📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Mendocino County Grand Jury • 1999-2000

Conflict of Interest

2 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 4 findings

F1 Page 30
The Grand Jury found, based on all the information presented, no evidence of conflict of interest, misuse of office, nor conspiracy to defraud by the former Deputy District Attorney who prosecuted the case. Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board neither agrees or disagrees with this finding.
F2 Page 30
Based on the documents and official records reviewed, the account of the arrest, trial and conviction offered by the complainant was not supported. Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board neither agrees or disagrees with this finding.
F3 Page 30
The new Policy and Procedures Manual developed by the District Attorney in 1999, contains specific conflict of interest guidelines that are understood by Deputy District Attorneys. Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board agrees with this finding. 30 1999-2000 Mendocino County Grand Jury Final Report
F4 Page 31
State standards and Code of Ethics were in place in 1997 and were well known and understood by those Deputy District Attorneys interviewed. Both in 1997 and currently when questions of ethics or conflict of interest arise, Deputy District Attorneys seek guidance from senior staff members. Response (Board of Supervisors): The Board agrees with this finding.

Recommendations 2