Score: +14 (15/7/1)
Orange County Grand Jury • 2002-2003

Unresolved County Harassment Complaints

8 pages
View Original PDF

Findings and Recommendations 6 findings

F1
The County Executive Office did not take all necessary steps to promptly investigate the allegations of sexual harassment, hostile work environment and retaliation by Employee Number One as required by the Orange County EEO Policy.
Related Recommendations (1)
R1
An independent qualified EEO investigator conduct a thorough investigation of Employee Number One’s allegations of sexual harassment, hostile work environment and retaliation. (Finding 1)
F2
The County Executive Office did not take all necessary steps to promptly investigate the allegations of sexual harassment, hostile work environment and retaliation by Employee Number Two as required by the Orange County EEO Policy.
Related Recommendations (1)
R2
An independent qualified EEO investigator conduct a thorough investigation of Employee Number Two’s allegations of sexual harassment, hostile work environment and retaliation. (Finding 2)
F3
The County Executive Office did not take all necessary steps to promptly investigate the allegations of sexual harassment, hostile work environment and retaliation by Employee Number Three as required by the Orange County EEO Policy.
Related Recommendations (1)
R3
An independent qualified EEO investigator conduct a thorough investigation of Employee Number Three’s allegations of sexual harassment, hostile work environment and retaliation. (Finding 3)
F4
The County Executive Office did not take all necessary steps to promptly investigate the allegations of sexual harassment, hostile work environment and retaliation by Employee Number Four as required by the Orange County EEO Policy.
Related Recommendations (1)
R4
An independent qualified EEO investigator conduct a thorough investigation of Employee Number Four’s allegations of sexual harassment, hostile work environment and retaliation. (Finding 4)
F5
The County Executive Office did not take all necessary steps to promptly investigate the allegations of sexual harassment, hostile work environment and retaliation by Employee Number Five as required by the Orange County EEO Policy.
Related Recommendations (1)
R5
An independent qualified EEO investigator conduct a thorough investigation of Employee Number Five’s allegations of sexual harassment, hostile work environment and retaliation. (Finding 5)
F6
At its current reporting level, the EEO Access Office does not have the independence to investigate certain management employees. Responses to Findings 1 – 6 are required from the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Responses to Findings 1 – 6 are requested from the County Executive Officer. 7
Related Recommendations (1)
R6
Evaluate the current reporting relationship for the EEO Access Office to enable proper performance of its duties. (Finding 6) Responses are required to Recommendations 1 – 6 from the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Responses to Recommendations 1 - 6 are requested from the Orange County Chief Executive Officer. BIBLIOGRAPHY County of Orange Equal Employment Opportunity Policy and Procedures 7 Steps to Lawfully Investigate Harassment and Discrimination Complaints, presented by Brightline Compliance LLC, October, 2001 Orange County Commitment to Equal Employment Opportunity, January, 2002 Update EEOC Compliance Manual, May 20, 1998, The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission NOTES 1 Orange County Human Resources EEO Access Office www.oc.ca.gov/hr/eeo/index.htm 2 Orange County Human Resources EEO Access Office www.oc.ca..gov/hr/eeo/commit.htm 3 Orange County Human Resources EEO Access Office www.oc.ca.gov/hr/eeo/newpolicy.htm 4 County Executive Office Letter dated June 14, 2001 [to five employees] 5 EEOC Compliance Manual, Washington, D.C.: May 20, 1998, The U.S. EEO Commission 8

Agency Responses 9

Government agencies' official responses to this report's findings and recommendations. Click on a response to see the structured breakdown.