⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 8 findings
F1
The ACSD board has money set aside to work on other civil entities. the short term tasks needed, and they are actively maintaining the equipment that they have to • Research abilities, including complex reading capa- bilities, background in accessing/analyzing facts and accomplish those tasks. report writing.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The ACSD Board should meet regularly to discuss ACSD – Adin Community Service District and shape the issues facing them. BACKGROUND R2. The ACSD Board and community should be aware of the long term needs of the district, and prepare The Grand Jury received a complaint that the ACSD has for them. not been meeting very often, if at all, for months. Further- more, the complainant claimed that the creeks and ditches R3. The ACSD Board should seek alliances with the were not being maintained. Because the system is old, it resources listed in F3 to facilitate the planning will someday need major overhauls, but the Board of Di- for future upgrades. rectors is not making provision for its replacement. Reports issued by the Grand Jury do not identify individuals inter- viewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand
F2
As with every district, the infrastructure will • Substantial background in group/committee work. deteriorate. The Board needs to make plans for future replacements. • Respect and objectivity concerning the positions and views of others.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The Board needs to be sure that the administrative positions are filled with competent personnel. ADIN COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT
F3
The Grand Jury is aware of resources that are Contact the Modoc County Superior Court at available through the Department of Water 205 S. East Street, Alturas, CA 96101 Resources, the State Water Resources Control, and or call 530-233-6516 ext.1207 to learn more. Modoc County Grand Jury Report, 2015 - FINDINGS R5. The Board and administration should provide training and support for the staff members who
No recommendations for this finding
F4
No audit has been provided since FY 2011. Lack leadership of SVHCD has implemented effective of this critical information regarding the financial strategies that are leading to financial recovery. status has contributed to the current crisis. REQUEST FOR RESPONSES
Related Recommendations (2)
R3
The administration must provide accurate and June 12, 2015 timely financial documents at each regular monthly meeting. SUMMARY
R4
The Board needs to require that the CEO bring the The Adin Community Service District has an aging sewer audits up-to-date as soon as possible. system. The 2014-2015 Grand Jury recommends that they - Modoc County Grand Jury Report, 2015 DISCUSSION sufficient funds to continue at the present level. The re- sults of this analysis helped guide some changes made in The Surprise Valley Health Care District (SVHCD) pro- personnel, salaries and administration. Employees were vides a critical access hospital, a provider-based rural also asked to help with problem solving. They volunteered health clinic, a distinct-part skilled nursing facility (SNF) to take a 10% pay cut, and the Board accepted their of- and a basic life-support ambulance service to residents fer. In July 2014, the Department Heads and Management who reside in Ft. Bidwell, Lake City, Cedarville and Ea- Team recommended closing the Clinic one day a week. gleville. SVHCD is the largest employer in the valley. All parties appeared to be working toward solutions. SVHCD receives funds from a tax assessment on the resi- dents who live in its service area. To comply with federal mandates, SVHCD started using a software program that would combine all medical and During the Modoc Grand Jury investigation it quickly be- financial records. In order to save money, the economi- came apparent that there was concern throughout Surprise cal option selected, at a cost exceeding $400,000, did not Valley about the future of the District. The Grand Jury include technical support and training. When the staff learned that the lack of job training for management and encountered problems, there was no one to offer advice. the lack of training for Board members have led to a slow Switching to this program on June 1, 2014, before the end decline in employee morale and in their trust of the lead- of the fiscal year, caused additional problems. Both em- ership provided by the administration and by the Board. ployees and former Board members have mentioned the These and other factors have contributed to the current transition to this software as a major problem facing the situation. District. Mismanagement of the SVHCD has been evident for at In order to continue receiving support from MMC, the least the past five years. Not enough financial information SVHCD Board adopted a pre-employment drug screen- was presented to the Board, and audits were not kept cur- ing policy, based on MMC’s policy. The Leadership Team rent. Consequently the SVHCD Board made some unin- did not implement it because it had not been revised to formed decisions. As a result poor practices ensued, such fit SVHCD’s situation; therefore total compliance would as continued payment of insurance benefits for former em- be impossible. Furthermore, while the Board claimed to ployees, overstaffing, and employment of undocumented have adopted the policy, the current CEO points out that immigrants. Some employees felt that the Board was the minutes show no record of a vote. micro-managing and began to distrust the Board’s man- agement decisions. Many employees felt that the Board The rural health districts of the region have agreed to form wanted to “shut down” the hospital, which made for very a Joint Power Interstate Authority (JPIA). As proposed, tense situations. The Board members themselves were each district will maintain its fiscal autonomy, but share stressed. resources, such as expensive medical equipment, billing services, Information Technology services and more. This The former administrator resigned in July 2014. SVHCD’s is projected to be an effective cost saving measure for all Board requested assistance from Modoc Medical Center four districts: Mayers Memorial Hospital District of Fall (MMC). MMC agreed to allow their CAO to contract River Mills, Lake Hospital District of Lakeview, MMC with SVHCD to serve as interim CAO for three months, and SVHCD. one day per week to help with finances and administration. Many employees interpreted his presence as a way for During this Grand Jury’s tenure, the entire SVHCD Board MMC to either take over the hospital or to close it down resigned, and as of April 6, 2015, five new board members completely. have been appointed. The former Board resigned one at a time so the District could continue to function. As each SVHCD used funds from the Vesper Society to engage Board member resigned, a new member was appointed in AKT, CPAs and Business Consultants, to analyze the Dis- his/her place. As of June 1, 2015, the Board has elected trict’s organizational and financial situation. AKT found officers and has begun the task of governing the District. that SVHCD was over-staffed in some areas and lacked Modoc County Grand Jury Report, 2015 - all new employees and to all staff at least every two years. L ocaL G overnment - S v H c D REQUEST FOR RESPONSES urpriSe aLLey eaLtH are iStrict Pursuant to Penal Code section 933.05, the Grand Jury SURPRISE VALLEY HEALTH CARE requests responses as follows: June 12, 2015 From the following individuals:
F5
The cheapest option was selected when investing in the required medical software. Numerous Pursuant to Penal Code section 933.05, the Grand Jury problems have arisen that might have been requests responses as follows: avoided had the staff had training in its use and the From the following individual: availability of technical support. The CEO of SVHCD: Respond in writing to F1
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The Board of Supervisors should continue annual
F6
Minutes of the Board meetings are lacking and R1, F3 and R3, F4 and R4, F5 and R5, F6 sufficient detail to accurately record actions taken and R6, and F7 and R7. by the Board. From the following governing body:
No recommendations for this finding
F7
Parts of the pre-employment drug screening policy adopted October 30, 2014, did not fit SVHCD. SVHCD Board of Directors: F1 and R1, F2 and
No recommendations for this finding
F8
Insufficient time has passed to see if the new and R7. Board and administration will be able to institute policies that close the gap on the District’s Reports issued by the Grand Jury do not identify individuals inter- viewed. Penal Code section 929 requires that reports of the Grand indebtedness and in sure its ability to survive. Jury not contain the name of any person or facts leading to the identity of any person who provides information to the Grand Jury.
No recommendations for this finding