📋
Extracted from Consolidated Report
This investigation was originally published as part of a larger consolidated report containing multiple investigations. View the consolidated PDF for the complete document.
⚠️ Translation Notice: This content has been automatically translated. The original English text is the official version. Translation may contain errors.
⚠️ Este contenido ha sido traducido automáticamente. El texto original en inglés es la versión oficial. La traducción puede contener errores.
Findings 15 findings
F1
Page 1
The company handling administrative actions for parking citations is paid once per citation.
F2
Page 1
Individuals do not receive sufficient information on the process of requesting an appeal to a parking citation or fully understand the information they are provided. They can obtain information either by writing to the address on the citation, or calling the toll-free number.
F3
Page 1
The Agency provides an insufficient level of training and instruction to the intermediaries and their respective real estate agents. An emphasis on the need to use the Affirmative Marketing Principles to “identify persons in the housing market who are not likely to apply for housing without special outreach” is lacking.
F4
Page 1
The Agency provides an insufficient level of training and/or instruction to the intermediaries and their staff on the NSP program beyond the construction/re-sale requirements. There is a lack of distinction placed on the purposes of increasing homeownership to those who may not know that they can achieve such status. This federal program is more than just the business as usual of rehabilitating homes and selling. 6 2011‐2012 San Bernardino County Grand Jury Final Report
F5
Page 1
The Grand Jury found that staff within City Departments had a general lack of understanding of the building requirements for this project.
F6
Page 1
The Counties of Riverside and Orange Fleet Management Departments administer and service all county vehicles, including the Sheriff’s Department. In these counties, law enforcement vehicles are given priority service due to public safety concerns. In those 18 2011‐2012 San Bernardino County Grand Jury Final Report
F7
Page 1
FLTM is working with the CFD to evaluate the organizational structure and operations of its fleet division to determine if cost savings and/or operational efficiencies can be obtained. A committee consisting of both Fleet Management and County Fire personnel meet bi-monthly to determine best practices and cost savings while maintaining public safety.
F8
Page 1
Inmate felt intake evaluation points did not require maximum security; not enough religious contact & materials available
F9
Page 1
Grieved improper discipline
F10
Page 1
Inmate grieved not receiving pain medications as prescribed
F11
Page 1
Contesting discipline for not working
F12
Page 1
Inmate grieved that sentence was for GHRC, wanted CDC closer to home; no $ to get home once released; wanted to be transported to CDC upon release
F13
Page 1
Grieved improper medical care by LVN for headache
F14
Page 1
Wanted to move back to Dorm 1 from Dorm 2, due to fear and intimidation
F15
Page 1
Inmate’s friend was questioned about amount of deposit – why?
Recommendations 1
-
09-02Page 1The 2008-2009 Grand Jury’s recommendation was to develop written policies and procedures to prevent future delays and communicate to detain active resistant TB patients. UPDATE: The 2011-2012 Grand Jury found that the County DPH Tuberculosis Control Program created a written treatment policy that outlines procedure duties and responsibilities of the various departments for the Civil Enforcement of Detention and Quarantine of Persons with Infectious TB. The policy was written on March 12, 2011; the written policy is thorough and outlines duties of all departments involved. 94 2011-2012 San Bernardino County Grand Jury Final Report Responding Agency No Response Required Recommendations Due Date 95 2011-2012 San Bernardino County Grand Jury Final Report SAN MANUEL AMPHITHEATER BACKGROUND In researching past reports, the Grand Jury became interested in the 1999-2000 Grand Jury Final Report regarding the Amphitheater located at Glen Helen Regional Park, currently known as the San Manuel Amphitheater (Amphitheater). Recommendations were made at the time, with positive responses from the County of San Bernardino. Interviews were conducted to follow-up on the responses and this Grand Jury found the following information to be true and is satisfied with the outcome.