Sonoma County Grand Jury • 2017-2018 • Agency Response
Response to: Grand Jury Permit Sonoma Report

Office of the County Administrator County of Sonoma Sheryl BRATToN Coh.-Tt' ADi\flMsrR{ToR

Published: December 31, 2018 4 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 7 findings

F1 Page 2
The County Emergency Operations Center faced numerous challenges early in its set-up, affecting efficiency.
No recommendations for this finding
F2 Page 2
The emergency notification systems in use did not reach the most people in the quickest time. We disagree partially with this finding. The finding is ambiguous. The alert and warning systems in place at the time of the incident performed as designed. The relatively few number of residents subscribing to the SoCoAlert limited the number of residents contacted. As set forth in the CaIOES independent assessment, the Wireless Emergency Alert System WEA) was not used. The effectiveness of other warning systems were degraded by the loss of power, wireless data, and cell phone systems in the impacted areas. Public warning efforts were also significantly compromised by a lack of situational awareness which was almost impossible to achieve during the first critical hours of the incident. ln future events, the County will make use of the Wireless Alert System (WEA) to support emergency warning efforts for large incidents. This system was utilized on June 5, 2018 to notify residents of a dangerous industrial fire near Sonoma. At its June 11,2018 meeting, the Board of Supervisors reviewed an internal staff assessment of the county's alert and warning systems. The Board took action to develop and resource a comprehensive countywide community Alert & Warning Program. The program will have dedicated management and technical staff as well as support the use and integration of enhanced alert and warning technology and communications systems.
No recommendations for this finding
F3 Page 2
Due to demands for immediate tactical emergency response, emergency oversight and management were overwhelmed. It is critical to note that the extraordinarily rapid onset and continually evolving nature of these fires created significant challenges for first responders and support staff in the scope, speed and quantity of services required to protect life safety and property.
No recommendations for this finding
F4 Page 3
lnformation flow from County Emergency Operations Center to City Emergency Operations Centers was not adequate in meeting the needs of City Emergency Operations Centers. We disagree partially with this finding. The finding assumes that information was available but simply not communicated to the cities. The nature of the event overwhelmed established communications procedures in both volume and pace. County staff will explore the potentialfor use of automated information systems in FY201812019. This subject will also be addressed in the revision of the County Emergency Operations Plan in FY201812019. As an intermediate step, a dedicated City liaison position has been established in the County EOC organization at the senior management level. The City Liaison represents the needs and interests of senior city officials, facilitates and expedites the exchange of situation awareness information, addresses allocation of critical resources and, as needed, directly connects city leadership with senior County EOC staff.
No recommendations for this finding
F5 Page 2
Sound judgment and extraordinary efforts by individual emergency responders reduced the risk of more serious loss in Santa Rosa. We disagree wholly or partially with these finding(s):
No recommendations for this finding
F6 Page 3
The County Sheriffs Office and Santa Rosa Police Department were immersed in intense emergency actions which led to a lack of critical communication. We disagree partially with this finding. We agree that the County Sheriff's Office was immersed in intense emergency actions. Law enforcement's primary mission in the early stages of the fire was addressing immediate life safety threats and necessitated their prioritization of immediate evacuation assistance. The issue was not one of a lack of communications, but rather of accurate information to communicate given the overwhelming nature of the fires.
No recommendations for this finding
F7 Page 3
Lack of strategic communication and information on evacuation routes and shelter sites led to increased risk and confusion. We disagree wholly with this finding. The finding assumes that government agencies had good situational awareness regarding the behavior of wildfires simultaneously in multiple locations as well as the conditions of the roadways in and out of each fire location. Additionally, most shelters were established by community organizations independently of government efforts. While more timely and accurate information would have mitigated some of the confusion experienced by residents, incidents with this level of dynamic severity will continue to present communications challenges to residents and responders alike.
No recommendations for this finding