Score: -2
(8/7/10)
Orange County Grand Jury
• 2023-2024
• Agency Response
Laguna Beach*
Published: August 30, 2024
3 pages
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 3 findings
F1
Orange County's K-12 public schools have implemented policies and/or guidelines around the use of different AI platforms in varying and inconsistent ways. Some prohibit AI's use; others allow it: and some don't have policies or guidelines governing AI at all. The District cannot comment on other districts' policies and/or guidelines around the use of AI platforms. As it pertains to LBUSD, we deployed AI to our teachers using products that comply with state and federal guidelines for safety. LBUSD has policies that are being that are in the approval process about AI. LBUSD has several Board Policies that reference AI that have been drafted and are going to be reviewed. Board Policy 5131.9 - Academic Honesty Board Policy 6154 - Homework/Makeup Work Board Policy 6162.5 - Student Assessment Board Policy 6163.4 - Student Use of Technology will go for a first reading on September 12, 2024 550 Blumont Street, Laguna Beach, CA 92651 10,00 4
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
By June 30, 2025 Orange County's K-12 schools should implement policies and guidelines regarding the appropriate use of AI. These may be provided at the district level or within individual schools through the adoption of an Acceptable Use Policy, Code of Ethics, or other written directives addressing the use of AI. The District is working on implementing this recommendation and will meet the recommended timeline proposed by the Grand Jury.
F2
Superintendents provide varying levels of support in implementing AI policies and/or guidelines in their respective school districts. The District partially disagrees in that it cannot comment on the superintendent's level of support in implementing AI policies and/or guidelines in other districts. As it pertains to LBUSD, the Superintendent has recommended and approved training, policies, and guidelines. These trainings include AI for staff efficiency, during class usage as a learning tool, and students using AI.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
Superintendents should ensure that their schools have policies that cover, at a minimum: the scope, guiding principles, and training regarding the responsible use of AI tools by students and teachers; any prohibited uses of special considerations regarding AI tools; and related security, privacy, and safety considerations. The recommendation has not yet fully been implemented but will be implemented in the future.
F3
There are many resources to guide educators in using AI. Several Are available at the local level through the Orange County Department of Education, Orange County Board of Education, CEO Leadership Alliance Orange County, and Orange Unified School District Technology Department, to name a few. However, utilization and even awareness of the availability of such resources is highly variable across school districts. The District partially disagrees with the finding. The District does not have firsthand information regarding the utilization and awareness of the availability of the AI resources across school districts. As it pertains to LBUSD, we are aware of these resources and participate in them as time permits.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
K-12 students should be trained on the appropriate use of AI. LBUSD has purchased several systems that are approved with the Student Data Privacy agreement that have teacher monitored access to AI tools. As students use these services the teacher will guide them on appropriate usage as well as monitor their use of the AI tool. LBUSD is in the process of building a citation tool for AI usage so there is transparency between teachers and students.
Agency Responses 6
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.
▶
Laguna Beach Unified School District
July 12, 2017
•
2 pages
• 5 responses
•
Score: +3
(+3, 0, 0)
View Details ▾
5 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Orange County's K-12 public schools have implemented policies and/or guidelines around the use of different AI platforms in varying and inconsistent ways. Some prohibit AI's use; others allow it: and some don't have policies or guidelines governing AI at all. The District cannot comment on other districts' policies and/or guidelines around the use of AI platforms. As it pertains to LBUSD, we deployed AI to our teachers using products that comply with state and federal guidelines for safety. LBUS...
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Laguna Beach Unified School District agrees with this finding. The Laguna Beach Unified School District was aware of the impact of SB 277 before it took effect and trained its staff in preparation for the implementation of SB 277. Finding 2: There were very few problems that arose with medical exemptions for vaccinations. Health clerks and school nurses were able to handle any discrepancies.
R1
By June 30, 2025 Orange County's K-12 schools should implement policies and guidelines regarding the appropriate use of AI. These may be provided at the district level or within individual schools through the adoption of an Acceptable Use Policy, Code of Ethics, or other written directives addressing the use of AI. The District is working on implementing this recommendation and will meet the recommended timeline proposed by the Grand Jury.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The Laguna Beach Unified School District has implemented this recommendation. The Laguna Beach Unified School District will continue to track students with grandfathered personal belief exemptions to ensure these students have the required vaccinations before they reach the next reporting levels. The Laguna Beach Unified School District has systems in place to track these students. Recommendation 2: Districts should continue to monitor student vaccination percentages to maintain the threshold defined by the CDPH (California Department of Public Health).
F2
Superintendents provide varying levels of support in implementing AI policies and/or guidelines in their respective school districts. The District partially disagrees in that it cannot comment on the superintendent's level of support in implementing AI policies and/or guidelines in other districts. As it pertains to LBUSD, the Superintendent has recommended and approved training, policies, and guidelines. These trainings include AI for staff efficiency, during class usage as a learning tool, and...
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Laguna Beach Unified School District agrees with this finding. The District school nurse reported very few problems with medical exemptions for vaccinations. Each health clerk at each school site and the District school nurse were able to handle any discrepancies. Compliance has not been problematic at any school site due to the District's clear communication via individualized telephone calls, website information, email, mailed letters, verbal face-to-face communication, and education at time of school registration. Finding 3: Personal belief exemptions that were grandfathered in are prof...
R2
Superintendents should ensure that their schools have policies that cover, at a minimum: the scope, guiding principles, and training regarding the responsible use of AI tools by students and teachers; any prohibited uses of special considerations regarding AI tools; and related security, privacy, and safety considerations. The recommendation has not yet fully been implemented but will be implemented in the future.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The Laguna Beach Unified School District has implemented this recommendation. The Laguna Beach Unified School District will continue to monitor student vaccination percentages to make every attempt to maintain the threshold defined by the California Department of Public Health. Sincerely, Jason Viloria, Ed.D. District Superintendent
F3
There are many resources to guide educators in using AI. Several Are available at the local level through the Orange County Department of Education, Orange County Board of Education, CEO Leadership Alliance Orange County, and Orange Unified School District Technology Department, to name a few. However, utilization and even awareness of the availability of such resources is highly variable across school districts. The District partially disagrees with the finding. The District does not have first...
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The Laguna Beach Unified School District agrees with this finding. Prior to the first day of school, lists are made at each of the school sites by the health clerks. These lists include the name of the student, vaccinations not yet received and dates that missing doses are due. Each month, the list is evaluated by the District school nurse and parents are notified by telephone and email of upcoming due dates. Finding 4: Orange County school districts made every effort to make vaccination information available using social media, direct mailings, and links on school websites to clinics in the a...
▶
Laguna Beach Unified School District
September 23, 2016
•
10 pages
• 4 responses
•
Score: -2
(+1, 0, -3)
View Details ▾
4 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Orange County's K-12 public schools have implemented policies and/or guidelines around the use of different AI platforms in varying and inconsistent ways. Some prohibit AI's use; others allow it: and some don't have policies or guidelines governing AI at all. The District cannot comment on other districts' policies and/or guidelines around the use of AI platforms. As it pertains to LBUSD, we deployed AI to our teachers using products that comply with state and federal guidelines for safety. LBUS...
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The District agrees with this finding only as it relates to the District. Over the years, the District has maintained AHERA reports relating to the condition and removal of asbestos at its Facilities, Maintenance & Operations office and at individual school sites. F2. Although current EPA standards provide that encapsulated asbestos does not present an immediate hazard to people who come near it, any physical disturbance and/or weathering which damages that encapsulation and releases asbestos fibers into the air will present an immediate hazard to anyone exposed to those fibers. Hence, broad-b...
R1
By June 30, 2025 Orange County's K-12 schools should implement policies and guidelines regarding the appropriate use of AI. These may be provided at the district level or within individual schools through the adoption of an Acceptable Use Policy, Code of Ethics, or other written directives addressing the use of AI. The District is working on implementing this recommendation and will meet the recommended timeline proposed by the Grand Jury.
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
The District agrees with this finding only as it relates to the District. Over the years, the District has maintained AHERA reports relating to the condition and removal of asbestos at its Facilities, Maintenance & Operations office and at individual school sites. F2. Although current EPA standards provide that encapsulated asbestos does not present an immediate hazard to people who come near it, any physical disturbance and/or weathering which damages that encapsulation and releases asbestos fibers into the air will present an immediate hazard to anyone exposed to those fibers. Hence, broad-b...
F2
Superintendents provide varying levels of support in implementing AI policies and/or guidelines in their respective school districts. The District partially disagrees in that it cannot comment on the superintendent's level of support in implementing AI policies and/or guidelines in other districts. As it pertains to LBUSD, the Superintendent has recommended and approved training, policies, and guidelines. These trainings include AI for staff efficiency, during class usage as a learning tool, and...
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
The District disagrees wholly with this finding. Pursuant to AHERA regulations, the District is required to maintain records of where encapsulated asbestos is located. As required by law, these records are available for public review at the District's Facilities, Maintenance & Operations office and at individual school sites. The District's facilities, maintenance and construction personnel are familiar with the contents of the AHERA reports and the location of where encapsulated asbestos is located. F3. Many school districts are not in full compliance with the AHERA regulatory requirement to ...
F3
There are many resources to guide educators in using AI. Several Are available at the local level through the Orange County Department of Education, Orange County Board of Education, CEO Leadership Alliance Orange County, and Orange Unified School District Technology Department, to name a few. However, utilization and even awareness of the availability of such resources is highly variable across school districts. The District partially disagrees with the finding. The District does not have first...
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
The District disagrees wholly with this finding only as it relates to the District. The District is not in a position to comment on the availability of applicable AHERA reports at other school districts within Orange County. The District is in compliance with AHERA requirements and provides copies of AHERA reports for public review at its Facilities, Maintenance & Operations office, at individual school sites as well as online (See: http://www.lbusd.org located under the facilities department). F4. Many school districts are not in full compliance with the AHERA regulatory requirement to identi...
▶
Laguna Beach Unified School District
September 10, 2015
•
2 pages
• 5 responses
•
Score: -4
(+0, 1, -4)
View Details ▾
5 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Orange County's K-12 public schools have implemented policies and/or guidelines around the use of different AI platforms in varying and inconsistent ways. Some prohibit AI's use; others allow it: and some don't have policies or guidelines governing AI at all. The District cannot comment on other districts' policies and/or guidelines around the use of AI platforms. As it pertains to LBUSD, we deployed AI to our teachers using products that comply with state and federal guidelines for safety. LBUS...
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
The Laguna Beach Unified School District disagrees completely with this Finding. All of the information related to CFDs is accessible on the school district's website. Finding 2: There does not seem to be appropriate oversight and auditing of CFDs and special tax expenditures within the County of Orange.
R1
By June 30, 2025 Orange County's K-12 schools should implement policies and guidelines regarding the appropriate use of AI. These may be provided at the district level or within individual schools through the adoption of an Acceptable Use Policy, Code of Ethics, or other written directives addressing the use of AI. The District is working on implementing this recommendation and will meet the recommended timeline proposed by the Grand Jury.
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
The Laguna Beach Unified School District sees no need to create an oversight committee or an audit committee. The Laguna Beach Unified School District has a district website that contains all of the information the taxpayers need regarding the CFD. By entering their address or assessor parcel number, property owners can see all the information related to the Mello-Roos tax and access all district reports with respect to the CFD. The Board of Educators provides sufficient oversight and reviews all the reports. Therefore, the recommendation will not be implemented.
Recommendation 2:
Audit repo...
F2
Superintendents provide varying levels of support in implementing AI policies and/or guidelines in their respective school districts. The District partially disagrees in that it cannot comment on the superintendent's level of support in implementing AI policies and/or guidelines in other districts. As it pertains to LBUSD, the Superintendent has recommended and approved training, policies, and guidelines. These trainings include AI for staff efficiency, during class usage as a learning tool, and...
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
The Laguna Beach Unified School District disagrees completely with this Finding. The Laguna Beach Unified School District believes there is sufficient oversight and auditing of its CFDs.
Finding 3: While the assumption is that the CFD debt would be repaid in a finite period of time, there is a mechanism available to controlling entities to extend debt obligations and thereby extend the CFD special tax in perpetuity.
R2
Superintendents should ensure that their schools have policies that cover, at a minimum: the scope, guiding principles, and training regarding the responsible use of AI tools by students and teachers; any prohibited uses of special considerations regarding AI tools; and related security, privacy, and safety considerations. The recommendation has not yet fully been implemented but will be implemented in the future.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
All information is available on the Laguna Beach Unified School District website. Taxpayers may access this information on the Laguna Beach Unified School District's website. Therefore, this recommendation has been implemented. If you have any further questions or need additional information, please contact Dean West at (949) 497-7700 ext. 5212. Sincerely, Den Wo Dean West Assistant Superintendent, Business Services Laguna Beach Unified School District
F3
There are many resources to guide educators in using AI. Several Are available at the local level through the Orange County Department of Education, Orange County Board of Education, CEO Leadership Alliance Orange County, and Orange Unified School District Technology Department, to name a few. However, utilization and even awareness of the availability of such resources is highly variable across school districts. The District partially disagrees with the finding. The District does not have first...
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
The Laguna Beach Unified School District disagrees completely with this Finding. The Laguna Beach Unified School District has not extended the time for repayment nor do the legal documents establishing the school district's CFD allow unlimited extensions of time for repayment. The Laguna Beach Unified School District does not intend to acquire additional funds under its CFD. Recommendation 1: Each local agency that established the CFD should create an oversight committee and an audit committee to provide for an independent, transparent view of the manner in which CFD funds are being expended.
▶
Laguna Beach Unified School District
September 08, 2014
•
1 pages
• 1 response
View Details ▾
1 response to findings and recommendations
R1
By June 30, 2025 Orange County's K-12 schools should implement policies and guidelines regarding the appropriate use of AI. These may be provided at the district level or within individual schools through the adoption of an Acceptable Use Policy, Code of Ethics, or other written directives addressing the use of AI. The District is working on implementing this recommendation and will meet the recommended timeline proposed by the Grand Jury.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
</b> The Laguna Beach Unified School District partially disagrees with this recommendation. The Laguna Beach Unified School District agrees that a clear explanation of the assumed future growth rate of assessed values in the bond election materials made available to voters is a good recommendation for school districts. The Laguna Beach Unified School District also agrees that the explanation should reference relevant historical assessed value data for the individual district. However, the Laguna Beach Unified School District cannot determine if there is a factual basis for the remainder of the...
▶
Laguna Beach Unified School District
July 27, 2012
•
4 pages
• 6 responses
•
Score: -2
(+1, 1, -3)
View Details ▾
6 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Orange County's K-12 public schools have implemented policies and/or guidelines around the use of different AI platforms in varying and inconsistent ways. Some prohibit AI's use; others allow it: and some don't have policies or guidelines governing AI at all. The District cannot comment on other districts' policies and/or guidelines around the use of AI platforms. As it pertains to LBUSD, we deployed AI to our teachers using products that comply with state and federal guidelines for safety. LBUS...
Response: Disagree Partially
Score: 0
The District agrees partially with this finding. The District agrees that not all Orange County schools use the same technology and procedures to record bullying or harassment incidents. Different districts use different databases and internal procedures to track bullying complaints. With regard to the codes used to record bullying or harassment incidents, prior to July 1, 2012, Education Code section 48900(r) defined bullying by reference to sexual harassment (Education Code section 48900.2), hate violence (Education Code section 48900.3), and harassment, threats and intimidation (Education C...
R1
By June 30, 2025 Orange County's K-12 schools should implement policies and guidelines regarding the appropriate use of AI. These may be provided at the district level or within individual schools through the adoption of an Acceptable Use Policy, Code of Ethics, or other written directives addressing the use of AI. The District is working on implementing this recommendation and will meet the recommended timeline proposed by the Grand Jury.
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
This recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted and is not reasonable. The District tracks incidents of bullying as follows: As part of the District's Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support approach, the schools of the District maintain a data base of student behaviors, including bullying, using the School Wide Information System as well as Aeries. The data are reviewed regularly at each school site. Different districts use different technology and procedures that reflect the unique needs of each district. While all districts will comply with State-mandated repor...
F2
Superintendents provide varying levels of support in implementing AI policies and/or guidelines in their respective school districts. The District partially disagrees in that it cannot comment on the superintendent's level of support in implementing AI policies and/or guidelines in other districts. As it pertains to LBUSD, the Superintendent has recommended and approved training, policies, and guidelines. These trainings include AI for staff efficiency, during class usage as a learning tool, and...
Response: Agree
Score: +1
The District agrees that AB 1156 provides a broader definition of "bullying" than was contained in prior law. <sup>1</sup> The Orange County Superintendent of Schools has been directed to respond to Recommendations 4 and 5.
Finding 3: Education Code section 234.1 requiring posting of anti-bullying/antiharassment policies in prescribed areas was not evident in all schools visited.
R2
Superintendents should ensure that their schools have policies that cover, at a minimum: the scope, guiding principles, and training regarding the responsible use of AI tools by students and teachers; any prohibited uses of special considerations regarding AI tools; and related security, privacy, and safety considerations. The recommendation has not yet fully been implemented but will be implemented in the future.
Response: Will Not Implement
Score: -1
The District will not implement this policy because it is not warranted and is not reasonable. The District has no legal authority to obligate other school districts. However, it should be noted that the District is required by law to apply the <sup>2</sup> Educ. Code § 234.1(d).
1 definition of "bullying" contained in Education Code section 48900(r) in suspending and expelling students. The District also intends to use this definition of "bullying" in tracking complaints of bullying that are sustained. Recommendation 3: Each district review standardized procedures to protect a bully victim a...
F3
There are many resources to guide educators in using AI. Several Are available at the local level through the Orange County Department of Education, Orange County Board of Education, CEO Leadership Alliance Orange County, and Orange Unified School District Technology Department, to name a few. However, utilization and even awareness of the availability of such resources is highly variable across school districts. The District partially disagrees with the finding. The District does not have first...
Response: Disagree
Score: -1
The District cannot comment on what policies are posted in all schools throughout Orange County, but can respond only on behalf of the District itself. Finding 3 combines the requirement to post anti-discrimination/anti-harassment policies in prescribed areas with the requirement to post anti-bullying policies. The requirement for school districts to post their anti-bullying policy in all schools and offices, including staff lounges and pupil government meeting rooms, is new as of July 1, 2012.<sup>2</sup> Thus, the District disagrees with Finding 3 to the extent it reflects on the District's ...
R3
K-12 students should be trained on the appropriate use of AI. LBUSD has purchased several systems that are approved with the Student Data Privacy agreement that have teacher monitored access to AI tools. As students use these services the teacher will guide them on appropriate usage as well as monitor their use of the AI tool. LBUSD is in the process of building a citation tool for AI usage so there is transparency between teachers and students.
Response: Unknown
Score: 0
The District has substantially completed this recommendation through adoption and dissemination of Anti-Bullying Board Policy 5044 on April 24, 2012, which addresses confidentiality protections as required by Education Code section 234.1. The District has adopted Uniform Complaint Board Policy 6009, which also addresses issues of retaliation and confidentiality. Those policies state: Board Policy 5044 Section VIII. Confidentiality: The identity of a complainant alleging discrimination, harassment, intimidation, or bullying shall remain confidential as appropriate within the dual contexts of th...
▶
LAGUNA BEACH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
August 03, 2018
•
7 pages
• 8 responses
•
Score: +3
(+3, 5, 0)
View Details ▾
8 responses to findings and recommendations
F1
Orange County's K-12 public schools have implemented policies and/or guidelines around the use of different AI platforms in varying and inconsistent ways. Some prohibit AI's use; others allow it: and some don't have policies or guidelines governing AI at all. The District cannot comment on other districts' policies and/or guidelines around the use of AI platforms. As it pertains to LBUSD, we deployed AI to our teachers using products that comply with state and federal guidelines for safety. LBUS...
Response: Agree
Score: +1
: The Laguna Beach Unified School District agrees with this finding. School safety and security are a priority in Laguna Beach Unified School District. F.2. The implementation of security measures for schools, in many cases, is limited by funding.
R1
By June 30, 2025 Orange County's K-12 schools should implement policies and guidelines regarding the appropriate use of AI. These may be provided at the district level or within individual schools through the adoption of an Acceptable Use Policy, Code of Ethics, or other written directives addressing the use of AI. The District is working on implementing this recommendation and will meet the recommended timeline proposed by the Grand Jury.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
: The recommendation has been implemented. Recommendations from evaluations by the local police department and school site administrators are included in the annual updates to the Facilities Master Plan. The recommended operational and facility improvements are funded by allocating a portion of the general fund budget to finance identified safety and security enhancements. The District is committed to continued exploration of potential funding of future security and safety measures. R.2.: School districts should re-evaluate the lack of secure fencing on all school campuses and present a report...
F2
Superintendents provide varying levels of support in implementing AI policies and/or guidelines in their respective school districts. The District partially disagrees in that it cannot comment on the superintendent's level of support in implementing AI policies and/or guidelines in other districts. As it pertains to LBUSD, the Superintendent has recommended and approved training, policies, and guidelines. These trainings include AI for staff efficiency, during class usage as a learning tool, and...
Response: Agree
Score: +1
: The Laguna Beach Unified School District agrees with this finding. The extent to which our schools can implement the type and extent of security measures is often dependent on funding. <math>\otimes</math>
F.3. Many Orange County school campuses were constructed to reflect an "open and inviting" atmosphere but are now faced with physical and philosophical security issues that challenge this thinking.
R2
Superintendents should ensure that their schools have policies that cover, at a minimum: the scope, guiding principles, and training regarding the responsible use of AI tools by students and teachers; any prohibited uses of special considerations regarding AI tools; and related security, privacy, and safety considerations. The recommendation has not yet fully been implemented but will be implemented in the future.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
: The recommendation has been implemented. The assessment of each school campus is performed an annual basis with local authorities and school site personnel. The identified fencing improvement measures are included within the annual Facilities Master Plan that is approved by the Board of Education. The assessment reports, once completed, are reviewed by the District Safety Committee and provided to the Board of Education for their consideration and direction to staff. R.3.: School districts should implement procedures to ensure that all campuses maintain a complete, daily log (electronic or m...
F3
There are many resources to guide educators in using AI. Several Are available at the local level through the Orange County Department of Education, Orange County Board of Education, CEO Leadership Alliance Orange County, and Orange Unified School District Technology Department, to name a few. However, utilization and even awareness of the availability of such resources is highly variable across school districts. The District partially disagrees with the finding. The District does not have first...
Response: Agree
Score: +1
: The Laguna Beach Unified School District agrees with this finding. Of the four schools within our district, the one elementary school and one middle school can be considered to reflect an "open and inviting" atmosphere. One elementary school and the high school are considered to be a closed campus by means of fencing and building structures. F.4. While every Orange County school district reported the use of a campus visitor sign-in process, there is a lack of procedural consistency among school campuses.
R3
K-12 students should be trained on the appropriate use of AI. LBUSD has purchased several systems that are approved with the Student Data Privacy agreement that have teacher monitored access to AI tools. As students use these services the teacher will guide them on appropriate usage as well as monitor their use of the AI tool. LBUSD is in the process of building a citation tool for AI usage so there is transparency between teachers and students.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
: The recommendation has been implemented, the District implemented the Raptor Technologies school check-in system at the start of the 2017-2018 school year in September 2017. The check-in system maintains a complete electronic log of every visitor and volunteer entering and exiting the campus. R.4.: School districts should implement procedures to ensure that photo identification is required of all campus visitors and volunteers before a visitor's badge is issued. (F.4, F.5.)
R4
K-12 teachers should be trained on the appropriate use of AI. The recommendation has been implemented.
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
: The recommendation has been implemented, the District implemented the Raptor Technologies school check-in system at the start of the 2017-2018 school year in September 2017. The school campuses require all visitors and volunteers to check-in using a valid driver's license that is scanned by the Raptor Technologies system and the photo of the person is printed on the visitor's pass that they wear to properly identify themselves to the campus. R.5.: School districts should implement procedures to ensure that all faculty and staff are required to wear visible photo ID badges while on campus. (F...
R5
Schools and educators should be encouraged to collaborate with the various available AI consortiums and think tanks, such as OCDE and CLAOC, to effectively implement AI and establish basic tenets for its use. The recommendation has been implemented. Please accept the information provided herein as the District's responses to the Orange County Grand Jury's Factual Findings and Recommendation in the Report. Once again, we appreciate the time and attention that the Grand Jury devoted to this very i...
Response: Implemented
Score: 0
: The recommendation has been implemented, school campus faculty and staff are provided with a photo ID badge and are expected to visibly wear them. R.6.: All school districts with middle or high school campuses should consider using student ID cards in a format to be worn as student ID badges while on campus. (F.6.)
* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.