Note: Missing finding numbers detected:
F14, F15, F16
Findings and Recommendations
14 findings
While all city and county planning departments have demonstrated a good understanding of the new State housing laws and the need to facilitate more housing, the failure to do so in a timely manner has served to further decrease the availability of housing and further increase the need and cost of more housing.
No recommendations for this finding
With the planned growth of UCSC to 28,000 students, the potential demand for off campus housing for students, faculty and staff has the potential to make the affordable housing problem even worse.
Related Recommendations (2)
, the County of Santa Cruz should demonstrate progress in working collaboratively with UCSC to develop housing sites that are affordable for UCSC students and essential workers. (F2)
, the City of Santa Cruz should demonstrate progress in working collaboratively with UCSC to develop housing sites that are affordable for UCSC students and essential workers. (F2) City of Watsonville:
The County of Santa Cruz has identified several sites for higher density housing, identified sites along transportation corridors for housing and changed zoning laws to allow more mixed use developments, however in the past several years, few low income homes have been built or approved.
Related Recommendations (1)
, the County of Santa Cruz should demonstrate a plan to work with other county municipalities as well as other for profit and non-profit agencies to develop low income housing for workers in the county, (particularly on properties such as the old drive-in theater acreage which is adjacent to transportation corridors. (F3, F6)
Capitola has made little progress towards achieving housing goals, particularly for low income housing. Although the City identified sites for mixed use developments, they have made little progress towards developing those sites.
Related Recommendations (2)
the City of Capitola should identify enough parcels of land, zoned appropriately, to meet the new RHNA housing allocations for all income levels, especially low income housing. (F4 – F6, F8)
the City of Capitola should show significant progress towards planning and facilitating the construction of mixed use businesses and housing on identified parcels of land in the City. (F4, F6 – F8)
Capitola has focused primarily on streamlining the construction of ADUs as a means to increase housing. However, there is little evidence that ADUs are prioritized for rental to local workers, and there is little chance that ADUs alone can meet the housing needs for the 6th Cycle Housing Element.
Related Recommendations (1)
the City of Capitola should identify enough parcels of land, zoned appropriately, to meet the new RHNA housing allocations for all income levels, especially low income housing. (F4 – F6, F8)
Capitola and the County of Santa Cruz need to work together to facilitate significant housing in the mid-county area where a large percentage of jobs are located.
Related Recommendations (5)
the City of Capitola should identify enough parcels of land, zoned appropriately, to meet the new RHNA housing allocations for all income levels, especially low income housing. (F4 – F6, F8)
the City of Capitola should show significant progress towards planning and facilitating the construction of mixed use businesses and housing on identified parcels of land in the City. (F4, F6 – F8)
, the City of Capitola should demonstrate a plan to work with the County of Santa Cruz as well as other for profit and non-profit agencies to develop housing close to transportation corridors along Hwy 1 and 41st Avenue. (F6, F7, F13)
the County of Santa Cruz should demonstrate progress towards identifying sites and planning for increased housing along the transportation corridors in mid-county. (F6)
, the County of Santa Cruz should demonstrate a plan to work with other county municipalities as well as other for profit and non-profit agencies to develop low income housing for workers in the county, (particularly on properties such as the old drive-in theater acreage which is adjacent to transportation corridors. (F3, F6)
The City of Capitola has made little progress towards facilitating the development of the Capitola Mall as a mixed use project which could accommodate both business and housing.
Related Recommendations (2)
the City of Capitola should show significant progress towards planning and facilitating the construction of mixed use businesses and housing on identified parcels of land in the City. (F4, F6 – F8)
, the City of Capitola should demonstrate a plan to work with the County of Santa Cruz as well as other for profit and non-profit agencies to develop housing close to transportation corridors along Hwy 1 and 41st Avenue. (F6, F7, F13)
The City of Capitola claims to have significantly fewer resources to attract housing planners and builders than do the bigger municipalities of Santa Cruz, Watsonville and the County of Santa Cruz, but that does not mean the City should be exempt from the need to construct housing for local low income workers.
Related Recommendations (2)
the City of Capitola should identify enough parcels of land, zoned appropriately, to meet the new RHNA housing allocations for all income levels, especially low income housing. (F4 – F6, F8)
the City of Capitola should show significant progress towards planning and facilitating the construction of mixed use businesses and housing on identified parcels of land in the City. (F4, F6 – F8)
The City of Scotts Valley has facilitated the building of market rate housing in recent years, but has made little effort to develop housing for low income workers. Housing Our Workers published June 2, 2023 2022-2023 Consolidated Final Report with Responses 205
Related Recommendations (2)
the City of Scotts Valley should identify enough parcels of land, zoned appropriately, to meet the new RHNA housing allocations for all income levels, especially low income housing. (F9) Housing Our Workers published June 2, 2023 206 Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury
, the City of Scotts Valley should demonstrate a plan to work with other county municipalities as well as other for profit and non-profit agencies to develop low income housing for workers in the City. (F9 – F11)
The City of Scotts Valley has made little progress towards developing the Town Square project which could accommodate both business and housing.
Related Recommendations (2)
, the City of Scotts Valley should show significant progress towards planning and facilitating the construction of mixed use businesses and housing on identified parcels of land in the City. (F10)
, the City of Scotts Valley should demonstrate a plan to work with other county municipalities as well as other for profit and non-profit agencies to develop low income housing for workers in the City. (F9 – F11)
The City of Scotts Valley claims to have significantly fewer resources to attract housing planners and builders than do the bigger municipalities of Santa Cruz, Watsonville and the County of Santa Cruz, but that does not mean the City should be exempt from the need to construct housing for local low income workers.
Related Recommendations (1)
, the City of Scotts Valley should demonstrate a plan to work with other county municipalities as well as other for profit and non-profit agencies to develop low income housing for workers in the City. (F9 – F11)
While all local municipalities have voiced support for prioritizing housing for local workers, only some of them have clear local preference guidelines that give some priority to local workers. Without clear guidelines and incentives, new housing is more likely to be purchased by those who do not live and work here.
Related Recommendations (5)
the City of Capitola should develop clear, measureable guidelines to ensure that local preference is given to local workers in the construction of ADUs as well as low income housing. (F12)
the City of Scotts Valley should develop clear, measureable guidelines to ensure that local preference is given to local workers in the construction of low income housing. (F12)
the County of Santa Cruz should develop clear, measureable guidelines to ensure that local preference is given to local workers in the construction of low income housing. (F12)
, the City of Santa Cruz should develop clear, measureable guidelines to ensure that preference is given to local workers in the construction of low income housing. (F12) Housing Our Workers published June 2, 2023 2022-2023 Consolidated Final Report with Responses 207
, the City of Watsonville should develop clear, measureable guidelines to ensure that local preference is given to local workers in the construction of low income housing. (F12)
All municipalities are trying to identify and facilitate the building of housing projects, but most of that is done independently of the other municipalities or with outside partners. Since workforce housing and transportation gridlock is a county-wide problem, all county municipalities need to work more closely together and with property owners to develop housing solutions.
Related Recommendations (6)
, the City of Capitola should demonstrate a plan to work with the County of Santa Cruz as well as other for profit and non-profit agencies to develop housing close to transportation corridors along Hwy 1 and 41st Avenue. (F6, F7, F13)
the City of Capitola should demonstrate that they have reestablished regular meetings of a workgroup or entity that would allow planners from all 5 county jurisdictions to share ideas on housing development and develop joint projects. (F13) City of Scotts Valley:
the City of Scotts Valley should demonstrate that they have reestablished regular meetings of a workgroup or other entity that would allow planners from all 5 county jurisdictions to share ideas on housing development and develop joint projects. (F13) County of Santa Cruz:
the County of Santa Cruz should demonstrate that they have reestablished regular meetings of a workgroup or other entity that would allow planners from all 5 county jurisdictions to share ideas on housing development and develop joint projects. (F13) City of Santa Cruz
the City of Santa Cruz should demonstrate that they have reestablished regular meetings of a workgroup or other entity that would allow planners from all 5 county jurisdictions to share ideas on housing development and develop joint projects. (F13)
the City of Watsonville should demonstrate that they have reestablished regular meetings of a workgroup or other entity that would allow planners from all 5 county jurisdictions to share ideas on housing development and develop joint projects. (F13)
All municipalities are trying to identify and facilitate the building of housing projects, but most of that is done independently of the other municipalities or with outside partners. Since workforce housing and transportation gridlock is a county-wide problem, all county municipalities need to work more closely together and with property owners to develop housing solutions. __ AGREE __X PARTIALLY DISAGREE __ DISAGREE Response explanation (required for a response other than Agree): Please see response to F13 above. Invited Response from the Director, Santa Cruz Community Development Housing Our Workers Due by August 31, 2023 2022-2023 Consolidated Final Report with Responses 305
No recommendations for this finding
Agency Responses
2
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations.
Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.
No structured response data extracted yet.
View the PDF for full details.
No structured response data extracted yet.
View the PDF for full details.