📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
Mendocino County Grand Jury
• 2008-2009
The cover of this report was designed by graphic artist Tobin Keller. The images are of Pomo Indian baskets from the
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 100 findings
F1
Redwood Coast Seniors, Inc. was established as a California non-profit 501(c) 3 corporation in 1973 to operate a senior center in Fort Bragg and provide services for seniors on the Mendocino Coast.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Redwood Coast Senior Center is governed by a board of directors currently composed of six (6) members. Three members constitute a quorum. The bylaws state that the board shall consist of a minimum of five and a maximum of nine members. The board is self-selecting. Candidates are nominated by the board and approved by a quorum of the board. The Board receives no formal training.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
Jurors were told that under prior bylaws, there was a seven (7) year term limit. A copy of these bylaws is no longer available to the board members; nor was it provided to the Grand Jury. According to the undated bylaws that were provided to Jurors in October 2008, members serve a three-year term with no cap on the number of terms one can serve. There were no minutes on file that documented adoption of these bylaws.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
Minutes indicate that these bylaws were amended in September of 2008 to permit two members of the Executive Committee to transact business with the full authority of the board. The only restriction is that the Executive Committee is required to report to the full board on all actions taken. Ratification by the full board is not required.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
Many administrative duties of the board are delegated to an executive committee composed of the President, Vice President and the Treasurer. The current President and Vice President have served on the executive committee for more than twelve years. The Executive Director reported that many “sensitive” issues are addressed by the executive committee which keeps no minutes of its actions. Not all executive committee decisions are discussed by the full board.
No recommendations for this finding
F6
The board’s intent is to hold monthly meetings, but meetings are not always held.
No recommendations for this finding
F7
Board members described their roles as policy setting, financial and operational oversight, and selection and supervision of the Executive Director.
No recommendations for this finding
F8
As of March 9, 2009, the current Executive Director had been employed for the past 12 years and had recently submitted his resignation, effective March 13, 2009. Some board members credit him with having maintained the financial health of the Center which is financially solvent, with an annual budget of just under $1,000,000.
No recommendations for this finding
F9
The Executive Director provides the board with staff reports on Center activities, finances and personnel and, until recently, has been responsible for preparation of the minutes.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
The Grand Jury requested copies of board minutes and discovered that not all meetings had been documented by accurate, complete minutes that have been reviewed and formally approved in subsequent board meetings. In several cases minutes for one month were identical to those prepared for the previous meeting.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
The Area Agency on Aging (AAA) is a major funder of the Center. AAA channels county and federal funds for senior programs to local non-profit agencies and serves an oversight function to ensure that the funds are properly spent.
No recommendations for this finding
F12
The Center reports monthly to AAA on the number of meals served, number of meals delivered and the number of clients served in the adult day care center. AAA annually inspects the financial and service records.
No recommendations for this finding
F13
At two public meetings last year, AAA heard complaints from the public about the Center. Copies of the written complaints were forwarded to the Center board. These expressed concerns about governance of the Center, the termination of long-term employees and general dissatisfaction with the Executive Director’s regular absences from the site.
No recommendations for this finding
F14
On August 30, 2008 the Center responded to AAA saying …the executive committee has reviewed these letters which contain allegations of wrong doings unspecified and/or related to personnel issues that are not subject to discussion as they are ‘classified’. The (former) Executive Director told jurors that he has not done staff evaluations since, in California, employees may be terminated “at will” and “doing evaluations can lead to lawsuits.”
No recommendations for this finding
F15
Grand Jury members attended the December 2008 meeting at which board members voted to conduct an evaluation of the Executive Director and to order an audit of the Center’s finances by a certified public accountant. On March 9, 2009, Jurors were informed that the Center is in the process of soliciting bids for audit services. Findings: Staffing
No recommendations for this finding
F16
The board hired the (now former) Executive Director twelve years ago and gave him authority and responsibility for running the Center. Running the Center includes day-to-day operations; hiring, firing and supervising all staff; program development; preparing budgets, grant writing, fundraising and establishing salaries and fiscal controls. Only the Executive Director position reports to the board. The Executive Director is the Center’s sole official contact with the board.
No recommendations for this finding
F17
In the last two years the staff size has ranged from 15 to 20 employees. Center documents show that staff turnover has included nine employees who left in 2007 and ten who left in 2008. In February 2009, there were 16 employees, including the Executive Director, and four on-call workers. Eight of the sixteen employees have served less than two years. The remaining eight employees, including the Executive Director, had worked at the center for an extended period.
No recommendations for this finding
F18
The Executive Director reported that, as of September 2008, “…the median tenure of the Center’s employees was 7.83 years.”
No recommendations for this finding
F19
The Executive Director and the Chef/Operations Manager positions are salaried. All other employees are paid hourly.
No recommendations for this finding
F20
The employee handbook is dated 2003 and is not fully consistent with current practice.1
No recommendations for this finding
F21
Full-time employees,2 other than the (former) Executive Director, accrue vacation at the annual rate of 80 hours for the first three years of employment, 120 hours in years four through nine and 160 hours thereafter. The stated policy is that: …accrual of vacation time up to 200 hours is permitted. Vacation time beyond 200 hours is forfeited unless approved, in writing, by the executive director.
No recommendations for this finding
F22
The (former) Executive Director accrued vacation at the annual rate of 480 hours (12 weeks per year). The Grand Jury found no evidence of a cap having been established on accrual of these vacation hours and the Executive Director stated that he “knew of no cap” and that he had cashed in “about $5,000” in vacation hours when he purchased a car.
No recommendations for this finding
F23
At the time of the investigation, the (former) Executive Director was completing the second year of the four-year law degree program at Empire College in Santa Rosa.
No recommendations for this finding
F24
The July 2008 board minutes reflect a discussion and approval of the Executive Director’s telecommuting to permit legal education that is described as “directly beneficial” to the Center. Minutes note that “telecommuting is not unusual for executives.” Minutes do not specify an agreed upon work schedule reflecting the 2+ work days per week that the Executive Director was regularly out of town.
No recommendations for this finding
F25
The Executive Director reported that he was attending law school from 6-9 p.m. in Santa Rosa on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday and that he was at the Center on Monday and Friday and part of the day on Tuesday.
No recommendations for this finding
F26
The Center board provided the Grand Jury with copies of written complaints it received about the Center in 2006 and 2008. The departure of key staff members in each of those years appears to have prompted a flurry of complaints about leadership and management issues. Written complaints state that: • “The director is seldom seen.” • “Repeated requests for copies of bylaws or procedures have been refused.” • “Employees say they are afraid to speak up.” • “No criticism, no matter how constructive, is allowed.” • “Morale is low at the Senior Center; volunteers are unhappy. Employees are unhappy.” • “Employees feel that they are not treated fairly. They are fearful of their jobs...” 1 One example is that the handbook states that employees are paid for their lunch breaks and this is no longer the case. The Employee Handbook assigns health insurance benefits to those working a minimum of 31 hours per week. Regularly scheduled employees who work 20 to 40 hours per week receive other benefits proportionate to the hours worked. • “They [2006 board members] seem out of touch with daily operation of the Center.” • “…employees are nervous and intimidated. …no one will speak up for fear of retaliation...” • “The Director comes to work when he feels like it and attends law school during work days, while receiving full pay and benefits.” • “I’ve observed unethical business practices, harassment, and unprofessional conduct by the Executive Director.” • “If anyone voiced their opinion or questioned his authority, they were fired without notice.” • “There never was a backup plan in case someone called in sick [for staffing of the day care program]. There was just a big shuffle of personnel into day care to cover...” • “Due to unethical business and personnel procedures many employees and volunteers have left under duress or been fired with little or no explanation.” • “Much of the dissatisfaction revolves around his [the Executive Director’s] lack of interaction with the employees and volunteers.” • “Disagreeing with [the Executive Director] was cause for dismissal.”
No recommendations for this finding
F27
The Executive Director asserted that “…a concerted effort has been made by a small group of people to damage [his] reputation.”
No recommendations for this finding
F28
The Executive Director was paid a salary of $71,000 per year plus benefits, an annual bonus and reimbursement of business expenses. There was no formal process for review and approval of his expense reports. This past year, when the Center was forced to draw $50,000 from its reserve fund, the Executive Director received a bonus of $2,000. This was half of the prior year’s bonus. He also received law school tuition payments of $3,000 per semester.
No recommendations for this finding
F29
The Executive Director stated that the board had approved tuition payments to him of $3,000 per semester, but the Grand Jury found no documentation of this in the board minutes provided through October 2008.
No recommendations for this finding
F30
In March 2009, the Executive Director provided a letter signed by the Vice President of the Board (dated March 10, 2009) retroactively stating that …In 2006 the Executive Committee offered tuition support to our executive director to complete his bachelors degree at Sonoma State University at $3,000 a semester. During that semester he found he was able to gain admission to the Empire College School of Law; he was authorized to continue with that same level of support, and was granted permission to telecommute to work from Santa Rosa two days a week.
No recommendations for this finding
F31
Also in March 2009, the Executive Director provided Jurors with a copy of the August 2008 board minutes that were not included in response to the initial document request. These newly provided minutes indicate the board’s approval of the law school tuition payments that he had been receiving, ostensibly with executive committee approval, since 2007.
No recommendations for this finding
F32
Of the three board members who were interviewed in fall of 2008, one acknowledged that tuition was being paid. The other two, including the President and the Treasurer, stated that they had no knowledge that tuition was being paid. The fourth, a new board member interviewed in 2009, stated that he learned of the tuition when it was discussed “…at a recent board meeting.”
No recommendations for this finding
F33
The tuition payments were distributed by check, payable to the Executive Director and entered in the Center’s books as a “training expense.” Like other payments under $5,000, these checks required only the signature of the Executive Director. The Executive Director first stated that he “…did not know whether they were subjected to payroll taxes and withholding.” He then informed the Jurors that the payments “…were not subject to withholding and that they were not reported as income.”
No recommendations for this finding
F34
The Ukiah Senior Center Executive Director supervises a medical model day care center and a full service senior program with a combined staff of 26 and an annual budget of $975,000. This position involves a full work schedule. It pays an annual salary of $50,000. Employees at the Ukiah Senior Center received a bonus for the first time in 2008. The amount was $50 for each employee. Findings: Finances
No recommendations for this finding
F35
Some board members stated that they valued the Director’s track record for managing the Center’s budget of just under $1 Million per year.
No recommendations for this finding
F36
Total income for Fiscal Year (FY) 2007-08 was $992,729, including $268,942 from AAA as partial funding for group and home delivered meals, community outreach and the Day Care Center.
No recommendations for this finding
F37
The Centers’ 2008-09 AAA contract provides for payments of $222,459. This represents a decline of 17% from the prior year.
No recommendations for this finding
F38
Mendocino Transit Authority (MTA) has committed to $147,800 for the Center’s transit services during 2008-09, a decline of 5% from the previous year. Further cuts are likely under the terms of the California State Budget that was adopted in February 2009.
No recommendations for this finding
F39
The Center is in its fifth year of a $100,000/year grant from United Way to implement an innovative suicide prevention program at 11 senior centers in Mendocino and Lake Counties. The Center distributes a large part of this grant to support program implementation at the other sites.
No recommendations for this finding
F40
Transportation fees, meal donations, cash and in-kind donations, and fund raisers, including proceeds from the volunteer-operated Granny’s Attic thrift store account for 49% of the budget. Year-end profit and loss statements show gross thrift store sales of $19,711 in FY 2006-07 and $18,802 in FY 2007-08.
No recommendations for this finding
F41
The Executive Director has been reluctant to impose facility charges or establish suggested contributions for group use and discontinued advertising of event space because there have not been “…a lot of takers.”
No recommendations for this finding
F42
The last formal audit of the Center’s finances was in 2002. The July 2007 board minutes document repeated board requests for more complete financial reports with comparisons to the prior year. Jurors were told that since June or July 2008 the board has received a year-to-date budget report with summaries (by account) of the current and prior year. Journal entries are not routinely provided.
No recommendations for this finding
F43
At the December board meeting, which was attended by Jurors, the board voted to contract for an independent audit of the Center. Minutes of this meeting have not been published but, in March 2009, Jurors were told by the interim Executive Director that the Center is engaged in a bidding process for audit services. Findings: Programs
No recommendations for this finding
F44
The Center is open Monday through Friday. It is closed on holidays.
No recommendations for this finding
F45
Meal service in the dining room is very pleasant. Diners are seated at comfortable tables and may choose between the day’s hot meal and a self- serve salad bar. Volunteers serve the hot meals and beverages.
No recommendations for this finding
F46
Congregate (group) meals are also provided at the Mendocino Presbyterian Church on Mondays and Wednesdays and at the Albion Firehouse on Fridays.
No recommendations for this finding
F47
Varied menus meet nutritional standards set by the AAA. The lunch program is well-attended and participants are sometimes entertained by volunteer musicians.
No recommendations for this finding
F48
Participation in the congregate meal program has increased steadily over the last five years. In FY 2002-03 the Center served 21,412 meals; in FY 2007- 08 it served 26,895.
No recommendations for this finding
F49
AAA is the primary funding agency for the meals program, but the amount provided does not cover the full cost of meals. Those who are able are asked for a $4 meal contribution. Persons under 60 are asked to donate $7.
No recommendations for this finding
F50
The Center also provides home delivery of Meals-on-Wheels to North Coast residents from Fort Bragg to Albion and approximately three to four miles inland. This program has grown steadily, from delivering 7,123 meals in FY 2002-03, to providing 16,435 meals in FY 2007-08.
No recommendations for this finding
F51
The Meals-on-Wheels program is implemented by one paid employee and several volunteers. All are reimbursed for mileage traveled at the federal rate.
No recommendations for this finding
F52
Meals-on-Wheels drivers work with Outreach Program staff to provide a critical communication link between clients and the Center. Their regular contacts with clients help to ensure that support services will be made available as needed.
No recommendations for this finding
F53
Through a program funded by United Way, the Executive Director trains Meals-on-Wheels drivers to recognize signs of depression in homebound elders and recommend mental health referrals for those who display symptoms that put them at risk of suicide. The grant terms require that new drivers be trained by June of each year.
No recommendations for this finding
F54
AAA is the principal funder of the social day care center which provides supervised activities and care for cognition impaired individuals and support for Alzheimer patients and their caregivers. Participants pay up to $45/day on a sliding scale, according to their financial circumstances.
No recommendations for this finding
F55
This is the only social model adult day care program in the county. While staffing requirements, set by the California Department on Aging, are less stringent than those for a medical model program, two responsible persons must be present at all times and one of these must be a paid staff member. Programs must maintain a ratio of no more than five clients to one attendant. All attendants are required to be fingerprinted and pass a health screening, including a test for tuberculosis.
No recommendations for this finding
F56
Day Care Center participation has declined steadily from a peak of 2,257 census days in FY 2005-06 to 1,572 census days in FY 2007-08. Even after reducing service from five to four days weekly, the program currently has difficulty achieving the minimum average daily census of ten participants that is required for AAA funding. The program has not been actively marketed. The (former) Executive Director cited affordability as one reason for this decline despite the sliding scale of $0-45 per day.
No recommendations for this finding
F57
The Center operates an Outreach Program to respond to inquiries, identify the needs of older adults and provide appropriate services or referrals. In FY 2006-07, the program recorded 1,811 contacts. This increased to 2,758 in FY 2007-08.
No recommendations for this finding
F58
The Center provided Jurors with copies of letters expressing heartfelt appreciation for the services provided by the Meals-on-Wheels and Outreach staff and volunteers.
No recommendations for this finding
F59
MTA provides state funds to subsidize the Center’s transportation program. The Center regularly operates two buses to transport seniors to the center for meals, activities and day care. The door-through-door wheelchair-lift- equipped bus service runs from Ten-Mile to Albion. This service is available to adults over 60 and disabled adults of any age at heavily subsidized fares based on the distance traveled.3
No recommendations for this finding
F60
The Center is required to file monthly reports of transit costs with MTA.
No recommendations for this finding
F61
The Center accommodates a limited array of social and educational activities, most of which are provided by outside organizations or volunteers.
No recommendations for this finding
F62
Several computers, closely spaced at tables in a small room, provide high- speed internet access at no cost. At the time of the Grand Jury site visit, a volunteer was assisting seniors with the computers.
No recommendations for this finding
F63
The Center sponsors bingo games, a support group for caregivers, and blood pressure monitoring.
No recommendations for this finding
F64
Volunteers staff “Granny’s Attic” thrift shop. Located at the back of the Center, it is open from ten to four, five days a week.
No recommendations for this finding
F65
A volunteer trained by the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) provides income tax assistance for seniors at the Center free of charge. Those who receive this service may make a donation to the Center, but this is not requested or actively encouraged. The “door-through-door” service offered by senior centers supports individuals who need assistance out and back into their homes. Drivers also assist seniors with packages or luggage. Dial-a-Ride services only transport passengers “curb-to-curb.”
No recommendations for this finding
F66
A local Tai Chi trainer uses Center facilities to offer classes to seniors for which participants pay her directly. Goals of these classes include improving balance and reducing falls. The Center charges no rent for this use of the facility.
No recommendations for this finding
F67
Various groups hold meetings at the center. Some make a donation for use of the facilities but no fee is required. The Soroptimists, Kiwanis, Toastmasters, Ocean Wave Quilting Guild and Alcoholics Anonymous meet at the Center.
No recommendations for this finding
F68
College of the Redwoods offers two exercise classes, a popular class on the origins of radio, and one called “Protect Your Family and Property” to seniors who register as students at the College. The College pays no room use fee.
No recommendations for this finding
F69
The Center shares a parking lot and is attached by a breezeway to Fort Bragg Middle School, but there are currently no joint programs between the two facilities and the relationship has become strained.
No recommendations for this finding
F70
Students may not attend formal classes in the Center building because it does not meet seismic standards for a school building but they may participate in outdoor or drop-in activities. In the past, seniors provided tutoring and there was a program in which seniors taught bocce ball and provided opportunities for non-English speaking students to practice communicating in English. Fort Bragg Unified School District administrators expressed interest in reinstating mutually beneficial joint programs.
No recommendations for this finding
F71
Board minutes reflect numerous suggestions from Center participants and board members that have not been implemented. These include selling gift cards for lunches and increasing collection of rental fees. Dances and ice cream socials have been proposed. Class suggestions include: arts and crafts, bridge lessons, yoga classes and programs in financial management, investments and insurance. Health-related suggestions include mental health screening, diabetes support groups and additional blood pressure screening times.
No recommendations for this finding
F72
The website shown on the Center’s brochure and letterhead (www.rcsmendo.org) links to a domain name “placeholder” that provides no information on the Center. An internet search for “Redwood Coast Seniors” connects to a site at http://web1.mcn.org/b/redwoodcoastseniors/home.htm. The most recent dated information on this site is from 2002.
No recommendations for this finding
F73
The Center’s monthly newsletter has been discontinued. An activity calendar and menus are published monthly.
No recommendations for this finding
F74
The graphically attractive brochures accurately state meal schedules but include little specific program information and provide a link to an undeveloped website. Findings: Facilities
No recommendations for this finding
F75
The Center is located in the same complex with Cotton Auditorium. It is connected by a ramp and breezeway to Fort Bragg Middle School and overlooks the recently installed infrastructure for a large school garden.
No recommendations for this finding
F76
The Center has approximately 80 years remaining on its 99 year lease of the space from Fort Bragg Unified School District (FBUSD). It pays no monthly rent.
No recommendations for this finding
F77
The Center also has a garden area with a pond, bocce ball and horseshoe courts and picnic tables. A large barbecue, mounted on a trailer, was purchased with funding from the Community Foundation of Mendocino County. These facilities are little used and poorly maintained.
No recommendations for this finding
F78
Both the Middle School and Cotton Auditorium have undergone extensive historic restoration. These buildings are all about 70 years old. The exterior of the Senior Center was last painted about 12 years ago using labor and equipment provided by Georgia Pacific, Rotary and Soroptimists. It is in need of exterior repairs and painting.
No recommendations for this finding
F79
Teachers and visitors to the Middle School and Cotton Auditorium, as well as seniors and Center employees share a large common parking lot on land leased to the Center by FBUSD for a one-time charge of $5,000. Construction of the lot cost approximately $30,000 and was paid for, in large part, by a grant to the Center. Issues around the use of this lot are not clearly addressed in the terms of the lease and have led to friction between FBUSD and the Center.
No recommendations for this finding
F80
Jurors observed that the inside of the building is freshly painted. The roof was replaced about seven years ago by a Parlin Fork Conservation Camp crew supervised by a local roofing contractor.
No recommendations for this finding
F81
The entry hall is lined with oil portraits of Center participants painted by a local artist who volunteered his time and scheduled individual sittings to create the images.
No recommendations for this finding
F82
Activity announcements are displayed on bulletin boards in the hall.
No recommendations for this finding
F83
During the course of the investigation, a new bulletin board was installed in the sunroom for posting board agendas and minutes. However, in late February, the most recent posted information was dated October 2008.
No recommendations for this finding
F84
A large room near the entry is used for classes and adult social day care which is offered four days a week. Furniture in this room is new and suitable for medical settings. The room contains a donated large screen television.
No recommendations for this finding
F85
The dining room is pleasantly decorated, cheerful and inviting. Three years ago, a crew from Parlin Fork Conservation Camp removed worn, glued down carpet from the dining room and restored the historic wood floor, correcting a serious trip hazard.
No recommendations for this finding
F86
The Center also has a large community meeting room with the same type of deteriorating carpet that was replaced in the dining room. Since restoration of the dining room floor there has been no further progress to eliminate this unsafe condition.
No recommendations for this finding
F87
The Center has an automatic back-up propane generator purchased with primary funding from AAA. Jurors were told that in the event of an extended power outage the Center will remain open beyond the usual hours to provide a warm, lighted place for seniors.
No recommendations for this finding
F88
Entering at-risk students attend a three-week summer program. Those who test two or more years below grade level in reading are placed in a corrective reading core classroom where they study history and literature with on-going assistance to develop reading skills.
No recommendations for this finding
F89
The Principal and teachers expressed frustration at the lack of parent involvement despite offering coffee chats and parent tours. Turnout at school functions is extremely low. There is an active site council, but efforts to establish a PTO have been largely unsuccessful.
No recommendations for this finding
F90
Baechtel Grove partners with Kids’ Club and Alienza and has relationships with Willits Fire and Police Departments, Rotary, and the local hospital. Findings Specific to Fort Bragg Middle School (FBUSD)
No recommendations for this finding
F91
Fort Bragg Middle School occupies one wing of the City’s historic high school campus which also includes Cotton Auditorium and the Redwood Coast Senior Center. Built in the late 1930s, the school and Cotton Auditorium have recently undergone a major rehabilitation to bring them up to code while preserving their historic integrity. The result is a campus that is a source of pride to students, faculty and the broader community.
No recommendations for this finding
F92
Solar panels will be installed on the middle school roof during the summer of 2009 as part of a project that will ultimately include panels at all sites and will provide 90% of the District’s electricity.
No recommendations for this finding
F93
Students have access to the professional quality performing arts facility, playing fields and a spacious gymnasium.
No recommendations for this finding
F94
Infrastructure for a new school garden has recently been installed with funding and labor provided by the Campbell Timber Group. A collaboration is being explored with the Mendocino Coast Botanical Gardens Master Gardeners Program to help develop the garden.
No recommendations for this finding
F95
Nutritious meals are prepared on site and served in an attractive, but noisy cafeteria. Students can gather around adjacent outdoor tables, but food is no longer permitted outside due to concerns about contamination by the ever- present gulls.
No recommendations for this finding
F96
The large, well-stocked library features natural light from windows that overlook a tree-filled canyon. Mosaic murals depict historic scenes of Mendocino County. The librarian maintains a glass case with a rotating display honoring students and staff with birthdays in the current month.
No recommendations for this finding
F97
Halls and classrooms are unusually spacious and banks of lockers are provided for student use.
No recommendations for this finding
F98
Sports facilities include playing fields and a recently renovated gymnasium that was noteworthy for the absence of insulation.
No recommendations for this finding
F99
The Emergency Response Plan is the most comprehensive of the four plans reviewed. It includes detailed assignments for all staff, with alternates appointed for key tasks. A media directory is included to facilitate county- wide emergency outreach. The Administrative Council meets regularly to work on the plan. Principals communicate details to teachers at their sites.
No recommendations for this finding
F100
Emergency fire blankets are provided in science labs.
No recommendations for this finding