Contra Costa County Grand Jury • 2014-2015

Contact: Sherry Rufini Foreperson

Published: June 08, 2015 14 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 8 findings

F1
Participation in foster care after age 18 under AB 12 is voluntary and youth may opt-out of the program before they turn 21.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Youth who opt out of foster care after age 18 can re-enter before they turn 21 if they re-enter within six months after opting out of the program.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Contra Costa County informs foster youth about AB 12 and works with governmental agencies and other organizations to offer programs and information about how the system works to this population.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
Contra Costa County Children and Family Services should continue to pro-actively inform foster care youth about AB 12’s programs.
F4
Extension of foster care to emancipated or aged out youth (ages 18-21) benefits society because foster youth receiving extended services are less likely to rely on public resources and more likely to become self-sufficient adults.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Emancipated youth who face housing instability and employment difficulties are frequently financially insecure and often have health and mental health issues.
Related Recommendations (2)
R2
Contra Costa County Children and Family Services Program should consider establishing more local housing options for aging out and emancipated youth, and identify funds to do so.
R3
Contra Costa County Children and Family Services Program should continue to provide scholarship opportunities for youth so that they can have financial support while being trained or educated.
F6
Emancipated youth often need strong supplemental supports into adulthood.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Contra Costa County Children and Family Services Program should consider establishing more local housing options for aging out and emancipated youth, and identify funds to do so.
F7
ILSP Programs help improve the lives of at-risk foster care youth by helping them secure housing, employment, educational opportunities, healthcare and community support, among other necessities.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The County should continue to support the dedicated and professional skills offered by the ILSP service providers.
F8
The County has established a database called Gold Mine to track the progress of foster youth served by the County programs.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
The County should maintain the Gold Mine database to monitor the progress and outcomes for County foster youth served by the County programs in order to help make future funding decisions about support services for foster youth.

Conclusions 2

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Elected County Office