📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Butte County Grand Jury
• 2006-2007
L a N D of N a T U R a L W E a L T H a N D Beauty Office Ofthe Auditor-controller County Administration Building 25
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 16 findings
F1
Page 110
The Auditor-Controller has adjusted his behavior to spend more time in the office. The respondent disagrees wholly with this finding. The Auditor-Controller has not adjusted any behavior to spend more time in the office. Absences on the part of the Auditor-Controller have been related to time off for vacations, holidays, attending meetings held by The Auditors Association, several Association Committees as a member, Megabyte Property Tax Meeting, Property Tax Managers meetings, and absences for medical reasons for the Auditor and his family. If anything has affected the attendance of the Auditor-Controller between last year and this year, it is some improvements in the medical issues that have demanded less time.
F2
Page 110
The Auditor-Controller appears to be making some effort to improve his interaction style; however, he is still viewed as intimidating as a result of his condescending and critical style. While this style of management may have been common in previous decades, more recent styles include much more positive, supportive guidance interaction. The respondent partially disagrees with the finding. As a supervisor, there are times when one must be critical of certain actions by an employee, and correction is necessary. Employees are encouraged with positive comments when appropriate and the Auditor-Controller will continue with this practice. Every individual can learn and gain from training and the Auditor-Controller is in the process of scheduling attendance at some management communication workshops on supervising employees in today's working environment. The Auditor-Controller takes these critical comments seriously and is making an effort to improve his interactive style.
F3
Page 110
Although reports from interviewees were varied, a certain amount of gender bias may be present in the office environment. The behavior may be inadvertent as result of cultural conditioning. The respondent disagrees wholly with the finding. There is no intentional gender bias towards anyone in the Auditor-Controller department.
F4
Page 110
Some staff members still report the fear of retaliation; some report actions that they believe are retaliatory in nature. The respondent disagrees wholly with the finding. There has never been retaliation on any employees in the Auditor-Controller office. It would be very helpful if the Grand Jury could be specific as to what retaliation has been brought on any employee so we can better understand this accusation and address it.
F5
Page 111
Morale in the Auditor-Controller's Office appears to be improving based on reports from a majority of the interviewees. Several changes in the office, previously described, have contributed to the increase in morale. The respondent agrees with the finding.
F6
Page 111
Issues affecting morale still need attention. Personnel issues, minimal communication between departments and among employees, little appreciation from higher administration, and lack of appropriate in-service trainings appear to be contributing to the problem. The respondent disagrees partially with the finding. In any environment with 31 staff members working closely together, there is always room for morale building. The Auditor-Controller and management staff has made great strides in improving communication within the department. Regular management staff meetings are held, as well as monthly meetings with the entire department staff. Training has increased significantly and dollars available and classes offered have increased for the 200712008 fiscal year. 7.A minimal amount of cross-training is being done. The respondent disagrees partially with the finding. Cross-training has varied from section to section. The Property Tax section is very well cross-trained. It should be noted that the four staff members in this section have been working together for a number of years, creating a more stable environment for cross- training. In the remaining sections of the office, efforts are continually being made to cross-train. With new staff in each section, however, the new staff member must learn their own duties first, before cross-training can occur.
F7
Page 132
D V/OR offenders are only allowed to attend the batterev 's educational program provided by FVEP, even though there is another certz$ed program available through another provider, NB. The DV/OR offenders do not have a choice ofprograms. Response - I wholly disagree with the first sentence of this finding in that there is only Grand Jury Response 2006-07 August 20,2007 Paqe 7 of 11 one "certified" batterer's educational program for DVIOR offenders - Family Violence Educational Programs (FVEP). FVEP is the only program approved by the District Attorney to provide the treatment and supervision services as needed for the DVIOR Program. Any certification for other programs is irrelevant. As to the second sentence of the finding, I disagree partially as there have been rare instances of a DVIOR offender now residing far away who have been allowed to participate in an out-of- county treatment program approved by the District Attorney.
F8
Page 111
Employees interviewed report that they have had more opportunity and support to attend in-service training programs, but would like to see Human Resources offer even more trainings helpful to management and other staff. The respondent agrees with the finding.
F9
Page 111
The process of developing an ofice manual and worksite responsibilities has been implemented. However, the manual does not appear to have a high priority. Many of the staff said they do not have time to work on it, and administration has not set any timelines. The respondent disagrees partially with the finding. Many staff members have completed their respective worksite responsibilities manual. Timelines were set by management; however, due to time constraints for some staff, manuals are still in process.
F10
Page 112
The office has done a good job at responding to problems which may be affecting response time by planning workshops for outside departments to better understand processes that must be followed for the Auditor- Controller's Office to do its job. The respondent agrees with the finding.
F11
Page 112
The Assistant Auditor-Controller has worked hard at learning a new job in a challenging environment. The respondent agrees with the finding.
F12
Page 112
The General Accounting Supervisor is viewed as a hard worker and a highly competent professional dealing with difficult issues and tasks. The respondent agrees with the finding.
F13
Page 112
The County has transferred Kronos and Pentamation Systems from the Auditor-Controller's Office to the Information Systems Department, thereby addressing time-management and budget issues. The respondent agrees with the finding.
F14
Page 112
The County has moved quickly to implement desired changes in the physical environment of the Auditor-Controller's Office. The respondent agrees with the finding.
F15
Page 112
The Audit Committee has developed by-laws and has minutes of meetings available. The respondent agrees with the finding.
F16
Page 112
Even though the Grand Jury is charged by the Penal Code with the responsibility to review the budgetary issues of the county, notice of Audit Committee meetings were not routinely sent until requested by the Grand Jury. The respondent agrees with the finding.
Recommendations 19
-
R1Page 116- The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but hopefully wilI be in the near future. I am doing all I can to convey the importance of fully funding the Assessor's office, and the long-term benefit of doing so.
-
R2Page 116- I have attempted to implement the recommendation, most recently as it applies to the 'support' division of my department. On April 24,2007, I forwarded an interdepartmental memo to the Administration and the Human Recourses (HR) Departments of Butte County, with supporting documentation, regarding inequities I believe occurred as a result of the 2005-2006 ClassICompensation Study. Specifically, an adverse effect of the ClassICompensation Study was the compression of our previous Assessment Clerk I and I1 positions into one entry-level position. This reduced the number of salary range differentials within the job series, and minimized promotional opportunities for long-term employees. The same-type compression occurred in our appraiser series. It takes years to train our support and appraisal sW, and I would like those qualified and so-inclined to have the opportunity for promotion by returning to pre-Class/Compensation Study salary range differentials.
-
R3Page 116- The recommendation has been implemented, and the cooperative working relationship we have with HR continues to be strengthened. I responded to the HR 'Recruitment Process Questionnaire' in February 2007. I appreciate the goal of the survey, August 8,2007 which was to provide HR with interdepartmental input to assist in analyzing and streamlining the recruitment process. The results were tabulated and it is my belief that the survey was not only a beneficial endeavor, but that it will assist in achieving its stated purpose.
-
R4Page 117- The recommendation has been implemented but there is only so much that can be done. My staff and I maintain on-going contact with the other two other tax-cycle departments (Auditor and Treasurer-Tax Collector) which utilize, and rely upon, the Megabyte property tax system. We are aligned in our attempt to gain improved service and accountability from the Consultant/Contractor, and I believe our efforts will eventually produce some positive results.
-
R5Page 117- The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted. One third of California counties (19) adhere to a minimum value assessment policy of $2,000. Twelve counties have no minimum value ordinance, and six counties have a minimum value assessment policy of between $700 and $1,350. Revenue and Taxation (R&T) statute 155.20 provides for a "determination" by the board based upon a costhenefit, or break- even analysis.. .essentially a determination of the point at which costs exceed the proceeds to be collected. Costs of annually processing and taxing parcels with base values of $2,001 to $5,000 do not exceed $20.00 per parcel. In Butte County, there are 855 parcels with base values of $2,001 to $5,000, for a total assessed value of $3,300,000. At a county general tax rate of 1%, foregone tax revenue would be $33,000 if the low value ordinance was amended to preclude these assessments from annual tax.
-
R6Page 117- The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future. Within the next month I will draft a 'Board Agenda Transmittal' requesting that a resolution be adopted, pursuant to R&T statute 155.20, to raise the low value threshold for transitory 'Possessory Interests7 to $50,000.
-
R7Page 110Human Resources should better educate employees about the grievance procedures to be followed in case of a retaliatory action. The respondent is unable to comment on this recommendation since it is directed to Human Resources. However, the Auditor-Controller agrees with the recommendation.
-
R7aPage 118- The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but hopejklly will be in the near future. I agree that the number of auditor-appraisers should be increased to five. However, that is not a possibility under current budget restraints. Additional finding to the Assessor's budget from the general fund will be necessary to increase the staff to a level adequate to maintain compliance with the mandatory audit regulations.
-
R7bPage 118- The recommendation has been implemented, however, even with an increase to the auditor-appraiser staff, the office is so far behind in its mandatory audit workload that extra help would be required to catch up to a level that could then be maintained by an increased staff. The continued use of a retired auditor-appraiser for a portion of each year can help reduce the audit backlog. This could take a few years. Without an increase in staffing, the extra help is essential to continue audits at the current level of production.
-
R7cPage 118- The recommendation has not yet been implemented, however, if adequate funding were received in the budget to fill all of the needed auditor-appraiser positions, it would not be necessary to perform extra CCCASE audit trips. We could perform only what is needed to offset the expense of the CCCASE audits that other counties are performing for our county. However, under the current budget situation, the revenue generated by the extra August 8,2007 CCCASE trips helps cover the salary of our third auditor-appraiser. A loss of that revenue would result in additional reduction of staff. While we are not completing all of the mandatory audits that are due, the extra auditor-appraiser is essential for help in processing property statements, valuing boats and aircraft, creating roll corrections, and handling the day-to-day dealings with taxpayers.
-
R8Page 119- The recommendation has been implemented, and I feel our participation in CCCASE continues to be the most practical tool for performing out-of-state audits. The alternative would be to do the audits through correspondence, which would consume more time, and result in a higher rate of inadequate information. It is often more difficult to gain compliance fiom taxpayers through correspondence.
-
R9Page 117- The recommendation has been implemented but there is only so much that can be done. The PTAP funding is extremely important to the overall budget of my department, and I am thankful to Administration for infilling the foregone funding for the 200712008 budget cycle. Permanent loss of $381,956 in annual PTAP hding would result in staff reductions my department can ill-afford. August 8,2007 Butte Countv Assessor's Response to Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations Below are responses to the findings and recommendations of the 2007 Grand Jury report as they apply speczjically to the Business Division.
-
R10Page 111The CAO should inform the Grand Jury of all meetings of the Audit Committee. The respondent is unable to comment on this recommendation since it is directed to the Chief Administrative Officer. However, the Auditor-Controller agrees with the recommendation. Responses Required (Penal Code c933 and 933.05) Butte County Auditor-Controller Butte County CAO Butte County Human Resources L A N D OF N A T U R A L W E A L T H A N D B E A U T Y KENNETH 0. REIMERS ASSESSOR 25 COUNTY CENTER DRIVE OROVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95965-3382 Telephone: (530)5 38-7721 Fa: (530)5 38-7991 Meegan Condon Senior Management Analyst Butte County Administration 25 County Center Dr. Oroville, CA 95965 Re: Assessor's Office Response to 200612007 Butte County Grand Jury Final Report Dear Meegan: In response to your memorandum of July 5, 2007, please find enclosed the Assessor's Office Response to the Butte County Grand Jury Final Report. Should you have any questions or concerns, please contact me. Sincerelv. KENNETH 0. RElMERS Assessor Enclosure August 8,2007 Butte County Assessor's Response to Grand Jury Findings and Recommendations Note: Responses to Findings 1,8,9, 10, and 11 , and responses to Recommendations 5,7a, 7b, 7c, 8, and 9, as they apply to the Business Division, are detailed on pages 3 and 4 of this document. Below are responses to findings and recommendations of the 2007 Grand Jury report, exclusive of the aforementioned responses to findings and recommendations applicable to the Business Division.
-
R11Page 131"The Board ofSupenn'sws nee& a cham undersana3ng @Butte Coung librq issues." The respondent neither agrees nor disagrees with this finding as it is outside the scope of responsibility of this department. Recommendations
-
R12Page 123In Butte County, there currently is no comprehensive domestic violence court to hear cases from start to finish before one speczjk judge. The District Attorney is supportive of implementing such a court. Response - I agree with this finding with the note that I have been advocating such a court for a number of years and although most judges are in general agreement, the Grand Jury Response 2006-07 August 20,2007 Paqe 9 of 11 court has indicated they do not currently have adequate resources to implement such a separate court calendar. 13 . According to Penal Code Section 1203.097, certified batterer 's educational program providers are to re-apply for certiJication annually. Twice during the year, the Probation Department is required to audit the programs. Response - I agree with this finding.
-
R13Page 144The County has transferred Kronos and Pentamation Systems from the Auditor-Controller's Office to the Information Systems Department, thereby addressing time-management and budget issues. The respondent agrees with this finding.
-
R14Page 124The Probation Department has not been keeping up with program audits and with the re- application process. Probation did begin the re-application process in Januav of 2007. Response - I can neither agree nor disagree with this finding as this is within the knowledge of the Probation Department. (I do note, however, the Probation Department, like many other county departments, continually struggles with unfunded state mandates such as this one.) 15 . Statisticsf or the number of offenders entering batterer 'se ducational interventionp rograms and successfully completing the program were not available. In addition, recidivism rates for offenders were not available. Response - I disagree partially with this finding. The information is available, it is the resources are that not available to capture the information. RESPONSE TO GRAND JURY RECOMMENDATIONS (For ease of reference, the Grand Jury recommendations are in italics and my response is in bold.)
-
R15Page 144The Auditor Committee has developed by-laws and has minutes of meetings available. The respondent neither agrees nor disagrees with this finding. The Respondent is not involved in this committee and therefore has no direct knowledge regarding this finding.
-
R16Page 145Even though the Grand Jury is charged by the Penal Code with the responsibility to review the budgetary issues of the county, notice of Audit committee meetings were not routinely sent until requested by the Grand Jury. The respondent neither agrees nor disagrees with this finding. The Respondent is not involved in this committee and therefore has no direct knowledge regarding this finding. FY 06-07 Grand Jury Response Butte County Department of Human Resources 9 Grand Jury Recommendatr ns