📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Siskiyou County Grand Jury • 2017-2018

Siskiyou County Civil Grand Jury Responses

6 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F6, F7

Findings 6 findings

F1 Page 18
“We reviewed the computer logs for the years involving code enforcement activities. The Department implementing the new ordinance provisions and establishing 2013 and 2014. In 2013, 271 complaints were entered, with thanks the Grand Jury for this recommendation and it is the new code enforcement processes will take a little time. 28% showing unresolved; in 2014, 57% showed unresolved. anticipated that the Department’s updated processes will The Community Development Department staff has Since the complaint binder, which includes unresolved include maintaining “open” complaints in both a hard copy committed to reporting on the effectiveness of the new code complaints, is put into storage at the end of the year, the and an electronic form, ensuring the consistency of enforcement ordinance in November, 2015. At this time, the percentage of unresolved complaints may actually be lower. information in both written and electronic forms, and staff Board will also review any Department recommended Inaccurate and untimely reporting of complaint resolutions training on the new procedures and availability of changes to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the may affect these statistics. It was learned that log print-outs information. As noted earlier, it is anticipated that this effort County’s code enforcement ordinance provisions.” are not reviewed regularly, or used as a management tool. will be implemented prior to the end of this year.” There appears to be no designated individual assigned to “The partial disagreement notation stems from the track complaint handling. Staff shortages may make this Finding 3.“The issuance of fines and the permit revocation recommendation that the use permit revocation process be tracking difficult.” process is time-consuming and unfortunately, not used often. used more often. The use permit revocation process can be While we understand the staff’s desire to minimize these a lengthy, time-consuming process as it requires a Planning
F2 Page 19
“The Auditor/Controller’s office performs audits California. believe this is an appropriate staffing level for this of the Treasurer/Tax Collector’s office on a monthly basis. department.” They try to alternate their auditors so that the same staff The Board of Supervisors, Auditor/Controller’s Office, and members are not dealing with each other month after month. Treasurer/Tax Collector need to work closely to fund or Population FTE's Staff reductions make this more difficult. The monthly audits reduce workloads. Lake County 63,965 11 performed would be more beneficial if the auditors were Tehama County 63,264 12 aware of the relevant government code and the Treasurer’s The numbers of parcels taxed does not decline, so work Siskiyou 44,223 14 office cash investment policy.” requirements remain the same. Tax revenue dollars might Lassen County 33,657 8.5 decline, but departments still have the same expenses. Del Norte County 28,248 8
F3 Page 21
“There appears to be a lack of concern by the the outcome of loans they approve. The LC would also Finding 12. “CDBG/EDBG program appears to lack City to pursue EDBG loan collateral. The Grand Jury could benefit if they were more included in the loan process. The transparency. Of those interviewed few within the City seem not find a policy, procedure or threshold that the City is using LC is an advisory board and should be independent.” to clearly understand the program.” in this regard. For loan programs to be legitimate this process has to occur when necessary. The Grand Jury could Recommendation 7.“LC should be given training and gain Recommendation 12. “Appropriate reporting should not find retrieval of loan collateral on EDBG loans an understanding of CDBG/EDBG guidelines. Reports be developed and made available to City administration reviewed.” showing status of existing loans, borrower performance and citizens of Weed. City Council should appoint a history, job creation and economic contribution should be CDBG commissioner to help carry out this task along
F4 Page 21
“The Grand Jury found little evidence of City inclusion in the process.” monitoring, regarding the requirement of EDBG loans to Recommendation 13.“City should seek assistance from create local jobs. The public has a right to know how appropriate State CDBG/EDBG departments. Additional effective a major City loan program like the EDBG is on jobs Finding 8.“The Grand Jury found varying opinions from training on program management, loan monitoring, and business revenue.” LC on what their responsibility is, who they work for, who procedures, collateral retrieval, loan modifications and appointed them and what the City expects of them. They delinquent payments would be beneficial. It may be helpful
F5 Page 20
“The Auditor/Controller’s office performs duty to aid in the evacuation. As a result, significant changes will be made to inform, reassure and guide everyone on financial functions for over two dozen special districts and have been made to the evacuation plans. campus; this will be followed with a loud fire alarm to ensure other entities within the county. These services are provided The Civil Grand Jury wishes to commend teachers, staff, that everyone on campus is alerted. at no charge.” students and concerned citizens for being diligent in the performance of their duties.” Finding 7.“Planning does not include drills for large-scale
F8 Page 20
“Some staff had not yet had experience in Response 5. The Board of Supervisors Disagrees. “The Finding 1.“Training made the evacuation plan successful.” handling a fire evacuation.” Board of Supervisors is very aware of the impacts of their decision not to charge Special Districts with the annual Costs Finding 2.“All staff should be commended for quick and calm Recommendation 3. “Include all staff such as custodians, Allocation charges to recover costs associated with the CAO, thinking. Staff worked hard to ensure that all children were and cafeteria workers, etc., in the evacuation plan.” Auditor/Controller, County Counsel & Tax safe.” Collector/Treasurer offices. The Board is aware of the Response to Finding 8 and Recommendation 3: “Since limited financial resources of most (if not all) of the Special Finding 3.“Panicking parents are a major concern in the Boles Fire all drills have included all staff including Districts. The Board understands that most Special Districts carrying out any evacuation plan.” cafeteria workers, custodians, and others.” are strictly volunteer based. Also, the Board has voiced their, concern over the large fluctuations in the Cost Allocation Recommendation 1.“The evacuation drill should include “Weed Union Elementary School District appreciates the charges and feel that the Special Districts fragile financial a simulated parent/student pick up. It might be wise to give commendation from the grand jury. Students, parents, staff positions could not absorb such fluctuating costs. Many information to the parents so they know what the procedure and the community have learned from the Boles Fire times these charges have fluctuated by over 100% within one is. If parents know what the school is doing, and why they Experience, and this new knowledge is valuable for year.” are doing it, they may not panic as much.” improving responses in any future emergency situations.” 20— 2015 - 2016 SISKIYOU COUNTY GRAND JURY REPORT SISKIYOU CO. CIVIL GRAND JURY RESPONSES TO THE 2014-2015 FINAL REPORT CITY OF WEED ADMINISTRATION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS (CDBG) The 2013-2014 Civil Grand Jury made 13 Findings and creation under the City EDBG loan program. This report Recommendation 8. “Information should be given to

Recommendations 6