📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Butte County Grand Jury • 2017-2018

Treasurer TAX Collector Department

10 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 8 findings

F1 Page 43
Over the past few years, as City staff positions have become vacant, the decisions about whether to fill a position or leave it vacant have been made “on the fly.” There is no overall plan regarding City staffing. Conducting an internal review of the City staff is simply not practical under the current circumstances given the shortage of staff.
F2 Page 43
Having one employee act as the City Administrator while also directing four City departments created an unhealthy situation.
F3 Page 43
Oroville has had five City Administrators during the past eight years. The turnover has had a negative impact on City staff morale.
F4 Page 43
Having the Oroville City Director of Public Safety also serving as the Director of Human Resources is inappropriate.
F5 Page 43
Although the City of Oroville has taken a number of drastic steps to reduce spending, the growth of general fund expenditures continues to greatly outpace the growth of current revenue.
F6 Page 43
There is mistrust and misunderstanding among the current members of the City Council leading to an unusually high level of dysfunction.
F7 Page 43
All of the members of the Oroville City Council are striving to do what they think is best for the City. There is, however, disagreement among the City Council Members over how to achieve these goals.
F8 Page 43
The Oroville City web page for “Contact City Council” did not provide the Grand Jury access to the City Council members. 32

Recommendations 8