⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings and Recommendations 4 findings
F1
Committee to produce an effective report to the public. No such report was produced in some years. It appears that many required Respondents are not familiar with the State Penal Code and
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
proper Continuity Committee Report be produced each year. Both the Court and Grand Jury should help respondents be aware of requirements in both
F2
Trinity County Policy Statement and either does not respond at all, respond past the required deadline, and/or respond inappropriately. Some Respondents do a very commendable job with their response which is thoughtful,
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
format and timeliness for responding to Grand Jury Reports.
F3
on-time, and in the format required by law.
No recommendations for this finding
F4
that e-mail and conference calls were held without proper public notice. Planning Department - No response was received. The associated report was SDR2015- . 2016-001 - Water. Environmental Health Director - Responses were timely, although a few days off, were • appropriate and mostly positive. Code Enforcement Officer - No response was received. The associated report was SDR2015-2016-001 - Water. Trinity County Waterworks District #1 - Responses were timely, however, there were no . responses to the Findings as required. The two water districts filed combined reports even though they were required to answer separately. Weaverville Community Services District - Responses were timely, however, there were no responses to the Findings. The two water districts filed a combined response where separate responses were required. FINDINGS The Trinity County Grand Jury does not have policies and procedures for a Continuity F1. Committee to produce an effective report to the public. No such report was produced in some years. It appears that many required Respondents are not familiar with the State Penal Code and F2. Trinity County Policy Statement and either does not respond at all, respond past the required deadline, and/or respond inappropriately. Some Respondents do a very commendable job with their response which is thoughtful, F3. on-time, and in the format required by law.
No recommendations for this finding