📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Calaveras County Grand Jury
• 2003-2004
Calaveras County Planning Department
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 3 findings
F1
Page 22
For each job opening, an application Screening Committee of at least two people is established. This committee selects from three to ten applicants for interviews. An applicant may be disqualified based on a lack of qualifications, skills or experience; incomplete or falsified application; or if the maximum number of qualified applicants has been received. For this particular job opening there were 12 applicants, six male and six female. Four applicants, one male and three female, were chosen for interview by a three-person panel.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Page 22
The HRC’s Human Resource administrator followed all applicable guidelines as set forth in their board-approved recruitment and hiring policies.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Page 22
There was no proof that discrimination occurred during the applicant screening process at the Human Resources Council.
No recommendations for this finding