Trinity County Grand Jury
• 2004-2005
• Agency Response
2004-2005 Trinity County Grand Jury Report
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 2 findings
F3
The Trinity County Board of Supervisors agrees, in part; with the finding. The Board will analyze if adequate policies regarding use of cell phones and vehicles do exist and if not, we will instruct the CAO and the Chief Probation Officer to create and/or update and implement these policies.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
Will be implemented, in part. I. Will be implemented. The Board will work with the CAO to insure that monthly staff meetings will be held. However, regarding specific personnel matters, we believe that it is up to the Chief Probation Officer to handle those matters in ways to protect individual employees' privacy and confidential information. 2. Needs further analysis. The Board will analyze the use of time clocks within the County, however, implementation of any new equipment and policy might require longer term financial planning and discussion with our employee union representatives.
F4
The Trinity County Board of Supervisors agrees with the finding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
Will be implemented. The Board agrees that our Probation Department should make every effort to keep parent/guardian informed regarding their child's medication and medical treatment while in the Juvenile Detention Facility, within the limits of existing laws. We thank the Grand Jury for their insight into the matters mentioned above. TO: Anthony Edwards, Superior Court Presiding Judge FROM: Terry Lee, Chief Probation Officer DATE: July 15, 2005 RE: 2004-2005 Trinity County Grand Jury Report I have reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Trinity County Grand Jury for the fiscal year 2004/2005 and make the following response to their findings and recommendations for the Probation Department.