📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Los Angeles County Grand Jury
• 2018-2019
The Challenge of Reporting Elder Abuse An Investigative Report into the Process of Reporting Suspected Abuse of Seniors
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 13 findings
F1
Page 80
It is difficult and confusing for the average individual to find out how to report suspected Elder Abuse because no easy-to-locate Internet source for “how to report Elder Abuse” could be located. Additionally published, printed documents are not widely distributed or available. Also, no public service advertising campaigns regarding Elder Abuse awareness came to the attention of the CGJ during the term from July 2018 to May 2019.
F2
Page 80
The term “Elder Abuse” is not a term that people are commonly aware of while “Child Abuse” and “Domestic Violence” are recognized, well known terms.
F3
Page 80
Where telephone numbers for reporting elder Abuse can be located on websites and in published documents, multiple telephone numbers relating to Elder Abuse are often provided. Encountering multiple numbers and having to determine which number to call, simply put, is unnecessarily confusing.
F4
Page 80
Information on Elder Abuse located on Internet searches24 and in County or City of Los Angeles publications is often found to be confusing. Cross referencing several sources, e.g. a website and a printed publication, is found to be confusing as multiple, alternative 24 As websites are subject to being changed, while websites were searched, referencing them will not necessarily provide the same information or layout/appearance that the CGJ encountered during its inquiries. 2018-2019 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT THE CHALLENGE OF REPORTING ELDER ABUSE 5 - 9 terms and descriptions are encountered. In particular, it is not easy to locate the correct toll free telephone number for reporting Elder Abuse on the WDACS website.25 There is an array of Elder Abuse topics posted in ‘boxes’ for reporting abuse, of which seven relate to elder abuse but only one of the seven options provides the correct number – (877) 477- 3646 – for the 24-Hour, Adult Protective Services Abuse Hotline. This number is not visible until one clicks on the appropriate option!
F5
Page 81
County websites are not always consistent and are difficult to navigate, and at least one broken link led to a “404 Web page not found” error notification on the Workforce Development, Aging & Community Services (WDACS) website26 making the County web site search to be of no help.
F6
Page 81
Clicking on the “Report Elder Abuse” button on the WDACS website27 brings up a form intended for use by trained, mandated reporters. This form is not user-friendly to the general public as only those who have received training will understand the purpose of many of the data entry fields. The form is not intuitive.
F7
Page 81
Adult Protective Services (APS) is the sole county agency that receives Elder Abuse reports.28 APS receives reports of Elder Abuse from mandated reporters and from the general public. Mandated reporters include Law Enforcement, Social Workers, Healthcare and Medical workers, Fire department employees, the Long Term Care Ombudsman and others.29
F8
Page 81
The information published on Los Angeles County websites about Adult Protective Services and how to report Elder Abuse is almost entirely oriented toward mandated reporters making the WDACS and APS websites unhelpful for the general public.
F9
Page 81
In County and City publications that we located, Elder Abuse reporting and Adult Protective Services information is just one of many topics included in the document causing Elder Abuse to lack visibility with Adult Protective Services in particular lacking visibility. The CGJ reviewed two near-identical publications that provide extensive information on services for the Elderly and for their families that are available from the Agencies on Aging for the City and County – "Elder Abuse: Prevention through Prosecution" and “Elder Justice: A Resource Guide for Action”. One of these six-page directories, shown on the next page, includes the front cover main headline, "Stop Elder Abuse". 25 https://wdacs.lacounty.gov/programs/aps/whenwhere-to-report-abuse/ 26 https://www.lacounty.gov/report/ the link posted as “I want to report… Elder Abuse (Adult Protective Services)” - verified 5-3-2019. 27 https://wdacs.lacounty.gov/ 28 https://wdacs.lacounty.gov/programs/aps/ 29 “Information For Mandated Reporters”, http://www.cdss.ca.gov/inforesources/Adult-Protective-Services 2018-2019 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT THE CHALLENGE OF REPORTING ELDER ABUSE 5 - 10 The following two graphics show the inside page which provides the following information about ‘who to call’ from each of these two brochures: • Dial 911 to report elder abuse or neglect to the Police NOW if the abuse is immediate and life-threatening. • Elder Abuse Hotline at 1-877-477-3646 or 1-800-992-1660 to report allegations of abuse when you are unsure on where to call. • Adult Protective Services, County of Los Angeles, 1-888-202-4248 if you suspect elder abuse in the community. Call 213-351-5401 if you are outside of Los Angeles County. • Long-Term Care Ombudsman, at WISE & Healthy Aging 1-800-334-9473 and report suspected abuse occurring at board and care homes, nursing homes and assisted living facilities in LA County. • Statewide Ombudsman after-hours crisis line: 1-800-231-4024. * The entry referencing ‘Dial 911’ included above does not appear in the on-line version shown on this page but is included in hard copy versions of the brochure. 2018-2019 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT THE CHALLENGE OF REPORTING ELDER ABUSE 5 - 11 2018-2019 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT THE CHALLENGE OF REPORTING ELDER ABUSE 5 - 12
F10
Page 84
The information line referencing Adult Protective Services in both documents providing multiple telephone numbers is confusing; the 1-877-477-3646 number alone is adequate.
F11
Page 84
These excellent documents provide helpful information about the various types of Elder Abuse. However, both have been distributed on a very limited basis because of printing costs, the expenses of mailing and, the CGJ was advised, a limited budget.
F12
Page 84
Although it is not at all easy to find them unless one has the URL, on-line versions of these two documents exist and can be located online at: http://assets.lapdonline.org/assets/pdf/Elder_Abuse_BRO_for_Law_Enforcement_6-5-15.pdf and http://www.wiseandhealthyaging.org/cms/pdf/Elder%20Justice%20Resource%20Guide%202018% 20web.pdf. 2018-2019 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT THE CHALLENGE OF REPORTING ELDER ABUSE 5 - 13
F13
Page 85
The statistical information provided by APS showed the number of reported incidents of Elder Abuse that warranted an investigation. The number of reported incidents of Elder Abuse that warranted an investigation rose from 41,220 in 2014-2015 to 56,065 in 2017- 2018, a growth of 38.3% over a 4 year period. During this time period APS staffing increased minimally. The average number of new cases per social worker per year has risen from 317 in 2014-15 to 356 in 2017-18. As stated in the earlier section on ‘Suspected Elder Abuse Calls Reported’ (on -8), the average number of new cases per social worker per year has risen by 12%.
Recommendations 27
-
R1Page 75Adult Protective Services
-
R2Page 87City of Los Angeles, Department of Aging
-
R3Page 75Los Angeles County Area Agency on Aging
-
R4Page 75Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office, Bureau of Victim Services
-
R5Page 75Los Angeles Police Department, Communications Division, Operations Support Unit
-
R6Page 75Long Term Care Ombudsman Program
-
R7Page 75Workforce Development, Aging & Community Services COMMITTEE MEMBERS Ronald A. Evans, Co-Chair Judith E. Halloran, Co-Chair Nancy Coleman Eslie James Patricia G. Patrick 2018-2019 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT THE CHALLENGE OF REPORTING ELDER ABUSE 5 - 16 DRUGS IN JAILS THE PERPETUAL SCOURGE Michael Rodrigues, Chair Valencia R. Shelton, Co-Chair Renée Jenkins, Secretary Hector R. Gonzalez* Freida K. King DRUGS IN JAILS The Perpetual Scourge SUMMARY A record number of state prisoners have lost their lives due to accidental drug overdoses - at least 150 in California prisons since 2006.1 These individuals died in custody, while under the care and supervision of prison staff, simply because illicit drugs continue to be smuggled undetected into detention facilities. In a technologically advanced civilized society, there may be alternative methods available to combat this scourge. Despite the reasons behind the incarceration of these individuals, they are still fellow human beings and should be treated as such. The 2018-2019 Los Angeles County Civil Grand Jury (CGJ) sought to evaluate all current drug screening practices so that it could identify where the current efforts are falling short of their purported desired outcomes and in many instances failing altogether. In doing so, the CGJ hopes to ascertain and recommend reasonable as well as effective measures that will help to prevent illegal drugs from continuing to enter detention facilities undetected. The CGJ reviewed many documented drug smuggling cases which exposed the unfortunate truth that potential offenders extend beyond inmates, trustees, and visiting family and friends. Also included are vendors and employees who provide laundry, mailroom, and food service. Other often overlooked individuals include detention officers, attorneys, and medical personnel who are all allowed unsupervised contact with the inmates. With the wide variety of potential offenders and the unrestricted opportunities for some to smuggle drugs into detention facilities, it is nearly impossible to prevent illegal drugs from entering these institutions.
-
R8Page 104conference room area is not large enough to accommodate 23 people
-
R9Page 104inadequate rooms or spaces in which the CGJ’s various committees can meet and confer
-
R10Page 104lack of privacy needed to make phone calls, interview witnesses, or meet in groups
-
R11Page 104restrooms are not sufficient or adequate
-
R12Page 104current break area is unacceptable for grand jurors 1 http://worldpopulationreview.com/us-counties/ (accessed 05-07-19) 2 California Penal Code section 908.1 3 https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/synergy (accessed 04-25-19) 2018-2019 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT GRAND JURY FACILITIES AND RETENTION 7 - 1
-
R13Page 105inadequate locker space for personal storage during the work day
-
R14lack acceptable temperature control. Other issues hindered the 2018-2019 CGJ’s ability to conduct its investigations. For example:
-
R15Page 105the CGJ has not been provided adequate training in conducting investigations, report writing, or County Counsel’s expectations.
-
R16Page 105the Information Technology provided is inadequate for collaborative investigations as the CGJ cannot receive electronic files (i.e. from witnesses, agencies, businesses, or other organizations) greater than file sizes limited by the court’s email system.
-
R17Page 105inadequate transportation for the CGJ’s needs.
-
R18Page 104conference room area is not large enough to accommodate 23 people
-
R19Page 104inadequate rooms or spaces in which the CGJ’s various committees can meet and confer
-
R20Page 104lack of privacy needed to make phone calls, interview witnesses, or meet in groups
-
R21Page 104restrooms are not sufficient or adequate
-
R22Page 104current break area is unacceptable for grand jurors 1 http://worldpopulationreview.com/us-counties/ (accessed 05-07-19) 2 California Penal Code section 908.1 3 https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/synergy (accessed 04-25-19) 2018-2019 LOS ANGELES COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY FINAL REPORT GRAND JURY FACILITIES AND RETENTION 7 - 1
-
R23Page 105inadequate locker space for personal storage during the work day
-
R24lack acceptable temperature control. Other issues hindered the 2018-2019 CGJ’s ability to conduct its investigations. For example:
-
R25Page 105the CGJ has not been provided adequate training in conducting investigations, report writing, or County Counsel’s expectations.
-
R26Page 105the Information Technology provided is inadequate for collaborative investigations as the CGJ cannot receive electronic files (i.e. from witnesses, agencies, businesses, or other organizations) greater than file sizes limited by the court’s email system.
-
R27Page 105inadequate transportation for the CGJ’s needs.