacramento Port Commission should post the SLA exemption from HCD, dated March 27, 2024, to a public site and linked to Resolution No. P22-4. This should be completed
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
The recommendation has been implemented. A copy of Resolution P22-4 and HCD's letter, dated March 27, 2024, confirming the Port properly identified the Property as exempt surplus land can be found on the Port of West Sacramento's webpage at: https://www.cityofwestsacramento.org/government/departments/city-manager-s-office/port-ofwest-sacramento
R-3.
The West Sacramento Port Commission should develop a new and updated Port Policies Manual to reflect actual Port practices and strategies envisioned in the 2013 Business 2545490.2 9361.001
Docusign Envelope ID: 85F054A5-3975-499D-B351-D1B0D3BA80...
F3
The Sacramento-Yolo Port Policies Manual of 1997 is out-of-date, does not include guidance on the sale of surplus land, and does not address strategies and policies for the sale and use of real estate properties. RECOMMENDATIONS The Grand Jury makes the following recommendations:
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Sacramento-Yolo Port Policies Manual of 1997 is out-of-date, does not include guidance on the sale of surplus land, and does not address strategies and policies for the sale and use of real estate properties. Response: The Port agrees with the finding. GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS
R-1.
The West Sacramento Port Commission should ensure future land negotiations are transparently reported and post the amended minutes of the March 2022 meeting to report the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Fulcrum-Bluerise. This should be completed by January 1, 2025. Response: The recommendation to ...
R3
The West Sacramento Port Commission should develop a new and updated Port Policies Manual to reflect actual Port practices and strategies envisioned in the 2013 Business Plan, specifically addressing strategies and policies for the sale and use of its real estate properties. This should be completed by January 1, 2025. COMMENDATION The Grand Jury appreciates the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for explaining the Statewide Housing Plan and their role in holding ju...
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
The Sacramento-Yolo Port Policies Manual of 1997 is out-of-date, does not include guidance on the sale of surplus land, and does not address strategies and policies for the sale and use of real estate properties. Response: The Port agrees with the finding. GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS
R-1.
The West Sacramento Port Commission should ensure future land negotiations are transparently reported and post the amended minutes of the March 2022 meeting to report the Exclusive Negotiating Agreement (ENA) with Fulcrum-Bluerise. This should be completed by January 1, 2025. Response: The recommendation to ...