This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 6 findings
Recommendations 6
-
R1Page 21The County must work toward standardizing its software, hardware, and systems to insure all county employees can work together on the same systems efficiently.
-
R2Page 21The BOS, CAO and the IT Director must take the lead on the IT Steering Committee with participation by other key department heads.
-
R3Page 21The BOS, CAO and Director of IT must create a multi-year strategic technology funding plan.
-
R4Page 21The IT Steering Committee must be assigned the responsibility for integrating, prioritizing, and approving county technology projects, purchases, and funding.
-
R5Page 21The IT Steering Committee must revise and update controls on purchasing of technologies, so that redundant systems are not purchased or adversely affect IT infrastructure.
-
R6Page 21The County must aggressively pursue technological advancements with the objectives of reduction in cost and improvement in efficiency. The El Dorado County Board of Supervisors, coordinating with the above mentioned agencies, is required by Penal Code 933 and 933.05 to respond to all Findings and Recommendations contained within this report. See page vi for the proper method for responding to Findings and Recommendations. 2003/2004 El Dorado County Grand Jury Investigations & Reports 13
Agency Responses 1
Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.