📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Plumas County Grand Jury • 2005-2006

Plumas County

Published: September 29, 2006 2 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 6 findings

F1 Page 18
The "Animal Control Safety Guidelines" manual is incomplete. There is no written Departmental policy or procedure on accidental needle sticks. Also, the "Animal Control General Orders" manual is incomplete. There is no written Departmental procedure on euthanasia.
F2 Page 18
The Animal Control Department is under the supervision of the Sheriff's Department. Employees of Animal Control are represented by the Operating Engineers Union whereas the employees of the Sheriff's Department are members of the Sheriff's Association. These two entities have different standards and operating practices.
F3 Page 18
Many of the laws applicable to the Animal Control Department fall under the Agricultural Code rather than the Penal Code.
F4 Page 18
On average, Staff meetings are held only once per year.
F5 Page 18
Animal Control General Order Section III, A-10., states that "the pens shall be cleaned and the animals checked for food and water every 24 hours, minimally". This policy is not being followed. There is one day per week where no employee is scheduled to care for or feed the animals.
F6 Page 18
Dosages for euthanasia drugs are determined by animal weight. There is no scale to weigh the animals. 17

Recommendations 6

Commendations 4