Trinity County Grand Jury • 2014-2015 • Agency Response
Response to: 2014 to 2015 Final Report

MedicalMJissue

Published: September 18, 2015 52 pages
View Original PDF

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F5

Findings and Recommendations 24 findings

F1
The GJ finds that there is o oversight entity specifically involved to provide a plan for MJ controls and develop ordinances to limit adverse environmental effests Response: Iagree withthisfinding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
The GJ recommends that the County form an interagency task force(including State, Federal, and local citizens) to provide a plan for MJ controls and develop ordinances to limit adverse environmental effects. [July 2015] Response: Requires further analysis. This willtake sometimeto builda taskforce with theappropriatepersonsrepresenting theappropriate stakeholders.
F2
The GJ finds that there is no specific Trinity County permit for medical MJ cultivation which might encourage compliance with SB 420 Cultivation Guidelines and County Code 8.55 (June 2012) that limit MJ grows to no more than eight plants (or 400 square feet) for parcels of 10 acres or greater. Response: / agree with thisfinding. KEITHGROVES JUDYMORRIS KARLFISHER BILLBURTON JOHN FENLEY DISTRICT 1 DISTRICT'2 DISTRICT3 DISTRICT4 DISTRICT5
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
The GJ recommends that the County prepare for changes in MJ laws which may allow for issuance of a permit specific to MJ cultivation. It would not be appropriate to issue a permit at this time (Mendocino County tried this and it met with much resistance since Federal laws currently classify MJ as an illegal drug), [by the Task Force, September2016] Response: Has been implemented. BOS members are in discussion with various stakeholders. Supervisors Groves and Fisher are working on recommendations for the PlanningCommission to consider ina review ofthedraftaggregate grow ordinance and will be bringingthis to theBOSfor action soon. The Planning Commission and theBOShave, in the past,felt thatitbestfor theCounty to leave the "MedicalMJissue"to theStateandfor Trinity Countytoenforce throughlandusecodes only, as thesecodes are typically upheldincourt.
F3
There is no "aggregate grow" allowance which would permit MJ gardens to have excessive plants beyond the numbers specified in Ordinance 315-797. Response: Iagree.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
The GJ recommends that the County continue with Ordinance 315-797and not adopt the aggregategrowordinanceas approved by the PlanningCommission onJuly 12,2012. TrinityCountyisaruralcommunity wherevirtuallyanyonecanfindaplotor caregiver to grow the needed MJ. Allowingaggregate grows may lead to further proliferation oflargeMJ cultivations for black marketprofits. [Noaction needed] Response: Requiresfurther analysis. Alimitednumber ofaggregate grows, inareasof the County that would not interface with residential areas would allow the County to collect administrativefees that wouldpayfor MJenforcement bythe Sheriffs Office andMJcode enforcement inthe Planning/Buildingdepartment.
F4
Trinity County Ordinance 315-797 is enforced primarily following a complaint received bythePlanning Department- itisa"complaint-driven" enforcement, notan "awareness-driven" enforcement. Response: / agreewith thisfinding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
The GJ recommends that the County enforce Ordinance 315- 797. Secure the necessary funding & staffing (using staffavailable as identified in Table 1)as soonas possible. Non-compliance withthe Ordinance maybe a "civil" offense;MJcultivation involvinghundredsor thousandsofplantsmaybea"criminal" offense. INeithercase,offenses that are "tolerated" are a detriment to the County environment and a law-abiding society. [July 2015] Response: Willbeimplemented. The BOShasdirectedstafftofindfundingtoputmore bootson thegroundparticularlyduring theMJseason. The S/O has beenenforcingcriminal offenses of large grows within the funding constraints of that department and the DA's department.
F6
There is no monitoring on groundwater effects or depletion as the result of a larger increase in wells for MJ cultivation within any area. The CA State Regulations rule water resources within all CA counties. No "sensitive aquafers" are identified within Trinity County which might limit the proliferation ofwater wells. Response: / agree inpart. TheState Regulations do not apply to our private water wells.
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
The GJ recommends that the County proactively work with the CA State water regulators to evaluate the sensitivity of Trinity County water resources. The importance of eliminating adverse impacts to groundwater, rivers, streams, anadromous fisheries, and lakes cannot be overstated. [Ongoing, beginning July 2015] Response: Requiresfurther analysis. There have beenand are continuingdiscussions withstaffto look at water wellpermits as a way to acquirefunding to supportstudies ofthe County's manyaquifers. The County's majorsurface water uses are through the two largest water districts
F7
The impacts to wildlife from pesticide use in the vicinity ofMJ grows are not monitored. Response: / agree inpart. There issomemonitoringbyCAFish and Wildlife.
Related Recommendations (1)
R7
The GJ recommends that the County develop a reporting system to notify the US Fish and Wildlife Service and CA Dept. ofFish and Wildlife ofthe locations of known MJ cultivation sites so that monitoring of non-target poisonings to wildlife can be initiated. County employees would provide this information while retaining anonymity. [August 2015] Response: Willbe implemented.
F8
Thereisno"campingordinance"(asofthewritingofthis inApril2015)to control the occasional public nuisance resulting from transients (including transient laborers sometimes called"trimmigrants") who often work intheMJindustry. Insomeareas, a"Fishing Access Ordinance" is the onlyregulation which authorizes County officials to move campers out ofpublic areas. Response: / agree withthisfinding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R8
The GJ recommends that the County draft and adopt an ordinance which specifies all areas where camping is not allowed. The ordinance would include enforcement and penalty guidelines. [August 2015] Response: Has been implemented.
F9
There is no County ordinance to control clearing the vegetation from parcels of land for large MJ cultivations - the only regulations are from CALFIRE for timber- related operations. Response: Iagree withthisfinding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R9
The GJ recommends that the County adopt a grading and land management ordinance so that unacceptable impacts to soil water resources can be avoided. Coordinate the development ofthe ordinance with CALFIRE, Soil Conservation Service, and State Water Quality Control Board. [September2015] Response: Requiresfurther analysis. There is currently the need tofindfunding to completesuchan ordinance andbringittotheBOS.
F10
Tracking ofcode violations from Notice ofViolation through resolution is inadequate, allowing violations to remain unresolved in the complexity of the statutory process. Response: / Agree inpart. Thereare violations that have moved through the system andendedinthecollection offines. There also havebeensome voluntaryabatementofMJas a resultofthesystemthatis inplace.
Related Recommendations (1)
R10
The GJ recommends that the County review existing computer software programs and/or develop a software program to track all phases of code violations. The intent is to resolve violations swiftly. (There were 72 violations of Ordinance 315-797 cited from 2012 to 2014; to date, none have been resolved). [July 2015] Response: Willbe implemented. TheBOS is currently in theprocess ofreviewing the system.
F11
Visitors to Trinity County have experienced undesirable impacts to the natural resource environment, threatening encounters with defensive growers, and a lower qualitydowntown environment which may be exacerbated by the participantsin the cannabis industry. Response: / agree withthisfinding
Related Recommendations (1)
R11
The GJ recommends that the County develop a "complaint system" whereby local citizens and County visitors can easily report areaas of undesirable impactsand/or unpleasant encounters. Follow-upby the appropriate County personnel would be needed to resolve these matters. (A Complaint Form titled "Trinity County Grand Jury ComplaintFormB" hasbeendeveloped andisincludedintheAppendixofthisreport).[August 2015] Response: Has beenimplemented. There is a complaintform thatcan beusedtofile a complaint. This form could be made more user friendly. People are also able tofile a complaint viathetelephone andanycomplaints ofthreatening encountersshould bebrought to theattentionoftheS/O, whichhappensona regular basis.
F12
Students in Trinity County schools experience negative MJ-related effects inboth decreased academic motivation andinparticipation in an illegal economic industry. Response: / agree withthisfinding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R12
The GJ recommends that the County increase its involvement in MJ education in Trinity County schools. Emphasis needs to be placed on the illegal status of MJ, the County Ordinances applicable to MJ, environmental effects, and non-target impacts to wildlife. Involvement from the "Task Force" from Recommendation Rl would be appropriate. [August 2015] Response: Requiresfurther analysis. This requiresapartnership withtheschools and theirboardofdirectors. There is currently apilotprogram thatis being establishedat theone oftheCountyschool districts. Theprogrambringstogether HHS, BHS, TCProbation, TCS/O andtheSuperintendent oftheschool district.
F13
The MJ industry derives large sums ofmoney from ales and distribution, yet the County receives very little benefit from the profits involved due to inadequate fines and collections. Response: / agree withthisfinding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R13
The GJ recommends that the County prepare for changes in MJ laws which may allow for counties to collect taxes (as Colorado does) from legal MJ activities. [October 2016] Response: Has been implemented. TC Supervisors and staffhave been involved in discussions on these issues.
F14
The size and scope ofcontrolling MJ cultivations is beyond the capacity of County law and code enforcement. Trinity County is a large geographic area that is expensive to administer dueto the timeanddistance between codeenforcement personnel and MJ grow sites. Response: / agree withthisfinding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R14
The GJ recommends that the Countyaggressively pursue all avenues of federal and state assistance to provide resources to control illegal MJ grows. The "problems" associated withtheillegal MJindustry affect areas beyond theboundaries ofTrinity County,so federalandstate interventioniswarranted.[July2015] Response: Has been implemented. The county routinely seeks out grantfunds and partnershipswithstateagencies. This is certainlya help, butis nottheultimate solution.
F15
Enforcing Trinity County Ordinances and providing MJ-related low enforcement is entirely dependent on the staffing and funding available to inspect, monitor, correctnon-compliance,and (ifnecessary)prosecuteviolators. Inadequate funding and staffing has resulted in inadequate enforcement. Staffing available to do this work is relatively low and the trend is a decreasing budget and workforce. Response: Disagree inpart. Fundingfrom the TCGeneral Fundhas been increasing overthelastfewyears.
Related Recommendations (1)
R15
The GJ recommends that the County increase its emphasis on providing its citizenry with a law abiding environment by ensuring adequate staffing and funding is available for MJ-related ordinance and law enforcement. County staffat all levels needs to be trained and involved in reporting ordinance violations and illegal activities. [August 2015] Response: Has been implemented. The S/O has receivedincreases in its General Fund budgets over the lastfewyears. Additionally the BOShas directedstafftofindthefunds to hire retiredannuitantsduringtheMJseason toassist inMJenforcement.
F16
County personnel may face dangerous situations upon visiting illegal MJ grows. Guns, dogs, "booby traps", and defensive people are intimidating obstacles for a "safe" inspection compliance visit. Response: Iagree withthisfinding
Related Recommendations (1)
R16
The GJ recommends that the County pursue all available avenues (including Recommendations R14 and R27) to abate known illegal grows and provide law enforcement assistance in inspection compliance in areas where illegal grows are likely. There is no increased danger to County personnel upon visiting "legal" MJ grow sites. [July 2015] Response: Has been implemented. Countyis currentlyworkingon bothjudicialand administrativeabatementprocesses. Additionally,see Recommendation #5 Response.
F17
The Trinity County community is generally unaware of the restrictions which limitMJgrowstoparcels ofproperty which include singlefamily residences andthatata maximum numberof8plants ispermitted onthelargest parcels (parcels of 10acres orgreater). Response: / disagree. The TC Planning Commission hadapproximately twentyfour meetings (about halfofthose were MJ "workshops") overa oneyearperiod in which the MJ draft ordinances were discussed. Testimony was headfrom hundreds ofpeople including MJ growers. These meetings received a lot ofcoverage in the Trinity Journal. The BOShad several meetings todiscuss the 315-797 ordinance. Since the adoption of315-797, the County has had information on its web site, hand out 315-797 fact sheets and the ordinance was discussed at numerous town hall meetings aroundthe county. Persons that are unaware are unaware becausetheywantcode/lawenforcement tothinkthattheyare unaware.
Related Recommendations (1)
R17
The GJ recommends that the County becomes actively involved with public education involving Ordinance 315-797 and laws pertinent to MJ cultivation. Informational meetings, town hall presentations, forming partnerships with appropriate agencies, and providing informative articles to the Trinity Journal would help in gaining community support for growing MJ in compliance with existing ordinances and laws. [July 2015] Response: Has beenimplemented. SeeFinding#17Response.
F18
An ordinance violation involving grows with excessive numbers ofplants that isencountered by County personnel is rarely reported and therefore not abated. Response: / agree withthisfinding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R18
The GJ recommends that the County provide training to its personnel regardingjob responsibilities involvedin providing ordinance compliance while not compromising their abilityto be productivein accomplishing their assignedjob duties. [August 2015] Response: Has been implemented. Staff trainings have been started. Two BOS members are currently investigating the code enforcement process with staff of various departments.
F19
There is a large portion of the local citizenry who are "pro-marijuana' which tends to influence the BOS and inhibit the effective enforcement of existing laws and County ordinances. Many people in our rural county do not like government interference with their chosen activities. Response: / agree in part with thisfinding. The quantifier "large" may be a bit misleading. There are certainlysome "pro-marijuana"folks in the County. However, this groupis dividedintotwodistinctive groups. Onegroupconsists ofTC citizensthatuseMJfor medicinalpurposes andpossiblyfor someprofit. Thisgroupis normallynotaproblemtotheir neighbors. The othergroup consists ofsome TCcitizensandmanynon-citizens (temporarily in TConly to cultivateMJ). Thisgroup containsthepeople thathave severely degradedour TC residents' "qualityoflife". The BOS has been working diligently to get the MJ diversion industry out ofthe County whileprotecting the ability ofitscitizens' ability togrow reasonable amountsofMJ
Related Recommendations (1)
R19
The GJ recommends that the County remain focused on enforcingthe existing local, state,and federal laws. The County should not give preferenceto individuals who choose to cultivate MJ in violation ofexisting laws which have been legally adopted by the government. [Immediately and Ongoing] Response: Has been implemented. The County is now focused on enforcing all governmentlaws indealingwiththeMJindustry.
F20
The general public has "given up complaining" about MJ grows in non compliance of Ordinance 315-797 because the statutory procedure to correct the violation is very lengthy and cumbersome. Response; / disagree withthisfinding. Thepublic had "givenupcomplaining"mostly becausetheydonotsee a resultfor theparcel theycomplainedabout. It is veryhardto believe that theprocess works whenyou canVsee a change in your own backyard, no matter how many enforcements arehappening inotherareasoftheCounty.
Related Recommendations (1)
R20
The GJ recommends that the County assign a Hearing Officer within the District Attorney's office to specifically render decisions on Ordinance violations on a timely basis. Part of the reason the general public may have "given up" is the lack of informationregarding the illegalityofMJ grows (referto Recommendation R17). [July 2015] Response: Will notbeimplemented.
F21
Adjacent Northern Californiacounties have recently banned outdoor MJ grows, increasing the likelihood that Trinity County will become a preferred destination for outdoor MJ growers. Response: / agreewith thisfinding
Related Recommendations (1)
R21
The GJ recommends that the County act swiftly on Recommendation R4 so that Trinity County does not become the sanctuary of illegal MJ cultivation. Review other Counties' regulations and meet with County Counsel to consider adoption of an Ordinance similar to the counties that have banned outdoor MJ grows. [July 2015] Response: Hasbeen implemented. Seeresponse toRecommendation R4.
F22
Members of the BOS are actively working with the MJ industry in anticipation of laws changing to benefit MJ cultivation, sales, and distribution which may eventually benefitthe economy ofTC residents. Response: / agree inpart with thisfinding. Whether or not there will befinancial benefitstotheCountyisyet tobeseen.
Related Recommendations (1)
R22
The GJ recommends that County Counsel be involved with the decisions ofBOSmembers toparticipate inpublic meetings involving MJindustry planswhich are not in compliance with existing local, state, and federal laws. The FJ recommends the members of theBOSactively working withtheMJindustry to reporttheirinvolvement openly ina BOS meeting. [Immediately and Ongoing] Response: Has beenimplementedwithinpublic meetingsoftheBOS.
F23
The civil fine forhaving excessive MJ plants on a privately owned parcel is $100/day with a maximum penalty of 90 days. This fine is seldom collected and has not proven to be a deterrent to growing excessive numbers ofplants. Response: / agree with thisfinding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R23
The GJ recommends that the County increase the civil fine so that it is "meaningful" in order to deter the activities in non-compliance with Ordinance 315- 797. For example, Nevada County's civil fine for excessive plants is $1,000/day. [July 2015] Response: Will notbeimplementedatthistime. This was a BOSdecisionas a resultof CountyCouncilguidance.
F24
MJ Code enforcement fines that are collected do no benefit the program to finance subsequent code enforcement. Response: Idisagreewith thisfinding.
Related Recommendations (1)
R24
The GJ recommends that the County BOS work with County Counsel to determine what, ifany, opportunities exist to use collected fins for subsequent MJ code enforcement. [August 2015] Response: Has been implemented. Fines that are collected are usedfor code enforcement.
F25
Abatement orders are rarely used even though these may provide a swifterresolutionto a problemthanto use a searchwarrant or other "due process" techniques. Manyillegal MJ grows are easily noticed, yet most are allowedto continue without abatement and are harvested at the end ofthe growing season. Response: / agree withthisfinding
Related Recommendations (1)
R25
The GJ recommends that the County adopt an ordinance to allow the Sheriffto take immediate abatement action on any MJ which is cultivated, possessed, or distributed in violation ofCounty ordinance or state law. This action is currently in force in Nevada County under Ordinance NO. 2349 (Abatement actions on pages 13-15) resulting in abatements being accomplished in as little as 10 days after a Notice of Violation is issued. [August 2015] Response: Has been implemented. There are currently violations working through the abatement process. 10