📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report

This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.

Imperial County Grand Jury • 2015-2016

of Investigation: Imperial County Department of Social Services

Published: June 15, 2016 73 pages
View PDF View Full Original

Findings 14 findings

F01
The television sort of DNA processing and presentations in court have very little to do with reality as a rule and not everyone understands that.
F1
CAL, like other state prisons, may be impacted by the court ordered release of validated gang inmates to the mainlines from the more secure SHU. Previous California prison history shows many gang related crimes take place when higher ranking gang members are on the mainlines.
F02
The processing and presentation of DNA evidence is not nearly as complicated or as sensational as it was when it was presented in court in a well known Los Angeles County case in the 1990s.
F2
The vocations training inmates receive looks to have practical applications for when inmates are eventually released.
F03
While DNA evidence is an important tool it is not needed in every case.
F3
There were only five beds available in the medical unit which did not seem to be enough for the increasing inmate population.
F04
Neither agency cited a local case where they thought DNA evidence would have changed a local case that had already been concluded. While the Grand Jury committee did not personally speak with representatives of CAL-DOJ, it was aware that there is a web page they have through the California Office of the Attorney General, Bureau of Forensic Services (BFS) involving DNA evidence. It is located here: https://oag.ca.gov/bfs The BFS provides interesting information on the collection of the sort of DNA used such as these two studies: Study 1: This study of 100 adult felony arrestees with no prior felony convictions found the majority of DNA database hits between these persons and murder, rape & robbery crimes, come from DNA database samples collected at their arrest for drug, DUI, fraud, & property offenses. Study 2: This study of 3,778 adult felony arrestees found only 8 percent of DNA database hits to murder, rape and robbery crimes come from DNA database samples collected from persons who have their DNA collected at arrest for another murder, rape, or robbery crime. Full report here: https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/bfs/arrestee_2013.pdf It also provides information for the legal removal of persons from the DNA database, for some persons. That includes those under these conditions.  If not charged with a felony  If not convicted of a felony  If misdemeanor conviction, must have no prior felonies  If not a registering sex or arson offender  Other conditions apply Findings: DNA evidence can be a very good tool for court use for either the prosecution or the defense. It should be used in court in cases where evidence might be important enough to prove or disprove guilt or innocence. Response Required: No response is required from either of the agencies contacted. 2015-2016 Imperial County Civil Grand Jury Final Report of Findings SUBJECT OF INVESTIGATION Imperial Valley College (IVC) JUSTIFICATION There are several quality of life issues in Imperial County, one of which is employment. Historically, Imperial County has a significantly high unemployment rate. For January 2016, the Imperial County unemployment rate was 20.5%. In contrast, the California and Federal unemployment rates were 5.7% and 5.2%. One means of improving employment opportunities is through initiatives that elevate a person’s education and skill level. For this reason, the Civil Grand Jury initiated an investigation to evaluate if IVC resources are contributing to an increased level of education and skills in Imperial County. INVESTIGATION
F4
POs know that their clients won’t succeed if they miss court dates and appointments with health and behavioral services. The clients come from homes without cars or access to transportation. For these reasons, the POs often provide the transportation necessary to get clients to the appointments.
F05
It is recommended that if there is a lack of cooperation due to believed HIPAA rules, then the local agency needing important health information should pursue it further and even have subpoenas issued through the court if needed.
F06
It is recommended that persons with behavioral health info, and specifically within BH, attend court sessions when there are people with mental health issues there, particularly if there are questions as to the mental condition of such persons. The court may make orders concerning persons under BH care and direct that records be provided as deemed necessary.
F07
It is recommended that all of the named agencies and others in this county ensure they are doing all they can to see that the general public is safe from harm in general. Attention should also be paid to persons that may need to be placed or remain in custody, where the jail may not always be the best option. The jury acknowledges that there is not always a better option immediately available.
F08
It is recommended that county personnel contact staff at the CDCR diagnostics program and also contact staff at Patton State Hospital. Based on information provided by persons the jury spoke with during the interviews of this inquiry, these may be good models for learning.
F09
It is recommended that a larger and/or more secure place for persons with mental health issues that cannot otherwise be released from custody be found or created. As jail personnel correctly stated, jail is not in itself a cure-all, and it should not be.
F10
It is recommended that better arrangements should be made to send persons in custody with severe mental issues to places outside the county in the meantime until a larger and/or more secure place can be established locally. Miscellaneous Information: This is a partial list but not complete information provided by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services as related to HIPAA: Who Must Follow These Laws We call the entities that must follow the HIPAA regulations “covered entities.” Covered entities include:  Health Plans, including health insurance companies, HMOs, company health plans, and certain government programs that pay for health care, such as Medicare and Medicaid.  Most Health Care Providers—those that conduct certain business electronically, such as electronically billing your health insurance—including most doctors, clinics, hospitals, psychologists, chiropractors, nursing homes, pharmacies, and dentists.  Health Care Clearinghouses—entities that process nonstandard health information they receive from another entity into a standard (i.e., standard electronic format or data content), or vice versa. ==EDIT== Examples of business associates include:  Companies that help your doctors get paid for providing health care, including billing companies and companies that process your health care claims  Companies that help administer health plans  People like outside lawyers, accountants, and IT specialists  Companies that store or destroy medical records ==EDIT== Who Is Not Required to Follow These Laws Many organizations that have health information about you do not have to follow these laws. Examples of organizations that do not have to follow the Privacy and Security Rules include:  Life insurers  Employers  Workers compensation carriers  Most schools and school districts  Many state agencies like child protective service agencies  Most law enforcement agencies  Many municipal offices http://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-individuals/guidance-materials-for-consumers/index.html Patton State Hospital is operated by the Department of State Hospitals located in San Bernardino County. Their web site states the following (in part): The four primary commitment categories of patients treated at DSH-Patton are described below: » Incompetent to Stand Trial (PC 1370) » Mentally Disordered Offenders (Penal Code Section 2962/2972) » Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (PC 1026) » Conservatees (LPS & Murphy) http://www.dsh.ca.gov/Patton/ Response Required: No response is required from any of the agencies contacted. End of Report

Recommendations 14