Stanislaus County Grand Jury • 2013-2014

2013-2014 Final Report*

Published: June 27, 2014 56 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 11 findings

F1
account. Regarding the issue of overpayment, the US Department of Housing and Urban Development has a cap on how much a Director can make. The Director's salary is below that cap. The Director is in charge of seven other counties, as well. This complaint was found to be unsubstantiated.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The Complainant and other residents served by this irrigation pipeline were strongly encouraged to consider the options presented and discussed at the OID Water Commission meetings.
F2
Although the union did not have a contract, they were given a 2 % pay increase, which was half a percent less than they had been seeking. The pay increases that managers received were due to an added work load after a fourth manager left and that position wasn't filled. The three remaining managers were given additional duties to make up for the loss of the fourth manager. This complaint was found to be unsubstantiated.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
OID staff, the Complainant and other residents involved were encouraged to meet together to discuss which option would specifically provide a minimum of property damage, yet also provide a permanent solution to the leaking irrigation pipeline, in a cost effective manner.
F3
The HA's Attorney negotiated on behalf of the HA with regards to the Director's employment contract. The attorney represented the HA, not the Director. This complaint was found to be unsubstantiated.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
OID staff needed to provide all residents involved with a written timeline for the repair to occur, once funding became available. RESPONSES The responses and actions taken by OID were:
F4
The trips and events in question are training conventions that various HA sanctioned associations host for the national housing authorities. The conventions are designed to give commissioners and directors useful information that should be taken back to the local HA divisions. This complaint was found to be unsubstantiated. Evidence supports that the HA did in fact violate the Brown Act. At a rescheduled
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The county should set up a replacement/capital outlay fund for the purchase of all county vehicles. RESPONSES The summarized responses from the SCBOS/GSA were:
F5
meeting, this SCCGJ committee witnessed firsthand the HA's process for such an event. The HA had posted the notice to reschedule the public meeting on their website and inside the lobby of the HA building. This posting was not visible to those arriving to the meeting, which was scheduled for after business hours. 2013-2014 Stanislaus County CGJ Final Report
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
Adhere to the proposed June 2013 closure of the Honor Farm, if possible.
F6
The use of temporary employees is governed by the US Department of HUD and the union contracts in place at the HA. Although the HA does use temporary employees to its advantage, there was no evidence that the HA had violated any laws. This complaint was found to be unsubstantiated.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
With regards to the Men's Jail, accelerate any proposed renovations or planned new construction for a combined jail/courthouse facility. RESPONSES The summarized responses from the Stanislaus County Sheriff/SCBOS were:
F7
It was confirmed through several sources and the Director that there was a manager who did bring a pet to work.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
The HA should change its policy to not allow pets in the HA building.
F8
The HA has now assigned a manager to make the deposits. Both the Director and the Finance Manager made the change as a result of safety concerns.
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
None Probation Department/Juvenile Institutions
F9
Although the HA building was secure and employee files were locked each night, the client files were not. Anyone with access into the building could steal personal information found in the files. File storage rooms also did not have a keyed lock for access.
Related Recommendations (1)
R9
The HA should change its policy about the handling of clients' personal information to include the requirement that clients' files be kept in a locked vault or locked filing cabinets at all times. Request for Response from: The HA Director The HA Commissioners Part 4: Case 14-04C: Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department 2013-2014 Stanislaus Civil Grand Jury Case #14-04C Policy and Compliance Report on the Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department Helicopter COMPLAINT This complaint was generated through three separate sources. First, a citizen's complaint was referred from the 2012-2013 Stanislaus County Civil Grand Jury (SCCGJ) concerning use of the Sheriff's helicopter. Second, several articles appeared in the local newspaper raising reasonable concerns about the correct use of County vehicles operated by the Sheriff's Department. Third, the complainant filed an addendum complaint questioning the use of the Sheriff's helicopter as a silent auction item for the local Hospice organization.
F10
The facility is clean and well maintained, and staffed with personnel who are highly motivated to help juvenile inmates. The SCCGJ was very impressed with the current staff.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
Current vocational programs are outstanding and very educational.
No recommendations for this finding

Additional Recommendations 1

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.