📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Siskiyou County Grand Jury • 2013-2014

Dunsmuir Public Utilities Practices

1 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 3 findings

F1 Page 20
The City of Dunsmuir sponsibilities and options of prop- A parcel of foreclosed commercial became apparent and threatened to being investigated by the Grand billing procedures appear to have erty owners. Put into place a property was purchased at auction. delay closing. In order to facilitate Jury. It was also clear that City staff limited ability to correctly identify, standard billing procedure with the The previous property owners owed transfer of the property the seller felt that this case could have been bill and collect for garbage, sewer purpose of assuring the new owner the City of Dunsmuir for past sewer, was forced to enter into an agree- handled much differently. The and water services with respect to receives bills in a timely manner. water and garbage services. The ment with the City of Dunsmuir Grand Jury was also assured that fil- the current property owner. Lack of complainant asserted that the city with regard to escrow closing costs. ing liens to collect sewer, water and communication with new property
F2 Page 20
The new owner was not commercial property changing own- tion. tween the beginning of foreclosure against the complainant’s property. billed for services allegedly owed. ership. proceedings and the close of escrow. During our fact-finding, it became Findings /
F3 Page 20
In this instance the City attempted to collect, through es- Those funds were ultimately recov- garbage fees is not a normal or de- owners has caused constant confu- of Dunsmuir filed an untimely lien, crow, the outstanding sewer, water ered from the City, although small sired practice. sion and expense for both the City rendering it invalid. and garbage charges owed by the claims court action was required. and new owner causing a great deal previous owners, causing costly The Grand Jury was also advised of dismay for both.

Recommendations 3