📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Recommendations 4
-
R1Page 5The respondent agrees with the finding.
-
R2Page 5The respondent disagrees wholly or partially with the finding. The response shall specify the portion of the finding that is disputed and shall include an explanation of the reasons for the disagreement. Reporting Action in Response to Recommendations Recommendations by the Grand Jury require action. The responding person or entity must report action and all recommendations in one of four ways:
-
R3Page 5The recommendation required further analysis. The law requires a detailed explanation of the analysis or study and the timeframe not to exceed six months. In this response, the analysis or study must be submitted to the officer, director, or governing body of the agency being investigated.
-
R4Page 5The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted, or is not reasonable, with an explanation. i Final Report Response Format The following standard format is to be used when responding to the Grand Jury’s report and is to be used by all agencies when responding: Responding Agency ____________________________________________ Response by __(Governing Body, Department Head)___________________