📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Alameda County Grand Jury
• 2015-2016
Political Interference with Oakland Townhouse Project Executive Summary The Grand Jury received a complaint that an
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 5 findings
F16-1
Page 29
The councilmember had a conflict of interest with the townhouse project and interfered with the project’s approval process.
No recommendations for this finding
F16-2
Page 29
The councilmember’s use of her city staff on the townhouse project was a misuse of city resources for her personal benefit.
No recommendations for this finding
F16-3
Page 29
The councilmember privately contacted senior city staff, attempting to improperly influence decisions, which subverted the public process.
No recommendations for this finding
F16-4
Page 29
The planning director’s attempt to pacify the councilmember gave the appearance that she was collaborating with the councilmember to obstruct the property owner.
No recommendations for this finding
F16-5
Page 29
The planning director’s failure to report to the city administrator’s office or stop the councilmember’s ethical violations undermined city staff and the fair treatment of those doing business with the city.
No recommendations for this finding