Score: -3 (5/5/8)
Santa Barbara County Grand Jury • 2022-2023

A Death In Custody – Lessons Learned*

Published: July 12, 2023 31 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 7 findings

F1
Under the existing agreement between the County and Wellpath, Santa Barbara County does not provide mental health professional care onsite in the Jails from 11 p.m. to 7 a.m. See n 465.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
That by the end of the second quarter of FY 2023-24, Santa Barbara County amend the existing agreement between the County and Wellpath to provide Jail inmates, in both the north and south facilities, with overnight (24/7) mental health professional onsite services.
F2
Wellpath medical staff do not receive advanced training on mental health crisis intervention, which can be critical in circumstances when mental health staff are not on duty or not otherwise available and is required under a federal court order.
Related Recommendations (3)
R2
Whether the custody staff followed Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office training policies when they employed the on-stomach prone restraint hold on JT. REQUEST FOR RESPONSE Pursuant to California Penal Code Section 933 and 933.05, the Santa Barbara County Jury requests each entity or individual named below to respond to the enumerated findings and recommendations within the specified statutory time limit: Responses to Findings shall be either: Agree; Disagree wholly; or Disagree partially with an explanation. Responses to Recommendations shall be one of the following: Has been implemented, with brief summary of implementation actions taken; Will be implemented, with an implementation schedule; .
R2a
That by the end of the first quarter of 2023-24, Santa Barbara County amend the existing agreement between the County and Wellpath (or its successor) to provide all medical staff with advanced 40-hour mental health crisis response training.
R2b
That by the end of the first quarter of 2023-24, Santa Barbara County amend the existing agreement between the County and Wellpath (or its successors) that requires Wellpath medical staff, when faced with an emergent or urgent mental health case when Wellpath mental health staff is not on duty or available, to be trained on how to obtain outside assistance from a) senior regional Wellpath mental health staff and/or b) an available County Behavioral Wellness Crisis Management Team.
F3
The majority of the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office custody staff hired pre-2021 have not been provided 40-hour mental health crisis response training. Although the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office offers an advanced mental health 40-hour training course for members of its patrol co-response teams and for Santa Barbara County · . · · ٠. Sheriff's Office custody staff recent hires, it does not mandate this for custodial staff hired before 2021.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
That by the end of the first quarter of FY 2023-24, Santa Barbara County and Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office provide funding so that the Sheriff's Office implement effective advanced mental health crisis response training consisting of at least 40 hours of instruction and annual refresher training consisting of at least eight-hours for its custody staff.
F4a
JT's mental health crisis was not adequately evaluated at the local hospital because municipal law enforcement patrol officers did not share with hospital staff available vital information of JT's suicidal threats and ideation.
No recommendations for this finding
F4b
All cities in Santa Barbara County with their own police departments, i.e., cities of Guadalupe, Lompoc, Santa Barbara, and Santa Maria, and the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office patrol officers and supervisory personnel would benefit from advanced mental health crisis response training consisting of at least 40 hours of instruction and annual refresher training consisting of at least eight-hours.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Lawfully shared data collection and analysis among multiple Santa Barbara County law enforcement agencies (Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office, Santa Barbara County District Attorney's Office, Santa Barbara County Public Defender, Santa Barbara County Probation Department), the municipal police departments in Santa Barbara County (Guadalupe, Lompoc, Santa Barbara, and Santa Maria), mental health (County Behavioral Wellness) and public health (County Public Health) agencies would provide relevant county personnel with better tools to effectively serve community members with mental health illness.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
That by the end of the first quarter of 2024 Santa Barbara County, the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Office, Santa Barbara County District Attorney's Office, Santa Barbara County Public Defender, Santa Barbara County Probation Department, and all local municipal city councils with police agencies (Guadalupe, Lompoc, Santa Barbara, and Santa Maria), mental health (County Behavioral Wellness), and public health (County Public Health) agencies adopt relevant recommendations for more effective data sharing in the referenced San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) study.58
F6
The Santa Barbara County Sheriff-Coroner investigation and the District Attorney's Office review of the medical cause and manner of JT's death that left the Jury with questions: 58 See fn 6. ٠, a) whether within reasonable medical certainty, the custody staff's use of on-stomach prone restraint and JT's vigorous resistance to it was the direct cause of JT's cardiac arrest; and b) whether the custody staff followed Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office training policies when they employed the on-stomach prone restraint hold on JT.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
That the County of Santa Barbara and the Sheriff-Coroner's Office request an independent review from the State Attorney General of all facts and circumstances leading up to the death-in-custody of JT, and any legal consequences that result from that review to include the following questions: 1. Whether within reasonable medical certainty, the custody staff's use of on-stomach prone restraint and JT's vigorous resistance to it was the direct cause of JT's cardiac arrest; 2. Whether the custody staff followed Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office training policies when they employed the on-stomach prone restraint hold on JT.

Agency Responses 3

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.

No Responses Found 5

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Guadalupe City
Lompoc City
Santa Barbara City
Santa Barbara County Public Defender Elected County Office
Santa Maria City

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.