📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Los Angeles County Grand Jury
• 1992-1993
Investigation of Property Tax Billing
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Recommendations 3
-
R1with the practice of not undertaking projects of significant financial benefit to the County simply because they cannot pay for themselves in the year in which they are done. The Grand Jury was pleased to learn that funds for completion of Phase III have been allocated in the next fiscal year budget. The Grand Jury strongly recommends that the Board of Supervisors approve that allocation of funds. It seems appropriate to write off the 40,000 "exception" items, rather than continuing
-
R2to try to resolve them, both because the statute of limitations allows only four years to resolve and rebill them and because there is no estimate of the financial value to be derived from pursuing them any further. A single office should be designated as the lead, in coordination with other offices, in
-
R3development and implementation of computer systems and software for use by all three departments. 41