📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 5 findings
F1
Page 66
The costs of running the CWD exceed the revenue and must be supplemented with reserve funds.
F2
Page 66
The computers are very old and need replacing.
F3
Page 66
It is not economically feasible to have generator backup power available to run the pumping equipment in the event of a prolonged power outage.
F4
Page 66
If more customers were to come onto District water, it would help the overall budget.
F5
Page 66
Finding new customers is difficult as the District is still using “old school” methods of advertisement. 2019-2020 Tehama County Grand Jury Final Report 65
Recommendations 1
-
R1Page 67The Grand Jury recommends that a free Facebook page and occasional press releases be established until a webpage is developed, as an avenue to promote the District and keep the public informed of the advantages of using District water instead of ground wells. COMMENDATION The Grand Jury finds that the Corning Water District is doing a good job managing the needs of customers as well as covering debts and increased water fees. This is especially true as the District has no control over the fees they have to pay for water and the assessments incurred for construction and maintenance to have the water available for distribution.