Sonoma County Grand Jury • 2003-2004

Palm Drive Health Care District Parcel Tax Exemption Process May 26, 2004

Published: May 26, 2004 3 pages

View Original PDF

⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.

⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.

Findings and Recommendations 3 findings

The Palm Drive Health Care District is currently planning a renewal of the parcel tax for 2006. The district agrees that the exemption and refund process needs to be reexamined and improved.

Related Recommendations (1)

The Palm Drive Health Care District must reevaluate the procedure it has been following in the granting of exemptions to its parcel tax program. This must be accomplished prior to issuing the next regular tax billing.

The parcel tax approved by voters did not contain an exemption process. The district now agrees that it must publish its exemption and refund procedure to the voters together with the description of the forthcoming parcel tax measure.

Related Recommendations (1)

Prior to the next regular tax billing, the district must reexamine the exemptions granted, and determine if these parcels were correctly exempted. Those parcels not correctly exempted must have their parcel tax immediately reinstated and the prior exempted amount collected.

The present exemption and refund procedure is not evenly applied to parcel owners in the Palm Drive District. Conclusions The Palm Drive Health Care District policy of granting exemptions or refunds is in need of review for proper interpretation and implementation. In the past, granting exemptions had not conformed to the letter of the policy that the district had published. This had led to discrimination where some taxpayer’s in like circumstances had not received exemptions while others had. The creditability of the system is now in question. 2/3 May 26, 2004

Related Recommendations (1)

The district is urged to appoint an independent resource to audit the exemptions granted, and determine if these parcels were correctly exempted. The details of the exemption process must be studied and reapplied by the district where applicable.

Additional Recommendations 2

These recommendations are not explicitly linked to specific findings.

R4

The district must publish a tax exemption procedure, if one is to be in effect, to be sent to the voters together with a description of the proposed new parcel tax measure so that there will be no ambiguity when applying a tax exemption in the future.
R5

All requests for Hardship Exemption must be denied. The applicant must be referred to the program entitled: “Property Tax Postponement for Senior Citizens, Blind or Disabled Citizens”, to determine if they are eligible. Prior Hardship Exemptions must be immediately reinstated and the prior exempted amount collected. Required Responses to Findings None Required Responses to the Recommendation Palm Drive Health Care District Board of Directors - R1, R2, R3, R4, R5.

Conclusions 1

CL1 Page 2

The Palm Drive Health Care District policy of granting exemptions or refunds is in need of review for proper interpretation and implementation. In the past, granting exemptions had not conformed to the letter of the policy that the district had published. This had led to discrimination where some taxpayer’s in like circumstances had not received exemptions while others had. The creditability of the system is now in question. 2/3 May 26, 2004

Agency Responses 1

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.

Palm Drive Health Care District Board of Directors

September 01, 2004 • 2 pages View Details ▾

PDF

No Responses Found 1

Government entities assigned to respond to this report. No response documents have been linked in our database.

Palm Drive Health Care District Special District