Summary of Responses to the Final Reports of the 2015-2016 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury Background | Summary of

Recommendations 18

• R1
  The Grand Jury recommends that the councils of those cities/towns that have not adopted body-worn cameras direct their respective chiefs of police to develop an appropriate body-worn camera implementation plan and advise the public of their plan
• R2
  The Grand Jury recommends that the San Mateo County Sheriff develop a plan to implement body-worn cameras and advise the public of his plan
• R3
  The Grand Jury recommends that the police departments of those cities, towns, and the Broadmoor Police Protection District that have not adopted body-worn cameras implement a body-worn camera system as soon as practicable but, in any event, no later than October 31, 2017.
• R4
  The Grand Jury recommends that the San Mateo County Sheriff's Office implement a body-worn camera system as soon as practicable but, in any event, no later than October 31, 2017. FOLLOW UP APPLICABLE RESPONDING AGENCY RESPONSE
• R5
  The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of the Bayshore Sanitary District and the City Councils of Brisbane and Daly City do the following: Improve information visibility on their website, including key system characteristics, rates and rate history, sewer system management plans, sanitary sewer overflows, and board member compensation. Key system characteristics would include population served, number of connections, number of miles of pipe (gravity, forced main), number of pump stations and number of pumps, average dry weather flow, and average wet weather flow. Ensure all information is up to date. Refresh website
• R6
  The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of the Bayshore Sanitary District and the City Councils of Brisbane and Daly City do the following: Implement and publish performance management metrics including but not limited to the Effective Utility Management framework, beginning with Fiscal Year 2016-2017.
• R7
  The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of the Bayshore Sanitary District and the City Councils of Brisbane and Daly City do the following: Adjust rates over the next five years so that all costs are recovered from ratepayers, and the reliance on property tax is eliminated. Transition property tax revenues to neighboring cities to be used for community benefit.
• R8
  The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of the Bayshore Sanitary District and the City Councils of Brisbane and Daly City do the following: Mail notices to ratepayers at least annually with an explanation of the dollar amount of sewer service charges being billed and the rationale. Provide information on the prior five years’ rates for comparison purposes. Display the portion of the rate that is related to collection activities, and the portion allocated to treatment. Mail notices approximately 30 days before the mailing of the property tax bills. Initiate mailings by November 2016. San Mateo County’s Cottage Industry Of Sanitary Districts, continued
• R9
  The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of the Bayshore Sanitary District and the City Councils of Brisbane and Daly City do the following: Notify ratepayers annually of elected nature of Board, role and compensation of Board members, and process for becoming a candidate. Encourage active participation by ratepayers. This notification may be included in the mailing that explains the rationale for rates. Initiate notification by November 2016.
• R10
  Establish term limits for the members of their boards of directors
• R11
  Establish a procurement process for professional services to include formal evaluation of existing service providers, issuance of Request for Proposals, regular reviews of existing providers, and a structured negotiation process
• R12
  Demonstrate active participation in professional organizations focused on the work of sanitary districts, such as California Water Environment Association, by June 30, 2017. Require CWEA certification of district operators, including contractors,
• R13
  Develop plans for coordinating resources in the event of a local or regional emergency by June 30, 2017. The Grand Jury recommends that the Boards of Bayshore Sanitary District, East Palo Alto Sanitary District, West Bay Sanitary District, and Westborough Water District do the following:
• R14
  Evaluate the benefit of changing the timing of board director elections to November of even years, when federal and state elections generate greater turnout. The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of the Westborough Water District do the following:
• R15
  The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of the Westborough Water District do the following: Develop, publish, and track separate budgets for sewer and water services, beginning with Fiscal Year 2016-2017. The Grand Jury recommends that the Boards of the Bayshore Sanitary District, Montara Water and Sanitary District, and Westborough Water District do the following:
• R16
  The Grand Jury recommends that the Board of the Westborough Water District do the following: Explore the feasibility of establishing a flat rate for capital improvements separate from the water usage rate. Report back at a public meeting by December 31, 2016. The Grand Jury recommends that the Boards of the Bayshore Sanitary District and East Palo Alto Sanitary District do the following:
• R17
  The Grand Jury recommends that the Boards of the Bayshore Sanitary District and East Palo Alto Sanitary District do the following: Reduce the daily compensation of board directors to $100 per day by December 31, 2017. Phase out all benefits for board directors over a period of time not to exceed three years. The Grand Jury recommends that the San Mateo County Local Agency Formation Commission do the following:
• R18
  The Grand Jury recommends that the San Mateo County Local Agency Formation Commission do the following: Initiate a service review of the Westborough Water District to examine whether its operations might be more efficiently and effectively run if they were consolidated with another entity’s operations. FOLLOW UP APPLICABLE RESPONDING AGENCY RESPONSE