📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 6 findings
F1
Page 63
Fleet Services is an efficient and competent resource for the County.
F2
Page 63
Fleet Services currently has no means of enforcing its suggestions made to other departments.
F3
Page 63
There currently is no single department with authority over all of the County vehicles.
F4
Page 63
County procedures manuals provide no clear criteria for when a vehicle should be classified as “Surplus” or retired.
F5
Page 63
There is no mechanism for adequate centralized record keeping for County vehicles.
F6
Page 63
There is no procedure outlining the transfer of vehicles between departments.
Recommendations 3
-
R1Page 63Develop a plan for more effective management of the County‟s vehicles, which includes an explicit evaluation of consolidation and/or centralization of this function under the authority of a single department. The plan should address allocation, maintenance, retirement, and replacement of County vehicles. Provide a deadline for implementation of this plan.
-
R2Page 63Amend the appropriate policy or procedure manual to provide clear criteria dictating when a vehicle should be designated “Surplus” or retired.
-
R3Page 63Amend the appropriate policy or procedure manual to provide an efficient means of transferring a vehicle between departments. 39