Score: -3
(0/0/3)
Sonoma County Grand Jury
• 2024-2025
Grand Jury Report - Airports
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 5 findings
F2
The Sonoma County Civil Grand Jury finds that:
STS's current management resources are more appropriate for a general aviation or small commercial airportthan for the medium sized passenger airport that Sonoma County Airport has become.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
ByDecemberl,2025,theSonomaCountyExecutiveOfficerwillevaluatewhetherSonoma County Airport should continue to be a deparhnent within Public Infrastructure or become a stand- alone agency and will forward an appropriate recommendation to the Board of Supervisors.
F3
The Sonoma County Civil Grand Jury finds that:
Sonoma County Airport's management is reactive rather than proactive due to inadequate resources and staffing. May 2025 Sonoma County CivilGrand Jury Sonoma County Airpolt
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
By December I,2025, the County Executive Officer will evaluate the need for engaging a qualified Airport Master Plan consultant as suggested in FAA Advisory Circular (AC) I 50/5070- 68 to facilitate a comprehensive review of the Charles M. Schultz-Sonoma County Airport Master Plan.
F4
The Sonoma County Civil Grand Jury finds that:
Sonoma County Airport projecs compete with road repair, traffic management, purchasing and other projecs for senior Public Infrastructure Department leadership attention.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
By June 1,2026, SonomaCounty Airport shall complete and publish a full update of the Airport Master Plan using the most current version of FAA Adv isory Circular (AC) I 5 0/5070-68 to guide requirements for completing the updated plan. Required Responses: Pursuant to Penal Code $$ 933 and 933.05, the civil grandjury requires responses as follows: o Sonoma County Infrastructure Departrnent to respond to Fl, Fl, F3, F4, F5; Rl , R4 o Sonoma County Executive Officer to respond to R2 and R3 The governing bodies indicated above should be aware thal their comments and responses must be conducted subject to the notice, agenda and open meeting requirements of the Brown Act. Responses must be submitted to the presidingjudge ofthe Sonoma County Supeior Court in accordance with the provisions of the Penal Code sections 933 and 933.05. Responses must include the information required by section 933.05. BIBLIOGRAPHY and References: o US Departrnent of Transportation - FAA, "Airport Master Report", December 9,2024. . hess Democrat, "Sonoma Jet Center sues Sonoma CourtyAirport, raising concems over fuel tank project as feud breaks out between tenants." Jurc 22,2024. o October 17, 2024, Sonoma County Airport Commission meeting notes o County of Sonoma, "Charles M. Schulz - Sonoma County Airport report to Board of Supervisors shows continued growth in passengers, revenue." October 16,2024. o Sonoma County Airport, "Master Plan" 2007 o FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, Section 163 Grant Assurance #25 May 2025 of9 Sonoma County Civil Gmnd Jury Sonoma County Airpofi Reports issued by the Civil Grand Jury do not ident{y individruls interviewed. Penol Code Section 929 requires that reports of the Grand Jury not contain the name ofany person orfacts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Civil Grand Jury. Mav 2025
F5
The Sonoma County Civil Grand Jury finds that:
Parking is the largest airport revenue source, but the absence of adequate parking on site is a material barrier to continued growt}t.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
The Sonoma County Civil Grand Jury finds that:
Sonoma County use ofairport Iand for non-airport purposes withow paying rent could expose the County to significant FAA penalties.
No recommendations for this finding
Conclusions 6
-
CL1 Page 9Sonoma County Airport projecs compete with road repair, traffic management, purchasing and other projecs for senior Public Infrastructure Department leadership attention.
-
CL2 Page 9Parking is the largest airport revenue source, but the absence of adequate parking on site is a material barrier to continued growt}t.
-
CL3 Page 9Sonoma County use ofairport Iand for non-airport purposes withow paying rent could expose the County to significant FAA penalties.
-
CL4 Page 8Sonoma County Airport's management is reactive rather than proactive due to inadequate resources and staffing. May 2025 Page 7 of 9 Sonoma County CivilGrand Jury Sonoma County Airpolt
-
CL5 Page 8STS's current management resources are more appropriate for a general aviation or small commercial airportthan for the medium sized passenger airport that Sonoma County Airport has become.
-
CL6 Page 8Sonoma County Airport is a critical economic and transportation asset for Sonoma County. It has grown rapidly from a sleepy general aviation airport to serve more than 700,000 passengers a year. However, its current management structure and planning approach are not consistent with this gowth, and are on a slow track to react. Current staffing and funding resources do not align with STS's rapid growth and evolving role in Sonoma County. STS faces significant challenges in strategic planning management continuity and capability, and facility capacity. Sonoma County Airport zzst address strucnral runway construction deficiencies. Community concems over air traffic noise, and inadequate parking capacity are hurdles that the atport must nav igate as it continues to expand. Addressing these operational and infrastructure challenges will be critical in maintainingthe airpo('s role as a vital gateway to No*hern Califomia, while also ensuring it remains a good neighbor to the surrounding community. The airport must also address all FAA compliance issues and further enhance the physical infrastructure to fully capitalize on its potential as a regional economic driver. During the past 5 years, Sonoma County Airport has demonstrated resilience and growth, and these efforts position the airport favorably among its national peers and contribute significantly to the region's economic vitality and connectivity, but the lack of a comprehensive forward-looking master plan is a significant concem that will likely constrain future development. Lookingahead, STS aims to continue its growth trajectory by attracting additional airline services and expanding its destination oflerings. Ongoing invesunents in infrastructure and community engagement are central to the airport's strates/ to strengthen is role as a key transportation gateway in Northern Califomia. However, airport management must also recognize and proactively plan for increased airline activity and expanded flight schedules if it hopes to sustain growth while maintaining satisfactory customer service. FIIIDINGS The Sonoma County Civil Grand Jury finds that: Fl. Charles M. Schultz - Sonoma County Akport's failure to update and execute its Master Plan in compliance with FAA recommendations is a root cause of airport maintenance and development problems. F2. STS's current management resources are more appropriate for a general aviation or small commercial airportthan for the medium sized passenger airport that Sonoma County Airport has become. F3. Sonoma County Airport's management is reactive rather than proactive due to inadequate resources and staffing. May 2025 Page 7 of 9 Sonoma County CivilGrand Jury Sonoma County Airpolt F4. Sonoma County Airport projecs compete with road repair, traffic management, purchasing and other projecs for senior Public Infrastructure Department leadership attention. F5. Parking is the largest airport revenue source, but the absence of adequate parking on site is a material barrier to continued growt}t. F6. Sonoma County use ofairport Iand for non-airport purposes withow paying rent could expose the County to significant FAA penalties.
Agency Responses 3
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.
In the News 1
News coverage of this report, automatically tracked.
Two new reports slam Sebastopol's handling of its Water and Sewer Funds, Part 1 - Sebastopol Times
Sebastopol Times
· June 11, 2026