⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 14 findings
F1
As of this writing, the county has no stated plans to determine a formula for in-lieu fee, or abolish it. The building of affordable housing units on the Dewitt Center stems from a commitment
F2
the county made when Auburn's Bell Garden Apartments were torn down, resulting in the displacing of the residents. -2018 Final Report Conclusion The County has taken positive steps to address the issue of affordable housing. We believe further actions are necessary.
F3
PCSO currently attaches written requests considered to be valid CPRA requests to the case file; and
F4
There is no method for tracking phone requests. Conclusion Two requests that were sent to the Placer County Sheriff's Office were not properly processed in accordance with the CPRA. There is no tracking system in place countywide indicating requests have been received. All requests, whether or not determined to be a valid CPRA request, should be tracked and responded to under the guidelines of the CPRA. If it is determined not to be a valid CPRA request, communication must be made with the requester to assist in making a proper request. -2018 Final Report
F5
Through Fiscal Year 2017-2018 there has been no consistent method of prioritizing the capital improvements for funding. -2018 Final Report Conclusion The Grand Jury believes the current process of transferring funds is justifiable and transparent. The addition of the outside consultant and the software program should increase efficiency and provide objectivity to the funding process for future capital improvements. The Grand Jury commends the CEO for their approach to developing a method of prioritizing the funding of capital improvements by use of the survey.
F6
responses. Lessons learned from the drills and responses are only debriefed verbally among districts. District superintendents leave it up to their principals to decide what that school's budget
F7
priorities are (books, athletic equipment, safety equipment, supplies for an extended shelter-in-place due to a disaster threatening the local school area, etc.) -2018 Final Report
F8
One school had snacks and water stored in each classroom in case there was an extended lockdown or shelter-in-place for the school if there was a nearby natural disaster. In addition, it also had an inexpensive backpack in each classroom to carry these items outside, along with other safety items such as a flashlight, radio, etc., if needed.
F9
Substitute teachers get inconsistent information about responding to various emergencies. a. They are at a disadvantage moving between districts because of lack of standardization of emergency plans. b. They must have their own cellphones to be notified in case of emergency while they are on the school campus. Due to the age of some schools, upgrading facilities to improve safety, such as doors
F10
that lock from the inside and reinforced glass, are large budget items which have to be prioritized with other needs at each school. While not state-mandated, PCOE initiated quarterly safety meetings, inviting all districts
F11
to attend. There is not a single, standardized emergency communication system used across the
F12
three reviewed school districts.
F13
Open campuses cannot account for students who leave the campus for lunch.
F14
The reviewed schools do work with their local first responders (fire, police, EMTs) and include them in emergency planning and training. However, there was no consistent training found for such potential disasters as train derailments, wildfires, and HAZMAT release. Conclusion By its nature, Placer County oversight is spread among various organizations responsible for emergency management systems, i.e., Office of Emergency Services, law enforcement agencies, CalFire, the impacted school district, etc. This decentralization may be detrimental in the event of a large scale incident that may last several days or impact several schools in one area. This is due to different terminology among responding agencies, different definitions of response kits, different communication systems, and different emergency response checklists. The SEMS checklist standardizes many of the above noted differences into a shared template. All involved parties will then have a common reference of the key items needed to remain focused to safeguard lives and property as the incident unfolds and eventually stabilizes. -2018 Final Report SEMS checklist also helps those individuals who fulfill unexpected roles during the emergency as to what to do, when, and how. Implementing the recommendations below would strengthen Placer County's response to a multi-jurisdictional incident, i.e., train derailment, HAZMAT release, or wildfire affecting schools. The dedication and knowledge of everyone interviewed who are responsible for keeping Placer County's children safe is inspiring. "Thank You" for the work you do every day with our future leaders/citizens.
Recommendations 12
-
R1Consider a dedicated unit to meet affordable housing requirements;
-
R2Provide a map of available properties within the county to assist in the development of affordable housing;
-
R3Simplify the process for developers to incorporate affordable housing;
-
R4Enforce the 10% affordable housing requirement when applicable;
-
R5Develop a consistent in-lieu fee that enables affordable housing; and
-
R6Focus future housing forums on local developments and include affordable alternatives. -2018 Final Report
-
R7All schools provide copies of their documented drills to their respective district superintendent.
-
R8District superintendents are commended for having structured meetings with their principals monthly, as well as visiting their campuses periodically.
-
R9Each classroom should have water, snacks, and sanitation supplies available in a convenient location for an extended lock-down or shelter-in-place. Example from Foresthill High School shown in (Figure 2). Supplies stored at Foresthill High School for emergency preparedness
-
R10Schools purchase cell phones connected to its respective internal communication systems for substitute teachers, volunteer staff, etc., to enhance their campus communication access during emergencies. School districts research the Federal Emergency Management Agency website for
-
R11applicable grant monies. (Source: https://www.fema.gov/grants) School districts consider sending educational staff to the Center for Domestic
-
R12Preparedness training site for additional skills necessary to respond to emergency/disaster events. Federal money is available to pay for training/transportation. (Source: (https://cdp.dhs.gov/) -2018 Final Report
Conclusions 11
-
CL1the Tahoe courthouse. Reassess the need of a Class II facility. Ninety-three inmates annually do not warrant an expenditure of this magnitude for a replacement facility at this time. Review the Nevada County contract for jail services.
-
CL2Examine the impact of the population increase in the area due to ongoing and planned
-
CL3construction projects. It is time for the Board of Supervisors to fulfill its commitments that have been made to the citizens of Placer County over the past thirty years to replace this facility.
-
CL4The County has taken positive steps to address the issue of affordable housing. We believe further actions are necessary.
-
CL5Two requests that were sent to the Placer County Sheriff's Office were not properly processed in accordance with the CPRA. There is no tracking system in place countywide indicating requests have been received. All requests, whether or not determined to be a valid CPRA request, should be tracked and responded to under the guidelines of the CPRA. If it is determined not to be a valid CPRA request, communication must be made with the requester to assist in making a proper request. Placer County Grand Jury 2017-2018 Final Report
-
CL6The Grand Jury believes the current process of transferring funds is justifiable and transparent. The addition of the outside consultant and the software program should increase efficiency and provide objectivity to the funding process for future capital improvements. The Grand Jury commends the CEO for their approach to developing a method of prioritizing the funding of capital improvements by use of the survey.
-
CL7By its nature, Placer County oversight is spread among various organizations responsible for emergency management systems, i.e., Office of Emergency Services, law enforcement agencies, CalFire, the impacted school district, etc. This decentralization may be detrimental in the event of a large scale incident that may last several days or impact several schools in one area. This is due to different terminology among responding agencies, different definitions of response kits, different communication systems, and different emergency response checklists. The SEMS checklist standardizes many of the above noted differences into a shared template. All involved parties will then have a common reference of the key items needed to remain focused to safeguard lives and property as the incident unfolds and eventually stabilizes. The Placer County Grand Jury 2017-2018 Final Report SEMS checklist also helps those individuals who fulfill unexpected roles during the emergency as to what to do, when, and how. Implementing the recommendations below would strengthen Placer County's response to a multi-jurisdictional incident, i.e., train derailment, HAZMAT release, or wildfire affecting schools. The dedication and knowledge of everyone interviewed who are responsible for keeping Placer County's children safe is inspiring. "Thank You" for the work you do every day with our future leaders/citizens.
-
CL8Placer County is not effectively enforcing the provisions of the 2008 Winery Ordinance. The foundation of its enforcement efforts is a voluntary compliance philosophy that is reactionary, relying upon citizen complaints before acting. However, the complaint process has created obstacles that discourage the public from reporting incidents. The lack of weekend staff results in the inability to immediately investigate. The tracking system is still not being used effectively. Also, the permit costs versus the violation fine may encourage wineries to avoid obtaining required permits. Placer County Grand Jury commends the CDRA for selecting and hiring new management who have a positive approach to resolving citizen complaints.
-
CL9The city's investment in RCDC has had a positive impact on downtown Roseville. The lack of tracking city employee time and resources devoted to the operation of RCDC makes it difficult to determine the true cost of this program. Establishing a means of documenting employee involvement in RCDC would enhance public transparency as well as ensure that public funds are spent appropriately. The city describes RCDC as a public/private partnership. Every city official interviewed insisted the corporation is independent of city operations. This independence is necessary in order for RCDC to operate outside of governmental regulations. In practice, it appears that RCDC functions more as a privatized extension of the city. The use of city employees to manage and operate RCDC and the city manager's evaluation and establishment of RCDC goals for the Economic Development Director raise concerns regarding RCDC's independence. Placer County Grand Jury 2017-2018 Final Report
-
CL10The Placer County Grand Jury commends the staff and management of the JDF for their efforts in providing a clean, healthy environment for juveniles. Their commitment to the mission of the organization and to the individual juveniles is apparent in their actions and programs. Education, mentoring, and counseling services are provided to prepare juveniles to be productive members of society.
-
CL11During the course of the inspections, we found the staff of all facilities to be knowledgeable, accommodating, and professional. Both SPACF and the Auburn Main Jail were properly maintained and provided for the needs of the inmates. The temporary court holding facilities provided proper security and accommodations for inmates awaiting hearings. One concern that was identified is the substantial population increase that will occur from the two large development projects approved for the Tahoe region. This increase will further strain the Burton Creek facility. Steps need to be taken now in order to rectify the insufficiencies of the facility. Over the past twenty years this facility has been identified by the Grand Jury as inadequate and unsafe. It is time for the Board of Supervisors to take a serious look at replacing the Burton Creek facility. Continuing to ignore the Grand Jury's recommendations to replace this facility puts both the public and the employees' safety at risk. Placer County Grand Jury 2017-2018 Final Report Request for Responses:
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.