Mendocino County Grand Jury • 2010-2011 • Agency Response
Response to: BETTER THAN SOME HOMES

Response Form Grand Jury Report Title: a Pot Paradox or Bud Bingo Report Dated: April 20, 2011 Response Form Submitted*

Published: April 20, 2011 3 pages
View Original PDF

Note: Missing finding numbers detected: F4, F6, F7, F8, F9

Findings and Recommendations 6 findings

F1
The Board of Supervisors disagrees with this finding to the extent that in order to comply with the State Attorney General Guidelines, any dispensary must be organized as a collective or cooperative.
No recommendations for this finding
F2
Planning and zoning ordinances are enacted by action of the Board of Supervisors.
No recommendations for this finding
F3
The Treasurer Tax-Collector is able to accurately state the number of licenses issued to date.
No recommendations for this finding
F5
The Board of Supervisors admits the finding, but adds the ordinance was never considered for action by the committee. Findings 7, 8, 9: The Board of Supervisors has no specific information regarding these findings.
No recommendations for this finding
F10
A tax initiative has always required a 2/3 vote of the electorate.
No recommendations for this finding
F11
Bullet 1: Unincorporated County only. Bullet 2: Agree but only because 9.31 was never intended to deal with dispensaries. Public nuisances can still be dealt with through the various county departments. Bullet 3: The public safety impacts are currently being met, regardless of the existence of dispensaries. Bullet 4: Agree with the finding.
No recommendations for this finding

* This report's PDF did not contain easily extractable text and required Optical Character Recognition (OCR) for analysis. There may be minor errors in the extracted findings and recommendations due to OCR limitations with scanned documents.