San Mateo County Grand Jury • 2006-2007

Issue | Background | Findings | Conclusions | Recommendations | Responses | Attachments Summary of The San Mateo/Estero

Published: October 05, 2006 16 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 16 findings

F1
Has installed new hardware for the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system and is upgrading the software. Employee training on the new system is underway. The new system is capable of monitoring plant operations and performing trending analysis.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Has rewritten 15 of 30 standard operating procedures (SOPs) and expects to complete the balance by the end of 2006. The plant operators are required to adhere to the SOPs.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Is developing a formal plan to monitor and improve plant performance.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Has recently updated the written job descriptions for each position.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Is developing a plan to encourage plant operators to take additional training courses and to obtain higher ratings.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
Has reassigned responsibility for preventive maintenance; work that was formerly done by the maintenance staff is now done by the operating staff. SMDPW has implemented automated tracking of maintenance work orders, and the computer system will soon start generating preventative maintenance work orders.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
Has formalized shift-to-shift communication; shift supervisors meet for 20 minutes at shift change. Additionally, SMPWD has implemented monthly informational meetings which have considerably improved communication.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Has digitized all relevant documents (e.g., monthly reports, lab results, SOPs, etc.) and made the reports available online. 3
No recommendations for this finding
F9
Will address operational responsibility for the Dale Avenue Pump Station after construction of the two new digesters is completed in Spring 2007.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
Has hired a consultant to address the 20-year plan for capital improvements; however, a replacement schedule for existing capital equipment does not yet exist. SMDPW is preparing a list of critical equipment. The MWH report also recommended that plant security be improved. Specifically, the report recommended “additional access controls and signage around the front gate of the WWTP in order to control access to the facility and assist visitors in finding the main office. Perimeter fencing should also be reviewed and repaired on a routine basis to minimize unauthorized access to the facility.” SMDPW has not implemented this
No recommendations for this finding
F11
The attitude of those responsible for the operation of the plant is “we don’t have a security problem, nothing has ever happened.”
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Make plant security a high priority and educate the staff on the need for increased awareness of and attention to physical security.
F12
The main gate is normally open during the day and signs instruct visitors to check in at the office. The route to the office is tortuous and not well marked.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Upgrade the physical security of the WWTP.
F13
The Grand Jury was told that plant security will be evaluated when the current construction projects are completed.
No recommendations for this finding
F14
SMDWP stated that closed circuit TV is one of the techniques that will be considered to improve perimeter security.
No recommendations for this finding
F15
The Grand Jury observed that two of the three gates in the perimeter fence are substantially compromised. There is a 10-inch gap below one gate and an 11-inch gap in the fencing at the other; a child or an adult could easily enter the plant at either location.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Upgrade the physical security of the WWTP.
F16
The Grand Jury visited one other wastewater treatment plant in the County and found that facility to be far more secure than the San Mateo/EMID plant. To wit, in the other treatment plant: o The main entrance gate is kept closed. An intercom at the gate allows the visitor to contact the office, after which the gate may be opened remotely. o The perimeter fencing is secure and properly maintained. o The facility is protected by an alarm system at night. o Plant operators appreciate the need for a secure environment and appear to actively monitor the facility. 4 o The operators of this facility plan to add closed circuit TV surveillance to their SCADA system. The Grand Jury evaluated the WWTP Emergency Response Plan and the Contingency Plan. For the purposes of this evaluation, credit was given if either of these plans addressed the required critical elements. The score awarded to the combined plans is 8 out of a possible 22. The evaluation criteria and the areas in which the plans are deficient are detailed in Appendices A and B. Conclusions San Mateo DPW has adopted, implemented, or is in the process of implementing, many of the recommendations in the MWH report. San Mateo DPW has not made plant security a high priority issue and significant deficiencies are evident. While the current construction project complicates the perimeter security problem, it does not lessen the need for improved security. The purpose of the fencing is to keep unauthorized persons from entering the facility. This is especially important during a construction project where persons could be injured on the property. The current state of disrepair of the perimeter fencing allows unauthorized access to the property which creates a potential danger to the public and liability exposure to the JPA. The WWTP Emergency Response Plan is deficient. Each of the following sections of the plan needs improvement: Purpose and Scope, Staff Roles and Responsibilities, Evacuation Procedures and Post-Emergency Plans. The Plan also fails to address the following five elements required in a comprehensive plan: SEMS/ICS Compliance, Decision Making Guidelines, Personnel Training Plan, Test & Update Training Plan and Plans for Coordinating with other Agencies.
No recommendations for this finding

Additional Recommendations 1

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

Conclusions 1

No Responses Found 2

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Foster City City
San Mateo City