📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Orange County Grand Jury
• 2016-2017
Our Brothers’ Keeper: a Look at the Care and Treatment of Mentally Ill Inmates in Orange County Jails assurance
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 22 findings
F1
Page 41
Mod L, located in the Intake and Release Center, has an insufficient number of beds to accommodate all mentally ill inmates who would benefit from regular interaction with medical, psychiatric, nursing, and case management services. The lack of bed space for the number of mentally ill inmates who need acute services supports the Department of Justice concern that the jail needs to act to prevent mental health crises and provide adequate transition programs, not just to deal with the most immediate urgent needs.
F2
Page 41
Correctional Health Services provides minimal mental health treatment services in the form of therapy groups to less than 1% of the total jail population diagnosed with some type of mental illness, which precludes therapeutic treatment to most mentally ill inmates.
F3
Page 41
The Intake and Release Center has no system for ensuring humane treatment of an inmate in a safety cell. Examples include: the inmates are cold, they sleep next to a grate that is used as a toilet, and no water is available for the inmate to wash hands after the use of the toilet and prior to eating meals.
F4
Page 41
Correctional Health Services uses the safety cell as a substitute for treatment. There are no measurable and observable criteria for moving someone into a safety cell, or immediately removing inmates when they are no longer a threat to themselves or others, which has the potential to result in the use of safety cells for disciplinary purposes.
F5
Page 41
A psychiatrist is the only person authorized to remove an inmate from a safety cell, however, one is not always available to do so, which may result in a longer term of confinement than necessary.
F6
Page 41
Correctional Health Services staff does not hold a debriefing meeting after each use of the safety cell. Therefore, CHS is unable to identify how the treatment failure occurred and to help prevent future occurrences, including suicide attempts. 2015-2016 Orange County Grand Jury Our Brothers’ Keeper: A Look at the Care and Treatment of Mentally Ill Inmates in Orange County Jails
F7
Page 42
Neither Correctional Health Services nor Sheriff’s Department staff collects or analyzes data related to safety cell usage other than how often it is used, and therefore, neither has any quality improvement or risk management activities to assist in reducing safety cell use.
F8
Page 42
The Orange County Jail does not have a Restoration of Competency treatment program, to the detriment of inmates declared incompetent to stand trial by the courts. Wait time for transfer to a state hospital does not meet the directive of the court system to transfer within 30-35 days.
F9
Page 42
Data demonstrates that the Collaborative and Community Courts provide effective treatment services for mentally ill offenders who qualify for the programs.
F10
Page 42
Collaborative Courts save the County a significant amount of money in decreased incarceration and recidivism rates.
F11
Page 42
The current number of jail psychiatrists is not sufficient to meet the needs of the general inmate population diagnosed with mental illness. This shortage has resulted in extended periods of time inmates spend in safety cells, as well as a lack of psychiatric services in all but a very small portion of the Orange County Jails. The Department of Justice findings support the concern that therapeutic treatment may not reach prisoners who may be quite ill, but are not the most obviously in need of mental health care.
F12
Page 42
Orange County has become a model for successful implementation of Laura’s Law in the State of California. Behavioral Health Services keeps comprehensive statistics on all aspects of Laura’s Law and therefore can effectively analyze the program’s strengths and weaknesses.
F13
Page 42
Correctional Health Services does not provide therapeutic treatment services to inmates with a chronic mental health diagnosis in most parts of Mod L or in any of the general jail housing. This small concentration of service supports the Department of Justice concern that the jail does not provide for a cohesive system of therapy and treatment.
F14
Page 42
There is a lack of adequate classroom space to conduct educational classes for inmates who would benefit from participation in inmate services programs.
F15
Page 42
Correctional Health Services has no written guidelines, no formal course of study, and no specific training for case managers or nursing staff who conduct group therapy sessions on Mod L Crisis Stabilization Unit.
F16
Page 42
Sixteen beds in Ward D are insufficient to meet the needs of the large number of inmates with chronic mental health issues outside of Mod L. 2015-2016 Orange County Grand Jury Our Brothers’ Keeper: A Look at the Care and Treatment of Mentally Ill Inmates in Orange County Jails
F17
Page 43
Although the Sheriff’s Department has a Memorandum of Understanding with the Health Care Agency to provide mental health care services to Orange County jail inmates, the two entities do not have a formal system in place for sharing mental health data that affects both entities.
F18
Page 43
The Jail Compliance and Training Team, made up of Sheriff’s Department personnel, does not include anyone with a Quality Assurance background. Although the Jail Compliance and Training Team completes standard reports and provides them to Sheriff’s Command staff, it does not consistently collect and analyze data over time to identify trends.
F19
Page 46
R.17. The Health Care Agency/Correctional Health Services should review its quality management committee structure by December 31, 2016 to ensure issues identified in reports are thoroughly analyzed. Trends should be identified and addressed through quality improvement activities. The minutes of the meeting should reflect committee discussion and decisions regarding trends. Minutes should also reflect follow-up actions taken to ensure resolution of identified issues.
F20
Page 43
The Health Care Agency/Correctional Health Services collects health care related grievance data and presents it to the Quality Management Committee on a regular basis, however, the data is not formally analyzed to identify trends and the Quality Management Committee minutes do not demonstrate discussion on the implementation of quality improvement activities based on the data presented.
F21
Page 43
Neither the Sheriff’s Department or Correctional Health Services has developed and initiated a formal process to address or track lingering issues identified in the 2014 Department of Justice correspondence. Additionally, they do not have a formal system in place to track improvement plans that may have been put into place to correct Department of Justice concerns.
F22
Page 43
The Crisis Stabilization Unit does not have a system in place to collect or analyze data. Additionally, they do not have any formal quality improvement activities specific to Mod L treatment services, and therefore are unable to objectively evaluate the effectiveness of therapy groups. 2015-2016 Orange County Grand Jury Our Brothers’ Keeper: A Look at the Care and Treatment of Mentally Ill Inmates in Orange County Jails RECOMMENDATIONS In accordance with California Penal Code Sections 933 and 933.05, the 2015-2016 Grand Jury requires (or, as noted, requests) responses from each agency affected by the recommendations presented in this section. The responses are to be submitted to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court. Based on its investigation titled “OUR BROTHERS’ KEEPER: A Look at the Care and Treatment of Mentally Ill Inmates in Orange County Jails,” the 2015-2016 Orange County Grand Jury makes the following 17 recommendations:
Recommendations 17
-
R1Page 44The Sheriff’s Department should establish an ad hoc committee by December 31, 2016 to review space utilization in the Intake and Release Center with the goal of establishing additional units where inmates with mental health issues can be housed in closer proximity. F1, F16, F21
-
R2Page 44The Health Care Agency/Correctional Health Services should develop a therapeutic program by October 31, 2017 that includes a formal course of studies to include all inmates in Mod L, and provide training to facilitators to ensure consistency. F2, F13, F15, F21
-
R3Page 44The Health Care Agency/Correctional Health Services should develop a process by December 31, 2016 to ensure that safety cell entrance and exit criteria are clearly defined, measurable, and observable. F4, F5, F6, F21
-
R4Page 44The Sheriff’s Department and the Health Care Agency/Correctional Health Services should implement a protocol to ensure an inmate in a safety cell has access to water for washing hands after using the toilet and before and after meals by September 30, 2016. F3, F21
-
R5Page 44The Sheriff’s Department should develop a plan to eliminate the environmental issue of inmates being excessively cold in safety cells
-
R6Page 44The Health Care Agency/Correctional Health Services should develop a protocol by December 31, 2016 to authorize nurse practitioners to release inmates from a safety cell. F5, F21 2015-2016 Orange County Grand Jury Our Brothers’ Keeper: A Look at the Care and Treatment of Mentally Ill Inmates in Orange County Jails
-
R7Page 45The Health Care Agency/Correctional Health Services should establish a debriefing protocol by December 31, 2016 to address each safety cell use in order to properly evaluate any treatment failure and put a plan in place to reduce reoccurrence. F6, F21
-
R8Page 45The Sheriff’s Department and the Health Care Agency/Correctional Health Services should collaborate on a process by December 31, 2016 to collect and analyze the following safety cell data: the average length of stay the number of times an inmate is moved to the safety cell more than once the day and times safety cells are most utilized any injury sustained on the way to, or inside the safety cell the use of forced medication in conjunction with safety cell use Data should be incorporated into risk reduction activities that are monitored by the Sheriff’s Department and the Health Care Agency/Correctional Health Services. F7, F17, F18, F21
-
R9Page 45The County should provide financial assistance through the budgetary process, or some other means such as the Mental Health Services Act (Prop 63) by June 30, 2017, for additional Collaborative Court services that can reduce the current wait list and serve a greater number and variety of mentally ill offenders. F9, F10
-
R10Page 45The Health Care Agency should develop a recruitment strategy for hiring additional full time psychiatrists by December 31, 2016, in order to better meet the needs of mentally ill inmates throughout the Orange County jails. F11, F21
-
R11Page 45The Health Care Agency/Correctional Health Services should develop and implement therapeutic and educational curricula specific to the needs of mentally ill inmates in all parts of the Orange County jails by June 30, 2017. F2, F13, F15, F21
-
R12Page 45The Sheriff’s Department and the Health Care Agency should collaborate to initiate Thinking for a Change, or a similar therapeutic program, in all areas of the jail, including Mod L, by June 30, 2017, and give first priority to inmates with a mental health diagnosis. F2, F13, F14, F21 2015-2016 Orange County Grand Jury Our Brothers’ Keeper: A Look at the Care and Treatment of Mentally Ill Inmates in Orange County Jails
-
R13Page 46The Sheriff’s Department and the Health Care Agency/Correctional Health Services should integrate quality assurance data into their regular standing meetings, or establish a new standing committee by December 31, 2016, where the data includes: use of safety cells the effectiveness of transfers out of Mod L into the general jail population inmate grievances F17, F19, F20, F21
-
R14Page 46The Sheriff’s Department should expand the S.A.F.E. division to include a quality risk management team that will collect and analyze data throughout the jail, with a component that will address services provided to mentally ill inmates by June 30, 2017. Consideration of expansion should include incorporating the Jail Compliance and Training Team (JCATT) into S.A.F.E. F18, F21
-
R15Page 46The Sheriff’s Department should establish a standing quality management committee that meets at least quarterly to review and analyze data with the goal of improving inmate services by December 31, 2016. The Committee should include representatives from Command Staff, S.A.F.E., JCATT, and Mod L medical, nursing, and case management staff. F18, F19, F21
-
R16Page 46The Sheriff’s Department should develop and implement a plan by December 31, 2016 to ensure that the jail grievance policy and procedure is followed. F19
-
R17Page 46The Health Care Agency/Correctional Health Services should review its quality management committee structure by December 31, 2016 to ensure issues identified in reports are thoroughly analyzed. Trends should be identified and addressed through quality improvement activities. The minutes of the meeting should reflect committee discussion and decisions regarding trends. Minutes should also reflect follow-up actions taken to ensure resolution of identified issues. F20, F21, F22 REQUIRED RESPONSES The California Penal Code section 933 requires the governing body of any public agency which the Grand Jury has reviewed, and about which it has issued a final report, to comment to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the governing body. Such comment shall be made no later than 90 days after the Grand Jury publishes its report (filed with the Clerk of the Court). Additionally, in the case of 2015-2016 Orange County Grand Jury Our Brothers’ Keeper: A Look at the Care and Treatment of Mentally Ill Inmates in Orange County Jails a report containing findings and recommendations pertaining to a department or agency headed by an elected County official (e.g. District Attorney, Sheriff, etc.), such elected County official shall comment on the findings and recommendations pertaining to the matters under that elected official’s control to the Presiding Judge with an information copy sent to the Board of Supervisors. Furthermore, California Penal Code Section 933.05 subdivisions (a), (b), and (c), detail, as follows, the manner in which such comment(s) is to be made: (a) As to each Grand Jury finding, the responding person or entity shall indicate one of the following: (1) The respondent agrees with the finding. (2) The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefor. (b) As to each Grand Jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall report one of the following actions: (1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action. (2) The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a time frame for implementation. (3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This time frame shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the Grand Jury report. (4) The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefor. (c) If a finding or recommendation of the Grand Jury addresses budgetary or personnel matters of a county agency or department headed by an elected officer, both the agency or department head and the Board of Supervisors shall respond if requested by the Grand Jury, but the response of the Board of Supervisors shall address only those budgetary /or personnel matters over which it has some decision making authority. The response of the elected agency or department head shall address all aspects of the findings or recommendations affecting his or her agency or department. 2015-2016 Orange County Grand Jury Our Brothers’ Keeper: A Look at the Care and Treatment of Mentally Ill Inmates in Orange County Jails Comments to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court in compliance with Penal Code section §933.05 are required from: Responses Required: Responses are required from the following governing bodies of the date of the publication of this report: 90 Day Response F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F Required: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Board of Supervisors X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 90 Day Response R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R Required: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Board of Supervisors X X X X X X X X X X X X Responses are required from the following elected agency or department head of the date of the publication of this report: 60 Day Response F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F Required: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Sheriff/Coroner X X X X X X X X X X X X 60 Day Response R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R Required: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 OC Sheriff X X X X X X X X X Responses Requested: Responses are requested from the following non-elected agency or department heads: Response F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F F Requested: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Health Care Agency X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Response R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R Requested: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Health Care Agency X X X X X X X X X X X 2015-2016 Orange County Grand Jury Our Brothers’ Keeper: A Look at the Care and Treatment of Mentally Ill Inmates in Orange County Jails WORKS CITED California Code of Regulations, Title 15 (§1073 – Inmate Grievance Process, §1083 – Limitations on Disciplinary Actions, and §1055 – Use of Safety Cell). Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Crime Prevention and Corrections. Web. California Corrections Standards Authority: Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Council on Mentally Ill Offenders. (2009), “Jails and the Mentally Ill: Issues and Analysis.” Web. Sept. 2015. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. The Cornerstone of California’s Solution to Reduce Overcrowding, Costs, and Recidivism. AB109. Web. 2011. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. What You Need to Know About Proposition 47. Web. Nov. 2014. California Department of Mental Health. October 2010 (revised). “The Forensic Conditional Release Program: An Orientation Guide.” Web. Sept. 2015. California Legislative Information. Assembly Bill (AB) -1907, Chapter 814 “Inmates: Psychiatric Medication.” (Laura’s Law) Web. September 30, 2012. California Legislative Information. Welfare and Institution Code Division 5, Part 1 the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act [5000 - 5550]. Chapter 2. Involuntary Treatment [5150 - 5349.5]. California Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST). Learning Domain 37. Print. Crime Solution.gov. Office of Justice Programs. Program Profile. Thinking for a Change. Web. 2016. Department of Justice /Civil Rights Division. Correspondence. March 4, 2014. “Investigation of the Orange County Jail.” DJ 168-12C-90. Print. Dusky v United States: 362 U.S. 402 (1960). Gerda, Nick. “Orange County Adopts Laura’s Law” Voice of OC. 5/14/14. Web. Gerda, Nick. “Supervisors Get an Earful on County Mental Health System Deficiencies.” Voice of OC. 3/29/16. Web. Human Resource Services. Current Salary Schedules. OCgov.com. 2016. 2015-2016 Orange County Grand Jury Our Brothers’ Keeper: A Look at the Care and Treatment of Mentally Ill Inmates in Orange County Jails IN RE MILLE. Cal.App.4th 635 (2010), 105 Cal. Rptr. 3d 859. In re FREDDY MILLE on Habeas Corpus. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three. March 3, 2010. Jackson v Indiana: 406 U.S. 715 (1972). Joint Settlement Agreement Regarding the Los Angeles County Jails; and Stipulated Order of Resolution. Filed August 5, 2015. Case 2:15-cv-05903 Web. Nov. 2015. Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Law, Restraint and Seclusion, Web. Bazelon.org. 2016. Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO). January 3, 2012.” An Alternative Approach: Treating the Incompetent to Stand Trial.” Web. Nov. 2015. National Alliance on Mental Health (NAMI). Mental Health Conditions. Web. 2016. Orange County Grand Jury - 2012-2013. “To Protect And To Serve: A Look at Tools to Assist Law Enforcement in Achieving Positive Outcomes With the Homeless Mentally Ill.” Print. 2013. Orange County Health Care Agency. “Assisted Outpatient Treatment.” Print. 2016. Orange County Sheriff-Coroner Department/S.A.F.E. Division. “SAFE – Strategy. Accountability. Focus. Evaluation.” Web. Sept. 2015. Robinson v California. U.S. 660 (1962). Sell v United States, 539 U.S. 166 (2003). Steinberg, Darrell, et al. Stanford Law School Three Strikes Project (2014). “When did prisons become acceptable mental healthcare facilities?” Web. Sept. 2015. Stepping Up Initiative. Web. May 2016. Superior Court of California, County of Orange. 2014. “Collaborative Courts 2014 Annual Report.” Print. Superior Court of California, County of Orange. 2015. “Collaborative Courts 2015 Annual Report.” Print. Treatment Advocacy Center. “The Treatment of Persons with Mental Illness in Prisons and Jails: A State Survey.” April 8, 2014. P. 9-12. United States of America v County of Los Angeles and Los Angeles County Sheriff Jim McDonald, in his Official Capacity. Joint Settlement Agreement regarding the Los 2015-2016 Orange County Grand Jury Our Brothers’ Keeper: A Look at the Care and Treatment of Mentally Ill Inmates in Orange County Jails Angeles County Jails; and Stipulated (Proposed) Order of Resolution. C.V No. 15-5903. 2015. Urban Institute. Research Report. The Processing and Treatment of Mentally Ill Persons in the Criminal Justice System. A Scan of Practice and Background Analysis. Web. 2015. Vo, Thy. “County Leaders to Attend Summit on Reducing Incarceration of Mentally Ill.” Voice of OC. March 2016. Web. 2015-2016 Orange County Grand Jury Our Brothers’ Keeper: A Look at the Care and Treatment of Mentally Ill Inmates in Orange County Jails WORKS CONSULTED Auerback, Alfred, M.D. The Short-Doyle Act. Web. Nov. 2015. Assembly Bill 1907. California Legislature. 2011-12 regular session. California Code of Regulations, Title 9, Division 1, Chapter 4 - Community Mental Health Services Under the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act. Web. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Armstrong v Brown Board of Parole Hearings Remedial Plan. Web. Amended December 1, 2010. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Proposition 47. “Reduced Penalties for Some Crimes Initiative (November 2014). California Legislative Information. Assembly Bill 1907 (Penal Code 1602 and 1603). Inmates: Psychiatric Medication. September 30, 2012. California Penal Code, Section 13515.25. Print. California Penal Code, Section 1368. Print. California Welfare and Institutions Codes 5325.2. “Persons subject to detention pursuant to 5150, 5250, 5260, 5270.15; right to refuse psychiatric medication.” Print. Connolly, Stephen, Stephen J. County of Orange Office of the Performance Audit Director. Annual Audit Recommendations Follow-Up: Health Care Agency/Correctional Health Services. Web (ocgov.com). December 16, 2014. Connolly, Stephen J. County of Orange Office of Independent Review. “Department of Justice Investigation Update.” Web (OC gov.com). May 21, 2014. Connolly, Stephen J., County of Orange Office of the Performance Audit Director. “Follow-up Audit of Health Care Agency/Correctional Medical Services. Web (OCgov.com). January 24, 2012. Correctional Services Assistant (CSA) Academy and Continuing Professional Training. “Training Curriculum for Basic Academy.” Orange County Sheriff’s Department, CA. Web. Unit 15. Dalton, Rex. “County Seeking State Money for Jail Rebuild.” Voice of OC. Web. Nov. 2015. Disability Rights California (DRC). “Placement of Individuals Found Incompetent to Stand Trial: A Review of Competency Programs and Recommendations.” Publication #CM52.01. Web. Oct. 2015. 2015-2016 Orange County Grand Jury Our Brothers’ Keeper: A Look at the Care and Treatment of Mentally Ill Inmates in Orange County Jails Fillman, Terry. CSAC 119th Annual Meeting Healthy Counties – Healthy California. “Restoration of Competency Jail Based Program Saves Time and Money.” Web (www.docfoc.com). Fillman, Terry. “Mental Health Treatment: Award Winning Innovation.” San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department. 2014. Keyhea v Rushen. Cal. App. 3d 531. Little Hoover Commission. “Commission Calls for Stronger Oversight, Better Financial Reporting to Document Impact of ‘Millionaire’s Tax’ on Mental Health in California.” Print. January 27, 2015. Loewy, Arnold. “Criminal Law in a Nutshell, Fourth Edition.” West Group. Print. 2003. Los Angeles Times. “Settlement Calls for More Training, Scrutiny.” August 6, 2014. Web. Dec. 2015. Moodlan, Margaret. “The Shameful State of the Mentally Ill in Our Jail System.” Huffington Post. Web. Dec. 2015. National Alliance on Mental Health State Advocacy. “The High Cost of Cutting Mental Health.” Web. Oct. 2015. Napa State Hospital Court Competency Packet. Web. Oct. 2015. Orange County Grand Jury – 2014-2015. “The Mental Illness Revolving Door: A Problem For Police, Hospitals, and the Health Care Agency.” Orange County Register. “County Answers Plea for More Mental Health Care.” June 6, 2015. Orange County Register. “Inmate Programs Concern Grand Jury,” June 9, 2013. Web. Oct. 2015. Pace Law School Library Research Guides. “Prisoners’ Rights Law Resources: Mental Health. 2015. Web. Dec. 2015. Pierce v County of Orange. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. March 24, 2008. Rehinge. “Paton’s Story.” Web. January 2016. Souse California Law Group. “Competency to Stand Trial in California Criminal Law.” Web. January 2015. St. John, Paige. “Report Faults Prison Care of State’s Mentally Ill Inmate.” Los Angeles Times, 2016. Web. October 2015. 2015-2016 Orange County Grand Jury Our Brothers’ Keeper: A Look at the Care and Treatment of Mentally Ill Inmates in Orange County Jails “State Divides $500 Million Among County Jails For Rehabilitation Programs.” November 11, 2015. Web. November 2015. Superior Court of California County of Orange. Community Court Programs and Services. StudyLib. Riese Hearing Basics. Codes and Regulations related to Capacity Hearings. Welfare and Institutions Codes. Web. 2016. Taylor, Mac. “An Alternative Approach: Treating the Incompetent to Stand Trial.” 2012. Legislative Analyst’s Office. Web. Nov. 2015. Telecare Corporation. Web. Oct. 2015. Tenorio, Gina. The Patch. San Bernardino Sheriff’s Honored for Work with Inmates. Web. March 21, 2013. Treatment Advocacy Center. “California.” 2012. Web. Oct. 2015. Treatment Advocacy Center. “The Treatment of Persons with Mental Illness in Prisons and Jails: A State Survey 2014.” Oct. 2015. United States Attorney’s Office Department of Justice. Justice Department Reaches Agreement with Los Angeles County To Implement Sweeping Reforms on Mental Health Care and Use of Force throughout the County Jail System. Web. Aug 5, 2015. Wood, Tracy. “Moorlach Bill Would Boost Local Access to Mental Health Funds.” Voice of OC. Web. Mar. 2016. 2015-2016 Orange County Grand Jury Our Brothers’ Keeper: A Look at the Care and Treatment of Mentally Ill Inmates in Orange County Jails