Score: +11 (11/8/0)
Contra Costa County Grand Jury • 2018-2019

Contact: Richard S. Nakano Foreperson

Published: April 18, 2019 8 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 9 findings

F1
The Office of Education’s oversight of charter school governance appears to be consistent with its oversight duties under the Education Code.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
The Board of Education has limited oversight responsibilities under the Education Code.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
The Board of Education is modifying a standardized memorandum of understanding designed by CARSNet to address issues of transparency and accountability not covered by the Education Code.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Clayton Valley has an inadequate memorandum of understanding with the Office of Education, and Making Waves - Richmond has none.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
As a condition of approving charter petitions at the next petition renewal hearing, the Office of Education should consider requiring all charter schools that are under its chartering authority to have a standardized and detailed MOU using a modified version of the CARSNet format.
F5
The Office of Education does not currently meet with charter schools as a group to facilitate best practices in governance.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The Office of Education should consider developing a plan to communicate with charter schools about how it will conduct oversight
F6
Summit, with its offices outside of Contra Costa County, and Clayton Valley, with only its Parent Faculty Club, do not promote parental engagement.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
As a condition of approving charter petitions at the next petition renewal hearing, the Office of Education should consider including provisions for parent- teacher organizations in its MOU for all charter schools.
F7
Clayton Valley has a Board of Directors structure that has too many members who have potential conflicts of interest.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
As a condition of approving Making Waves Academy and Clayton Valley Charter High School charter petitions at the next petition renewal hearing, the Office of Education should consider requiring these schools to enter into an MOU whereby they agree to update their board of director structures.
F8
Making Waves Academy has a Board of Directors structure that gives undue influence to the Making Waves Foundation to appoint the Academy Board of Directors.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
As a condition of approving Making Waves Academy and Clayton Valley Charter High School charter petitions at the next petition renewal hearing, the Office of Education should consider requiring these schools to enter into an MOU whereby they agree to update their board of director structures.
F9
The County Office of Education website provides information that is comparable to the information found on the websites of other county offices of education.
No recommendations for this finding

Agency Responses 3

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.