📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Humboldt County Grand Jury
• 2007-2008
Appointed Department Head Evaluations
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 2 findings
F1
Page 12
There is no policy or procedure for annual written job performance evaluations for department heads appointed by the Board of Supervisors.
F2
Page 12
There is a lack of clarity among the Board of Supervisors and subcommittees as to who is responsible for evaluation of appointed department heads.
Recommendations 2
-
R1Page 12The Board of Supervisors adopts policy and procedure for annual written job performance evaluations for all department heads who report to the Board of Supervisors. Policy to include that such evaluation is kept as part of the employee’s permanent personnel file.
-
R2Page 12The Board of Supervisors should either conduct regular performance evaluations through a subcommittee of the board or do what is necessary to direct the Chief Administrative Officer to conduct performance evaluations, with the authority necessary to make the process timely and effective. Such direction to include making the evaluations part of the employee’s personnel file. 10