Orange County Grand Jury • 2012-2013

To Protect And To Serve: a Look at Tools to Assist Law Enforcement in Achieving Positive Outcomes with the Homeless

32 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 11 findings

F1
Although POST requires continuing education in the area of dealing with individuals who are mentally ill, it does not specify the number of hours or frequency of officer training; nor does it require that such training be documented.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Require specific continuing education for all police officers and sheriff‟s deputies in interacting with the mentally ill and homeless population: Orange County City Police Chiefs and the Sheriff-Coroner shall corroborate with the Orange County Chiefs and Sheriff‟s Association to set the type, hours and frequency of this supplemental training; Include Crisis Intervention Training (perhaps the Memphis model); Training is to be documented. (F1,F2,F3,F4,F5,F6,F7,F8,F10)
F2
Field officers desire more in-depth training in dealing with the mentally ill on the street. (Interviews)
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Require specific continuing education for all police officers and sheriff‟s deputies in interacting with the mentally ill and homeless population: Orange County City Police Chiefs and the Sheriff-Coroner shall corroborate with the Orange County Chiefs and Sheriff‟s Association to set the type, hours and frequency of this supplemental training; Include Crisis Intervention Training (perhaps the Memphis model); Training is to be documented. (F1,F2,F3,F4,F5,F6,F7,F8,F10)
F3
There is one officer – in a very few instances two officers – for every one thousand (1,000) citizens in a given city within the County who are expected to deal with the full range of law enforcement issues of that city.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Require specific continuing education for all police officers and sheriff‟s deputies in interacting with the mentally ill and homeless population: Orange County City Police Chiefs and the Sheriff-Coroner shall corroborate with the Orange County Chiefs and Sheriff‟s Association to set the type, hours and frequency of this supplemental training; Include Crisis Intervention Training (perhaps the Memphis model); Training is to be documented. (F1,F2,F3,F4,F5,F6,F7,F8,F10)
F4
Nationally accredited police departments police less than 10% of Orange County cities.
Related Recommendations (2)
R1
Require specific continuing education for all police officers and sheriff‟s deputies in interacting with the mentally ill and homeless population: Orange County City Police Chiefs and the Sheriff-Coroner shall corroborate with the Orange County Chiefs and Sheriff‟s Association to set the type, hours and frequency of this supplemental training; Include Crisis Intervention Training (perhaps the Memphis model); Training is to be documented. (F1,F2,F3,F4,F5,F6,F7,F8,F10)
R2
All Orange County City Police Departments and the Sheriff‟s Department shall be accredited with a national accreditation agency within five (5) years. (F4)
F5
Not all Orange County cities have at least one officer trained in Crisis Intervention.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Require specific continuing education for all police officers and sheriff‟s deputies in interacting with the mentally ill and homeless population: Orange County City Police Chiefs and the Sheriff-Coroner shall corroborate with the Orange County Chiefs and Sheriff‟s Association to set the type, hours and frequency of this supplemental training; Include Crisis Intervention Training (perhaps the Memphis model); Training is to be documented. (F1,F2,F3,F4,F5,F6,F7,F8,F10)
F6
There is a broad spectrum of on-going training provided to patrol officers in order to develop their abilities and strategies in dealing with the mentally ill. Some departments provide minimal training; others have comprehensive programs in place.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Require specific continuing education for all police officers and sheriff‟s deputies in interacting with the mentally ill and homeless population: Orange County City Police Chiefs and the Sheriff-Coroner shall corroborate with the Orange County Chiefs and Sheriff‟s Association to set the type, hours and frequency of this supplemental training; Include Crisis Intervention Training (perhaps the Memphis model); Training is to be documented. (F1,F2,F3,F4,F5,F6,F7,F8,F10)
F7
Five departments have their patrol officers ride periodically with the homeless liaison officer. Seventeen do not.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Require specific continuing education for all police officers and sheriff‟s deputies in interacting with the mentally ill and homeless population: Orange County City Police Chiefs and the Sheriff-Coroner shall corroborate with the Orange County Chiefs and Sheriff‟s Association to set the type, hours and frequency of this supplemental training; Include Crisis Intervention Training (perhaps the Memphis model); Training is to be documented. (F1,F2,F3,F4,F5,F6,F7,F8,F10)
F8
Departments are reaching out – or beginning to reach out – to neighboring departments and to other skilled professionals, both in dialogue about the mentally ill and homeless issues in their cities, and to learn more effective strategies in dealing with these individuals.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Require specific continuing education for all police officers and sheriff‟s deputies in interacting with the mentally ill and homeless population: Orange County City Police Chiefs and the Sheriff-Coroner shall corroborate with the Orange County Chiefs and Sheriff‟s Association to set the type, hours and frequency of this supplemental training; Include Crisis Intervention Training (perhaps the Memphis model); Training is to be documented. (F1,F2,F3,F4,F5,F6,F7,F8,F10)
F9
All police departments believe that on-going training should be supported by Mental Health Services Act funding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The Orange County Department of Mental Health Services and the Orange County Board of Supervisors shall provide funding for on-going police officer training through Mental Health Services Act funding. (F9) REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS: The California Penal Code §933 requires any public agency which the Grand Jury has reviewed, and about which it has issued a final report, to comment to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court on the findings and recommendations pertaining to matters under the control of the agency. Such comment shall be made no later than 90 days after the Grand Jury publishes its report (filed with the Clerk of the Court); except that in the case of a report containing findings and recommendations pertaining with the Homeless Mentally Ill to a department or agency headed by an elected County official (e.g. District Attorney, Sheriff, etc.), such comment shall be made to the Presiding Judge with an information copy sent to the Board of Supervisors. Furthermore, California Penal Code Section §933.05 (a), (b), (c), details, as follows, the manner in which such comment(s) are to be made: (a) As to each Grand Jury finding, the responding person or entity shall indicate one of the following: (1) The respondent agrees with the finding (2) The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding, in which case the response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons therefore. (b) As to each Grand Jury recommendation, the responding person or entity shall report one of the following actions: (1) The recommendation has been implemented, with a summary regarding the implemented action. (2) The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future, with a time frame for implementation. (3) The recommendation requires further analysis, with an explanation and the scope and parameters of an analysis or study, and a time frame for the matter to be prepared for discussion by the officer or head of the agency or department being investigated or reviewed, including the governing body of the public agency when applicable. This time frame shall not exceed six months from the date of publication of the Grand Jury report. (4) The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable, with an explanation therefore. (c) If a finding or recommendation of the Grand Jury addresses budgetary or personnel matters of a county agency or department headed by an elected officer, both the agency or department head and the Board of Supervisors shall respond if requested by the Grand Jury, but the response of the Board of Supervisors shall address only those budgetary /or personnel matters over which it has some decision making aspects of the
F10
All police departments adhere to written policy, procedure and/or protocol regarding contact with mentally ill persons.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Require specific continuing education for all police officers and sheriff‟s deputies in interacting with the mentally ill and homeless population: Orange County City Police Chiefs and the Sheriff-Coroner shall corroborate with the Orange County Chiefs and Sheriff‟s Association to set the type, hours and frequency of this supplemental training; Include Crisis Intervention Training (perhaps the Memphis model); Training is to be documented. (F1,F2,F3,F4,F5,F6,F7,F8,F10)
F11
Policy and lawmakers in the County of Orange continue to examine Laura‟s Law in light of its potential impact on the mentally ill and all citizens for positive outcomes. with the Homeless Mentally Ill
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The County of Orange Board of Supervisors shall implement a pilot program for Laura‟s Law with the necessary accommodations to insure that the program will function effectively as an essential tool to help those with mental illness, thus benefiting law enforcement, and the citizens of Orange County. (F11)

Commendations 1

Agency Responses 20

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.